Jump to content

Y&R: Week of June 8, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 785
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Honestly watching the clip I'm baffled I understand the need for drama I know Nick and Sharon got stupider as characters this year (if possible) but did they lose all class and tact even where their child is concerned? Which teenager or even adult wants to hear their parents announce that their expected kiid brother or siister maybe daddy's or step-daddy's it seriously make sense to wait for some dna results before announcing these things :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Their eventual wedding at the close of the show, say in 2016, will be what you want...closure.

This is NOT closure. Neither Nick nor Sharon have dealt with any of their issues. This is an interim stop in a much longer journey, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But what is the agenda? I don't quite get what they are trying to accomplish. Why break of Nick and Phyllis, if you aren't going to do a good full on reunion for Nick and Sharon. It didn't have to last, but at least let the set up be romantic. Give them a few months of happiness. I don't understand what the show is trying to accomplish. Unless they do think this is the happy romantic reunion some viewers have been waiting for. :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they want to keep ambiguity going because they think this is a way to keep fans invested. They may feel that some fans will always want Nick with Phyllis, so they have to put some doubt into the story with Nick and Sharon. I guess the problem is how to write the ambiguity without making the characters look shallow. Bill Bell managed to pull this off for years with Victor and Nikki, probably because when they weren't together, they were genuinely committed to their other partners. They didn't need to have sex because they were essentially having sex every time they would argue, or Nikki would crash one of Victor's weddings.

I also think they made a mistake bringing Cassie into this story. Earlier they set up a story where Sharon's problems were rooted in her early past. Bringing Cassie in devalues the impact she had because she becomes a crutch, people are more likely to remember her as her parents using her death as an excuse for being sluts, and this also potentially devalues her if they ever want to bring her into the story at a later date.

Someone at Y&R may also see the characters as pawns (which they are to a writer, but not to fans) and they don't understand the impact if the character starts sleeping around with various people and yet is still supposed to be in some type of true love forever relationship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The next step to crap-dom in this story is having Nick go back to Phyllis once he realizes he can't handle all that comes with "committing" (even by Nick and Sharon's standards) to Sharon, GOD i swear if they give them another round I'll have only a few characters left to keep me hanging in :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess I'm just ready for short term closure now. Like I said it didn't have to last this go around, but what they have given us is truly repulsive, imo. I'm not even a huge Sharon and Nick fan, that's the funny part. I just wanted a good reunion and then the cracks in their marriage can start to show again. But all the multiple people the quad has shagged of late makes me HATE the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There are several

1. Make Nick Happen

2. Make the Newman men happen

3. Prop a certain Giggling Heffa

4. Appease certain entitled vocal fanbases

5. Prop Noah

TPTB screwed EVERY fanbase.

Nick/Sharon, Jack/Sharon, Nick & Phyllis, Jack/Phyllis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not that I don't agree with you, in this case, it's that it'd be nice if there were one thing you did enjoy about the show that you could share.

Why do you watch if this is not the case?

There are too many loose ends for this to be the ultimate reunion between Nick and Sharon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There are so many great posts in this thread that I wish I could reply to every single one of them, but I don't have the time.

Thank you all for the great welcome! It may take me days to read through the entire week's posting of Y&R, but I'm never bored with it. I just love the different personalities and input.

I still watch GL, and OLTL, but I haven't posted in those threads because it takes me a long time to get through the Y & R one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How many times am I going to praise Nina's apperances here and there and Elizabeth Hendrickson/Chole? Those two are about the only thing I actually like going on at the moment.

Out of habit, and no matter how bad this show is, I watch because it's my routine. I may take a break here and there, but I stll keep up with what's going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel the need to answer this since people keep asking. Why watch a soap when it sucks? Habit and loyalty. Many soap viewers are watching the life story of characters they love and grew up on. Sometimes that story sucks (ATWT I'm looking at you), but that doesn't mean I'm going to bail on watching the lives of people I've cared about for 20 years. Yeah, that makes me an old school kind of viewer, but that's the kind of viewer soaps need. As a soap loses that kind of viewer they die. We saw it with GL. As some point there was nothing recognizable left and many of the people who GL had to work to lose left. Let's hope that doesn't happen to Y&R anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes. We should absolutely move on from John/Drake's 40 year legacy on the show to see what Leo is going to do tomorrow.  Lol.  This can't be a serious post.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Sydney Mikayla (formerly Trina Robinson on GH) graduating from UCLA, June 2025 https://www.instagram.com/p/DKh92usSow8/ officialsydneymikayla In 8 days, I’ll walk across the stage at the #1 public university in the country — @ucla What a journey.

      Please register in order to view this content

      I came in with a dream and left with a purpose. From lecture halls to rehearsals, community work to creative sets, every moment shaped me. I’m so proud of the stories I’ve told here — and the ones still unfolding. Grateful to everyone who poured into me, supported me, challenged me, and believed in me. Fours up and peace out! #UCLA #ClassOf2025 #BlackBruinExcellence #YearbookVideo @jordanward              
    • The actor who plays Martin has been teasing that nobody has guessed Martin's secret. I love that for things like that and the June story we have no idea. I feel like if we didn't have the day ahead feeds Anita's reveal would've been shocking as well. I love that they aren't going the obvious route with these stories. 
    • I tried following the news in Los Angeles at https://laist.com (independent public radio and news) They had up-to-the minute accurate info during the wildfires in January. There's no video, no impact to my mind as to what's happening. Trying other outlets, to get the truth, but it's hard.  
    • That's a bit murky since that happened during a writers' strike. Assuming Kristen Marie had a 2-year contract she left about when her contract would have expired and Sharlene and Josie showed up right before that. Lemay was officially credited as HW from September 1988 but it seems very probable that his anticipated tenure influenced events that happened during the strike which started in April. 
    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy