Jump to content

GH: June Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I simply do not like Sarah Brown as an actress. I didn't like her as Carly or as Julia v.2 on ATWT and don't like her as Claudia. I actually think that it has hurt GH to have her back in another role other than Carly. It is jarring to have her playing original Carly as a new character with Laura Wright as Carly with a different personality. It is unfettered craziness and bad judgment on the part of Guza and Phelps as was killing off Emily and bringing back NL as Rebecca. They are asking too much of the audience which already has to suspend every single facet of reality to watch GH.

All this being said, we are stuck with her and I do like how Claudia is making Sonny, Jason and Carly's lives miserable. Hope she keeps it up.

Welcome to All Sonny's Children. It is going to be a looooong summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 268
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Claudia said the other day that Michael is 16. I laughed and thought, that's funny he was 12 a year ago. :lol: I don't know about Kristina yet but she looked older and she is supposed to be younger than Michael. :huh: On a side not I will miss the last Kristina. She really was the cutest little girl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do like the new Kristina. I think she can finally become part of the show and Alexis/Sonny's lives instead of seeing her once or twice a month out for ice cream with her nanny. She came across very manipulative to Jason, showing her true side, but I can only hope there's a likability factor to her a well. I hope this can turn around some of these storylines, should be interesting.

Ethan and Rebecca..! I heard about this, but it's very interesting...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Things i want to know about Kristina?

Does she know what her Father does to make all his cash?

Why is Alexis all up in Nicks Chilli instead of making sure her teen daughter isn't hanging at clubs?

Why doesn't Kristina even have a hint of Latin blood?

Did she even know her half brother just came out of 1 year coma?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We didn't see Kristina with Alexis... this WAS her debut, right? I didn't at first think we were supposed to know why Jason was plucking this girl from this after hours club, and then they revealed she was Kristina.

Kristina must know what Sonny does because she knows Michael was shot and she called Jason her "dad's number one flunkie".

From Kristina's talk about Alexis, she seems to have her mother wrapped around her finger, and could play out, word for word, how conversations with her mother would go, through Kristina's lies. This was intercut with scenes of Alexis talking about how Kristina has straight As, wants to go to Yale, and is "the perfect daughter". So we were obviously being shown that Kristina was far from perfect and things weren't what they seem with Kristina.

I thought Kristina could pass for half-latin. I actually think she's got an interesting mix of looks between Alexis and Sonny. She has dark, penetrating eyes like Sonny, a wider nose, like Alexis, and she's smart and intense. I was very intrigued by her.

It was explained that she never visited Michael during the coma because Alexis deemed it would be "too upsetting" for Kristina to see him that way, but I got the impression that Kristina didn't mind not seeing him.

As for casting, I've been VERY impressed with Michael and Kristina... two young performers who can most definitely act. I really liked what the actress did in scenes with Kristina where she would hit a wall and shut down, with a line like "I don't want to talk about it anymore" or "I'm bored. Drive me home." She would have this cold, detached expression and it was truly fascinating to watch. Really intrigued by Kristina. And Drew Garrett is definitely connecting well to his character. The emotional outbursts DO bring a lot of emotion, where a lesser actor would just be yelling. I think he's handling this brain damage/coma stuff better than Steve Burton did all those years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

(insert comment about how Guza hates history)

Poor Paige. A woman who we only knew as dying of breast cancer and being dearly devoted to her daughter Emily. Now turned into some type of monster in order to prop one of the worst characters ever on GH, Rebecca.

Ethan somehow manages to be even worse than Natalia Livingston. Now that takes talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What can you do? I swear, I don't even get worked up any more. I have decided that my memories of GH cannot be destroyed by the disdain that Guza has for GH's history. Paige was so wonderful. We knew her for a short time, but her devotion to Emily shone through in every scene. It is impossible that Paige could have ever sold one of her children so I am ignoring everything that I heard today.

No words for the poor acting from Natalia Livingston and Nathan Parson in their scenes. What was with the huge necklace and earring that Parsons was wearing? He has got to stop borrowing Tony Geary's jewelry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know I shouldn't be this disgusted by the constant crapping on history, especially after we learned at the beginning of NL's run that breast cancer is cured by true love (and horrible acting). That offensive story should have told me of the respect for the history of Emily and Paige and breast cancer victims. But still I never imagined they would trash a woman who died 15 years ago, a woman who was only ever known for being a rock to Monica and trying to provide her daughter with a good home.

Guza keeps sinking to lower and lower lows. If this were out of some type of creativity I might have some sympathy, but no, it's just endless propping because NL is a bust on her return.

I think they should just have Ethan start dressing like Mrs. Roper from Three's Company. He could just say constant drunken bouts are why he's hard to understand. Luke and Mr. Roper aren't that far apart these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The last five or so episodes of season 8 after the Jean Hackney story ended were pretty strong with the Laura/Val friendship breakdown, Ben's PTSD with Val trying to help him, and the start of Jill realizing that Val was as much of a threat to her happiness with Gary as Abby was. I always thought that the Jean Hackney story should have ended at mid season at the latest... and then deal with the fall-out because seeing Ben/Val switch roles with Ben in mental decline instead of Val would have been interesting to explore.  And seeing Val and Laura's friendship suffer also was interesting and should have been explored especially with Karen caught in the middle and Abby both intrigued and amused at the conflict that she didn't cause. However, season 8 was the only Latham run season where Val was well written.  
    • Well, she's not in there sweeping the floors at the end of the night, and you don't bring in an award-winning producer to just sit on their backsides (or hey, maybe you do!). Again, without knowing the specific capacity she's in there working as⏤and it seems as if we are not going to at the present time⏤it's hard to speculate/discuss. I would interpret she's in a role that either would not require being credited, or she's, as others have speculated, is back and not receiving credit for the work she's done. That'd be like saying, per the WGA, all writers must be credited, but as we've seen by those who've worked as fi-core, they don't always receive credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       And, if my research is correct, per the DGA, you can request not to be credited for work you do. I could only assume the same would be for the PGA, as well.
    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy