Jump to content

CBS PLEASE CANCEL AS THE WORLD TURNS!!!!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Goutman's been in the job for, what, 10 years now? The most disturbing thing about the decline of the soap genre is that the industry now rewards failure after failure by keeping you in a job undeservedly. Passanante and Goutman should have gone at least 3 years ago when there may have been time to salvage. FFS, his predecessor in the job- Felicia Minei Behr- managed to stabilise and improve the show somewhat after the 1996-97 ride from hell. Goutman has only brought it back to that level... or worse.

ATWT still has the vets, and despite all the damage that's been done since about 1995, none of the hacks pretending to be writers have radically altered the history of the show have they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I have often thought about why Wheeler and Goutman have last this long and I agree with the above. The only conclusion that can be made is they don't care anymore. I think they stopped when they deleted the position of Executive in Charge of Production.

P&G has a history of not keeping producers and writers around that long beginning with the 70's. GL went through numerous production changes every 4 to 5 years after the 20 plus year tenure of Lucy Ferri. AW constantly went through changes after Paul Rauch left. And so on. And same with writers. With the onset of the 70's so many of the P&G shows had writers who never lasted more than 5 years and often not given that much time at all.

Yet now they keep Goutman and Wheeler and Passanante and Kreizman no matter what happens. And I think they care least about ATWT than they do GL. With GL they at least have tried new production techniques, tried to cut the budget, etc. It seems like there they are really trying to save the show. But either Goutman is not as imaginative as Wheeler or both he and P&G just don't give a damn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Uhm...c'mon....not all of Goutman's tenure has been a disaster. Everyone was kissing his and Sheffer's ass just a couple of years ago. The only truly BAD decisions he's made is keeping Pissy, and this "compressed" storytelling that's going on. You have to factor in the budget in the hiring and firings dilemmas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think all of his tenure has been bad. I was a big supporter of his for a long time.

Now as far as Sheffer. I wasn't around on this board during his tenure that much but I was never a big supporter of Sheffer. I liked what he did when Carolyn Culliton was working with him, but I never felt Sheffer was right for ATWT. I have said it before but I'll say it again. Sheffer is good with a strong writer by his side. When he is in control or working with a less talented writer Sheffer's weaknesses become so apparent.

I feel like he strives way too much on camp which I like in small doses but he takes it way overboard. And the only stories he can writer for an older man especially are illnesses or stories that put them in a bed or confined in some way. He sees older men as weak and can't writer a strong older male character at all.

He pretty well gave Bob Hughes one story while he was there and Bob spent a huge part of it in a coma. And then at Days look what he did to Stefano DiMera.

He has other weaknesses too but those stuck out to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's already put many out of work, so putting even more out of work is fine? I don't see the logic.

If your point was that we should care about the people who have already lost their jobs too, I would wholeheartedly agree with that. It's not an either-or. But I don't see this as hypocrisy at all, which you seem to imply. Cancellation would do nothing to bring jobs back, and no one on here was ever urging on CBS budget cuts.

It's also not an either-or to both want the show around for "selfish" enjoyment reasons and at the same time recognize that it is a real-world employer.

Ruckston Hills - again, that doesn't mean the show can't be something someone else could enjoy just because you don't. Switch it off, change the channel, but cancellation?

About EP/HW longevity - I'm actually happy with this to an extent. Being too trigger-happy with firing has been a problem leading to shows not developing a vision or not maintaining consistency in story and in characterization in the past. AW's constant turnover of EPs and HWs was part of what led to its demise. There just needs to be a balance between giving execs space to implement their vision, and recognizing when they have failed and stepping in. I do believe P&G still cares, as shown by their advertising for ATWT and GL during the People's Choice Awards, the podcast experiment awhile back, and the P&G Classic Soaps blog. If they didn't care, I think both ATWT and GL might have been canceled some time ago. P&G has had to fight to keep them on the air as long as they have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I brought that up as a point to say that every GL fan(and fan of a dying soap) uses that as an excuse to justify this 3PM eyesore. These fans always mention all the people who will be put out of work instead of mentioning the people who have already lost their jobs and have to find work doing stuff for another show. They lost their jobs too. They have families and drug/alcohol addictions to feed too. Prior to your last-minute save, those people were never mentioned in these pathetic "Let's Save Guiding Light" pep rallies.

Wanting a show to survive because you believe it is well written, acted, and produced is one thing. But please leave the whole jobs thing out of it. Don't justify the suits' cost-cutting by saying, "It will put SO MANY PEOPLE OUT OF WORK! OMG!"

I mean, what's next? Are GL fans going to send in Duracell batteries to the White House, asking Obama for stimulus money to save their show?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If P&G really cared about their soaps, all those hack writers would have been fired ages ago.

GL's sets are BEYOND hideous. Why can they spend money on the sets? Why can't the hire designers from HGTV and fix up those fugly sets? They have money but those fuckers are too greedy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is always the most ridiculous thing I ever hear of. Why people think that they have to resort to foolish gimmicks like that is way beyond me...if they feel so passionate about a show and want to do something about it, they can't put their thoughts in a nice letter? And have a zillion people send them in? WTF kind of a message does sending in boxes of macaroni and cheese going to put forth?

And don't even get me started on the fans of a certain couple on an NBC soap who sent in bedding sets as a hint to have said couple get it on more. Tacky!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd never defend Sheffer either. For all the praise heaped on that man by the ass-kissing Emmy voters, I can't think of one character he developed that was more than a caricature.

I'm just saying, for all his faults, Goutman did make some good moves. I'm not sure if he's burned out, the budget crunch has forced him into some corners or what...(some have mentioned ATWT doesn't want to risk the wrath of cutting vets like GL did... which I think rings true.) But he's still pulled some innovations out of his butt that went over a lot better in the cost-cutting department than GL's did. One only needs to look at the puny GL sets to realize that.

I used to believe all the "P&G doesn't care/they want out" talk. Until they brought Grant Aleksander back to GL. That's not a move to tank your show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The actor who plays Martin has been teasing that nobody has guessed Martin's secret. I love that for things like that and the June story we have no idea. I feel like if we didn't have the day ahead feeds Anita's reveal would've been shocking as well. I love that they aren't going the obvious route with these stories. 
    • I tried following the news in Los Angeles at https://laist.com (independent public radio and news) They had up-to-the minute accurate info during the wildfires in January. There's no video, no impact to my mind as to what's happening. Trying other outlets, to get the truth, but it's hard.  
    • That's a bit murky since that happened during a writers' strike. Assuming Kristen Marie had a 2-year contract she left about when her contract would have expired and Sharlene and Josie showed up right before that. Lemay was officially credited as HW from September 1988 but it seems very probable that his anticipated tenure influenced events that happened during the strike which started in April. 
    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy