Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Voters need to realize like yesterday that this is not some damn game show where the objective is to acquire fabulous (and free!) games and prizes.  This country was not built on the idea of people getting something (or everything) for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3459

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

As the Coronavirus tanks the Dow and world markets, how ironic would it be if Trump and the GOP's disdain of science did them in? (CDC is largely gutted already. Comforting, no?)

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/market-plunge-over-coronavirus-fears-underscores-political-risk-to-trump/2020/02/24/331aa162-572a-11ea-9000-f3cffee23036_story.html#comments-wrapper

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Most of these ideas aren't really about getting anything for free. Hillary is the one who brought the idea of universal healthcare to the forefront 25 years (or so ago) and few people see her as a socialist.  I think her idea of lowering the age of medicare was better, btw. I also think fixing up Obama care is way more realistic.

 

In any case, healthcare wouldn't be free. The people who use it are taxed for it and that is largely the middle class. The exception might be the very poor. Still, let's not forget that taxpayers are already paying for these folks when they go to the emergency room. I know where of I speak, since I was one of them as a kid.  I ended up in the emergency room twice and spent a week in the hospital for something that could have been treat much sooner as an outpatient, if my mother could have afforded insurance or a doctor's appointment.

 

The same can be said for nearly any of these programs. "Free college" would not be free any more than public k-12 is free. Universal pre-K, which I think should be more of a priority than college would not be "free".

 

Anyway, Bernie is talking himself right into a world of trouble with this Cuba nonsense right before SC, so I'm not writing off Uncle Joe just yet. There is still hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In more cultist news, a field director for Bernie had his private account exposed, where he tweeted at length about, among other things, how ugly Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren are, talking about how Hillary needs to be catapaulted, how Bernie supporters should phonebank for Bloomberg and put in false data to ruin his campaign, how Jonathan Van Ness is dying of AIDS, and how Pete Buttigieg had "botched" conversion therapy and his husband will become a meth dealer running around with twinks.

 

Bernie's campaign did what any campaign should do, and fired him.

 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/bernie-sanders-staffer-mocked-elizabeth-warrens-looks-pete-buttigiegs-sexuality-on-private-twitter-account

 

Some of the highest profile cultists, the general sleaze at Chapo and Secular Talk, instead of just saying his private comments shouldn't have been exposed, chose to fight for his job and get angry at the campaign for actually running like a campaign instead of the dirtbag bigotry that pays their bills and gets them out of bed in the morning.

 

Bernie supporters are the same people who love to lash out at any criticism of him by saying it's anti-Semetic and that you should never bring up his advanced age, frail health, his wife's money scandals, his general uselessness as an activist, his love of dictators, etc. Yet extensive vile comments from someone with a major role in Bernie's campaign are ardently defended and they are throwing money at this man instead of giving it to their dear leader. 

 

If anyone in Bernie's camp has any sense, they should be very nervous about these reactions, especially since the voter turnout in IA/NH/NV has shown few, if any new voters are coming to the polls for him. His bedrock of support is depraved and toxic and if they start to feel that he has "sold out" or become a "cop" or what have you, and that supporting him doesn't mean you get to [!@#$%^&*] all over everyone with zero consequence, they will turn against him and rally everyone else to do the same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Donald Trump and the rest of the GOP don't disdain science.  They just exploit many others' ignorance of it to make more money. 

Please register in order to view this content

 

 

LOL!

 

But seriously.  I do believe Chasten and Pete Buttigieg's union will be done once Pete's silly campaign is finished.

 

Meanwhile, Michael Bloomberg's campaign basically implodes again:

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/audio-bloomberg-slammed-warren-scary-023635538.html

 

 

Same.  You don't forget an endorsement of Fidel Castro's regime too quickly.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Friends in my chat group said - you're Gay and so you should be as far Left as you can get...and we're disappointed in you.  I said I don't think my gayness should make me as far Left as I can get.  I just don't.  I'm not Republican and have voted it - Republican - locally once in my life.  I do listen to people.  If I say something like I don't agree with Bernie or most of his policies - he's making promises he can't deliver - I'll still vote for him because of the SCOTUS...that makes me a bad Democrat?  I feel like we are imploding and it's stupid.  

Oh Gosh - 20 years ago I met a group of people who I became friends with and it turned out they were Log Cabin Republicans.  I stopped talking to Republicans then (I think).  They're Gay Republicans.  It's awful.  They don't want you, they don't like you and at the time, they won't even accept your money because it's not as good as the straight Republicans.  Then they would officially endorse the Republican candidate.  To me, there's so much wrong with that.  You hate yourself so much that you want to be accepted by someone you know has acknowledged they hate you?  I don't know how to explain it but that's how I felt when I would interact with them.  So I stopped.  LOL.  My best friend and roommate said - you can't reason with them, don't even try.  We need to break off with them - they lived a different life and came from money and we didn't.  They'll sell their souls for money and will never be authentic.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

It's because he hates the right people. Some were insisting he's a great guy, but then I saw this, so no, he's just like all the other 'bros':

 

 

He also fits into the easy, fun categories of gay men that many on the left need as the ideal - a cute, sassy twink who hates women and hates other gay men. I actually saw someone talking about how people need to see Boys in the Band in order to understand what gay men are like - and they meant this in a positive way. Boys in the Band is about how being excessively bitchy is a cover to hide self-loathing and an awareness that you will never truly live life. The same people who claim Buttigieg is self-loathing and a liar are more than happy to celebrate the self-loathing that Mora vomited all over Twitter, because he's the "right" kind of gay. 

 

This is what happens when rich, out of touch white leftists who openly and happily talk about how much they hate everything and everyone (other than dictators and getting money from podcast groupies) and how "liberals" are the biggest danger in the world have so much power in a campaign. And most of America, the America that they say they hate yet decided to jump into the politics of all while doing nothing but helping their dear leader lose. At least genuine anarchists like John Reed and Emma Goldman tried to go see what they were preaching and supporting. Chapo types, or Red Scare types, are just posers and con artists, like Bernie is. They are all play-acting, and they don't care if we all die. And somehow, the party is so weak and decrepit that this amdram shambles is going to just keep barreling toward the nomination and toward a heavy loss in November. 

 

But at least we have debate #485734 tonight so everyone can be reminded of how godawful these candidates are and why they shouldn't even bother voting, so...yippee!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Here's my question: what kind of judges do you think Bernie would name? Let's say we lose RBG and Clarence Thomas. (Thomas is up there in age so the next president might name his replacement.) Is there any reason to believe that Bernie would name good judges? He never talks about the judiciary so I doubt he has a list of potential SCOTUS nominees. (I suspect that only Biden and Warren have given it any serious thought.) 

 

Bernie would do the same thing Trump did: he would outsource the picking of judges - SCOTUS and otherwise - to whatever idiot sycophant wanted the job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members


Yasss! Okay God, you’re setting this up nicely but I‘ma need you to kick it into high gear now. Meanwhile, I could totally see a stroke or another heart attack for Bernie and an aneurism for Biden. Before you know it, it’ll be the Openly Gay vs the Closeted Gay going to head to head. 
 

I’m kidding. I’d rather it be Elizabeth against Closet Case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Warren is kicking ass tonight. Even Joe is occasionally getting off a good one. Sadly I don't feel it'll change trajectory.

 

Bernie got hit on his gun control record and pivoted to Biden and Wall Street, and was shocked to be booed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm back! We are back! Me and my husband are finally back at our favorite hobby! How could I postpone returning to this amazing show for so long??? What was I thinking??? Another World - February 2nd, 1989 The dead will revenge the living 

      Please register in order to view this content

      Bay City better be ready, because I'm back!   At Vicky's apartment she is once again drowning in doubts and jealousy. Deep down she realizes that her dream wedding will be a farce and nothing can change that. Bridget tries to calm her down, but the heroine is determined to suffer. She is not hearing any positive thoughts. She doesn't believe Jamie will marry her. At the Cory Publishing building another farce is in process. Iris, once again pretending to be the angel of love and sisterhood... is telling Mac and Rachel some wonderful news. When Iris has good news, you really need to look out for yourself. That's when things are bad. So what are the news? Miss Devil has put Amanda up for an award! Mac is smiling from ear to ear, and Rachel is suspicious. Maybe that's the effect Iris is looking for. To once again accent on the fact that Rachel doubts and criticizes her daughter. Iris will do anything to destabilize their relationship. She is like a cancer. Back to Vicky! Jamie is at the door. Looking like a sad puppy, he has come with a surprise. No, he is not gonna leave her and her unborn... Not yet. He has bought her earrings. Sad face. How nice. NOT. Victoria, of course... manages to break one of them the moment she touches it. Bad premonition maybe? She was back in hysterics. It's not easy to trap a man into marriage. Then you have to live with someone that didn't want you in the first place.  We were introduced to a new character (to me at least she is new) - Cass's sister - Stacey. She is giving me "hidden skeletons in the closet"-vibes. Love a girl like that. Stunning actress. I like her. The highlight of the episode was the strange and creepy reveal of Evan the escort... hugging someone named Janice's grave. I remember she had an issue with Rachel... and Rachel killed her in self defense I think... It was hinted in prior episodes, but I lack the context and story. I just know that everyone at the Frame house was mad that Rachel killed the bish. But I also got the impression that this Janice was sick in the head. So Evan is now talking to her grave and telling her he is going to ruin Rachel's life basically. Oh, Evan... I liked you better as a sexy gigolo.  Overall - 10/10 - how can I rate it lower when I haven't watched in months!!!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Once again, Marlena and Kayla were used very effectively and I couldn’t be happier.  Marlena counseling Johnny and then Chanel was the best part of today. They’re really delving into the human emotion of this storyline and I think that’s a good thing. It feels so much mature than it was before. EJ’s fear about what could happen to Johnny if he doesn’t let go of his anger could lead to some really good storylines in the future.  I also really appreciate the way that Paula/Jeanne are mixing it up and having different characters interact with each other. It was nice to see Shawn and Johnny remember that they’re cousins and share a scene together. I liked the parallel that was drawn between the two of them, and what’s going on with their fathers. I did have mixed feelings about everything with Cat though. I enjoyed Chanel warning her about EJ, mostly because it played into the way that she was written today. But I wasn’t the biggest fan of the Chad/EJ scenes. The two of them discussing Chad’s potential feelings for Cat didn’t really keep my interest.  But above all, I feel that everyone is being used more effectively and that we’re getting a better understanding of everyone as well. And that was exactly what Days needed.  
    • It's a wild story for sure, especially the final conclusion (and fireworks offcamera, like Victoria Wyndham tearing into Michael Logan).
    • @I Am A Swede @DRW50  

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I did some research and the story wrapped up with Eric,a caretaker responsible for Georgina's death who then  tried to do away with Laurie but a vision of Georgina spooked him and he smashed into a mirror, dying of glass wounds. So there was a supernatural element. I wonder if the Brody character in the credits was Eric Brody?
    • AI has it wrong. David was working as an aide at PV Hospital due to failing to save his brother's life and refusing to continue as a doctor. His true profession was revealed later. Edna had divorced him while he was in Vietnam and he had no reason to be in contact with her. He had no idea that he had a daughter.  Ruth was Ruth Martin, she was still married to Joe, not Jeff. He was not deceiving Ruth as he believed that Edna was his ex. The poisoning story happened late in his run and probably introduced when they knew Gleason was leaving. AI's interpretation of him as conniving seems to based on that short lived poisoning story and other misinformation. For most of 76 he was involved in the Ruth/Joe triangle to the point where Ruth was ready to divorce Joe and leave town. Joe had to have surgery, David operated and Ruth suddenly realized she wanted to stay with Joe despite all the problems they'd been happening. David then got involved with Christina with Jeff and then Edna as complications. And he arrived late 75 not 76.
    • Interesting that they started going into a supernatural direction with ghosts - I don't think they really did that before? I wonder if it was a response to getting put so late in the afternoon and I guess trying to appeal to that former Dark Shadows audience? 
    • That makes sense then! Is there a place where you can read more Daytime Serial Newsletters? They sound very informative. Thank you

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy