Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5991

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3465

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

This is one of the most ridiculous hit pieces I have read recently. I was kind of hoping Rep Omar would kind of step back after some mis-steps but all this is now showing me who the real bigots are. 

 

I am not an Intercept fan(Greenwald is a crybaby propagandist) but I do love Mehdi Hasan who by the way did criticize Omar's tweets originally, has criticized Corbyn for his missteps, but vehemently opposes the idea that either are anti Semitic. I think this column nails it.

https://theintercept.com/2019/03/05/republicans-and-democrats-say-their-criticism-of-ilhan-omar-is-about-anti-semitism-theyre-gaslighting-you/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think instead I'll listen to Jews when it comes to what constitutes antisemitism. On Corbyn for example:

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/more-than-85-per-cent-of-british-jews-think-jeremy-corbyn-is-antisemitic-1.469654

 

 

 I'm not buying that Omar is just stepping into one antisemitic comment after the next accidentally. The duel loyalty comments? I mean, come on.  I would say it's classic Nazi propaganda, but they didn't invent it either.

 

In addition it's entirely possible for Omar to be antisemitic while some of the people coming after her are Islamophobic or people trying to use her as a wedge.  In fact, I'd say it's pretty obvious that's what's happening. There are plenty of "real" bigots to go around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ok Ilikely agree with you on part of this regarding Omar but there have been plenty of folks of Jewish faith Yair Rosenberg for one who’s crticized her tweets but have indicated she is correct about AIPAC and the Saudi lobbying groups she mentioned.

 

I just can’t get outraged when the same folks turn away with the anti Semitic , islamaphobic, and racist “trope” peddled by those who are now waving their finger at her or the Jim Jordan’s and Mark Meadows of the world who live in this stuff daily. The comparison to King is nonsense frankly as King has sat in congress under both democratic and republican control for years and they did nothing .until this year about him.

 

As far as Corbyn, I find it really diffiicult to find any news source that says anything positive about him anywhere that doesn’t also justify May, the Torres, and their own support for Victor Orban in Hungary and Duda in Poland, so it’s always hard for me to judge what’s fact or propaganda in the UK.

 

That all said there is no question anti Semitism is on the rise all over and definitely in Europe. The Yellow Vest movement in France had cases of personal attacks and Jewish cemeteries desecrated . And I am not justifying Corbyn or Labor for that matter, Labor PMs left the party partially due to this issue a couple of weeks back, but there is a huge media bias in the UK worse than here, that frankly doesn't even touch on the abuses the Tories have perpetrated and how they cozy up to the likes of Orban and Duda. And UKIP is a whole other story.

Edited by JaneAusten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

This is pretty much what I've been saying all along.  It sucks that we have to look to another white male to "save" us, but that's where the current administration has put us.  (Not that Trump losing in 2020 is guaranteed, but thinking outside the proverbial box with another woman or even person of color to oppose him will result only in another four years with that idiot.)

 

Thanks much, @marceline, for sharing!  

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really don't want Biden but Id be ok with Biden/Harris. But I think a steady calming influence might be what.s needed. Im just afraid with Biden it would be SSDD. This country has so many institutional problems that were broken long before Trump. Biden doesn't seem like anyone interested in reform more like going back to the same. 

Edited by JaneAusten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Me neither, but it's just like what you said: we're going to need a "steady, calming influence" and a return to "business as usual," but not in the Trumpian sense, lol.  I think I've said before that I don't expect to see another president like Obama in my lifetime, and that opinion still holds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have my issues with Biden but I believe he'd be a good president. He'd do a good job helping to repair our alliances around the world, he'd help reinstitute a lot of Obama's climate policy that Trump gutted, and given that he considered selling his house to help pay for his son's cancer treatment he could do wonders for the conversation around universal health care.

 

Let's be honest, Trump was elected as revenge for Obama. The people stanning for Kamala Harris are basically doing it because they want to elect her as revenge for Trump. (Disclaimer: I think Harris is fantastic but I didn't want her to run.) With Obama we were poised to move this country into the future. Trump was elected to drag it back into the past.

 

That thread points to something else I've been saying. All this talk of "pushing" the Democratic Party left is really just an attempt to gentrify it and refocus it on the economic priorities of white millennials at the expense of the civil rights of marginalized groups. Like it or not, any Dem nominee will have to win black voters in the south. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This is (maybe) overly simplistic and nonsoapy, but Doug needs to go to Gamblers Anonymous, to deal with the addictive neurological excitement hits that gambling gives him - and which control his life. Vanessa needs to go to therapy to find ways to remain healthfully lusty and sex-positive, but to stay away from anyone who would demean her.
    • YT keeps commending GL clips to me. I discovered Kathleen Cullen was on in Christmas 1987. Was there any talk of making it permanent  or was this just a special visit? I wish they had made the visit permanent. I liked her chemistry with Grant Aleksander.  
    • I'm not sure it's as unpopular as you think.  I just think the show knew they were in a bind, and needed a proven couple for the viewers to invest in. Trying to reunite Vanessa and Ross had just failed in 87. I don't think Ed and Holly's affair was well received, as Simon and Garrett had a brother/sister chemistry. Enter Billy and Vanessa, who give you history and an out not to try and do a Josh/Reva/Billy triangle, which would've really wrecked the relationship between Josh and Billy. I'd have been ok with trying Vanessa/Ross again, and doing a Vanessa/Ross/Holly/Billy quad for a while. I hated Nadine. HATED. She had to be the most insufferable also-ran before ATWT's Julia Lindsay. This is where I wish I knew Roger's history better.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • GROSS. Michael Swan was hot back in his ATWT days. Now he's 76 and WAY past his hot years.    
    • Since she kidnapped, locked up and tried to kill her father's wife I'd say that is still a pretty big deal
    • I'm good with the gushing, too. There aren't many soap icons like John Black, and that's important to celebrate and remember. And yes, life does go on for other characters, but as they say, timing is everything. Going sky diving the day before the funeral? And during a week of shows that were so powerful emotionally? No.    
    • No. There might have been a slight pause for dramatic effect after his "death," but pretty soon after they showed him in France getting plastic surgery and getting involved with his doctor, then planning with her to bring Christina to France. (She thought he had good reason to do it; she wasn't a bad person or anything). Now that I think of it, there must have been some kind of pause before that, during the 70s. Rita was accused of killing a private patient for an inheritance when she lived in Texas. Part of the backstory was that Roger had been there, too. Not sure exactly when or how long that was.
    • I've already stated that I don't like Doug being written as this meek and submissive. It was so lame watching him leave her like that. Vanessa can divorce him, but she then needs to get her thot ass into therapy. She's not only having sex with every guy she runs into, but is now having  sex with a skeevy perv on a poker table. I'm going to give the BTG some credit here. For months, many on this board were delighting in the Vanessa/Joey flirting and what they saw as chemistry. I think we're now seeing what the writers always intended -- that Joey is a disgusting POS wannabe mobster.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy