Jump to content

Knots Landing


Sedrick

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

When you think of KL, you think of two moments in particular: when Ciji Dunne's lifeless body washes up on the shore; and when Val comes face-to-face with her twins for the first time since their birth.  Two seminal moments in the show's history that prove why KL was, in many ways, the best of the '80's primetime soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's why the storyline with Val's twins was wrapped up so quickly in the next season.  David Jacobs wanted it over and done with, even though Michael Filerman rightly knew that keeping it going for a while would help the show's ratings.

I'm no psychoanalyst, but I think Jacobs viewed himself deep down as a sellout.  He wanted to produce artful shows that would win tons of awards and lavish praise from the press.  Instead, he became successful producing stuff that, to his mind, was the equivalent of dime store novels.  I don't think he ever totally appreciated just how much his shows meant to a generation of viewers.  To me, that's the great tragedy of his life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know about anyone else, but to me Knots Landing starting tanking in the aftermath of Val's babies. Empire Valley became a mess and Joshua's descent into madness and eventual death was difficult to watch.

Edited by kalbir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think he loved the actors, though, more than he loved the storylines; and when I say "the actors," I'm referring to the core group: Michele Lee, Kevin Dobson, Ted Shackelford, Joan Van Ark, William Devane, Donna Mills, etc.

As for DALLAS, I think we all know why he wasn't as enamored with that show as he was with KNOTS: he wanted it to be "Giant" or "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof," with Pam as the central character, but it became all about J.R. instead.

Blame David Paulsen.  As good as he was for DALLAS and, to a lesser extent, for DYNASTY, he was all wrong for KNOTS.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Refresh my memory, please

Abby has the inspired idea in the S6 finale to tell Val that she got the call about the location of the missing twins because someone was asking for Mrs. Ewing, so it gave her plausible deniability.

Then I recall in S7 that Sumner (and his mother) had pages from a journal that could implicate Abby, so she did a bunch of stuff to keep it hidden. Like trick Laura into thinking she was having an affair with Greg.

But, in the end did Abby get away with it or did Gary or Val ever learn her part in the kidnapping?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IIRC, there was a scene, set at some dinner party or function, where Abby, fed up with being blackmailed by so many people, tells all (while wearing a stunning Travilla original, lol).

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not that I recall.  Nobody went to jail or anything; and by this point, people were used to Abby's shenanigans.  The real takeaway was that Abby was back in control after being dominated or manipulated for so long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@te.& @Khan I have to say, I admire that choice.  Abby was constantly compared to JR who got away with tons of BS.  So, it is kind of nice to have a female protagonist who wasn't always punished for their misdeeds.  Abby was a rich powerful woman, and it is refreshing that she was able to benefit from the privileges that she fought so hard to gain.  Especially because the kidnapping was not really directly her fault, it was more of a lie of omission.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Perhaps. But would anyone have wanted The Doctors to turn into what General Hospital ultimately became?  Dear God in Heaven...
    • Thanks @EricMontreal22 that must be one of the last issues. Probably the best soap magazine.
    • I can definitely see that airing the same week as The Love Boat colliding with an iceberg and sinking while crossing the North Atlantic on the Titanic anniversary with a “Who lives and dies?!” Promo next to Mr Belvedere being blackmailed over his wanted fugitive status back in the UK

      Please register in order to view this content

        Agree with you both. I am also going assume that while Hotel may had some big numbers the first 2 seasons BUT the demographics weren’t great. Reason I say this is I distinctly remember my parents watching St Elsewhere and/or The Equalizer after Dynasty.    I still don’t get Hotel’s designation as a primetime soap opera either lol. ABC should have aired Paper Dolls in the 10/9 slot on Wednesdays in the fall of 1984 to give that show some more legs.    Obviously ABC was eyeing a double bill night in the same vein as Dallas & Falcon Crest and that might have worked better than leaving Paper Dolls to the wolves in an untested timeslot.
    • I tend to stay out of EP discussions, simply because I rarely know who EPs when. And they all have their good and bad sides. But how are we supposed to judge JFP on anything other than what we see? I didn't know she was a director or a music director. (and unlike say, Chris Goutman, I never saw her credited as anything other than an EP) Specifically in the matter of casting Crampton, she took credit for it (or at Crampton gave her credit for it, whatever) and it was arguably, one of the worst recasts of the '90's (and either as bad or worse than the actress she fired).  She lost two important actresses in '92 and still decided to kill Maureen.  She had a wildly uneven tenure at GL. It's no wonder she's polarizing. But it kind of proves a point--great soap is always a that rare combination of everything clicking at the same time.  And believe me, if I could bring myself to watch her male successors who were responsible for bringing back Reva and allowing her to eat the show again, or hiring Hunt Block, or being too chicken to stand up to stans who and hamstrung the show with boring couples stuck in the same repetitive stories (Vanessa/Matt, Chelle/Danny or Richard/Cassie, take your pick) not to mention San CristoHELL....I'd be more than happy to roast them on open spits. I guess we end up talking about JFP because she's in a period we can nominally agree was one of the last "best" periods of the show.
    • A degree does not make one an expert at their job, it just shows that you can follow directions from a technical standpoint.  It doesn't mean that they're creative. JFP was all about the look of a show without considering that technical beauty can only carry a show so far if there is nothing interesting to go along with it.  Equality means calling out flaws equally in both genders. 
    • NBC or P&G was even fool enough to take a full page ad for two consecutive weeks in TV Guide promoting this horrible storyline.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • JFP has had more defense for her decades of terrible producing than many male producers ever had.
    • It makes sense that she got a degree in directing. I've always said she should have been a director. I think she works better at the technical aspects of the show. I think her problem is the emotion/heart of a show.  She always guts the heart of the show she's on and she makes decisions that stop longtime viewers from watching a show. I don't think it's sexism to call that out especially as I've said similar things about Conboy. I've called out Rauch for much worse. 
    • "Aunt Blanche" first appears toward the end of this episode, about 57 minutes in.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • You're probably right. They may have just wanted edits of certain characters. Hopefully the rest is around.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy