Vee

Or appropriate the Quartermaine empire. I'll allow it! Lord, did they really have to bring OLTL into it again? Sasha claims Holly left her in Llanview with David Vickers years ago because "Ethan was in trouble". Was Martin claiming Blair slept with David not bad enough?

Baier does an unexpected bit of damage control. I'm surprised they bothered with this with that audience, but it must also be for media who have been very critical of Baier (and complimentary of Harris):

Why this has been a going concern across several writing teams is baffling to me. It's not like they're some controversial frontburner pairing. At least with PM it seemed clear he had intended to dispense with Sasha originally.

It depends on exactly when she auditioned. If we're talking about super close to Y&R it could've been either the Tina recast in summer '94 or (this is my personal suspicion) Angela Holliday in summer '93. I'm sure there's other time intervals or even potential characters from that era but those are the first that come to mind. I suppose she could've also been up for the now infamous Blair racewashing recast (late '93).

Me too. Edward and co. were just too accepting of it. Honestly right now I'm 50/50 that Holly is straight up lying to Sasha for her own reasons. Maybe she doesn't want Cody with her daughter for another purpose, because who exactly would they be pairing either of them with unless this is short term angst? This would also allow them to once again cement the odious pairing of Robert and Diane by painting Holly as the forever deceiver. There is also the fact that (forgive me if this has been mentioned) Sasha swapped in her own hair sample to mask Cody's DNA connection to Mac maybe a year ago. Yet Sasha's showed no Scorpio DNA.

He was on for like 2 days, you didn't miss much. They were all on together, I forgot about that silly caper.

I hated Ethan being forced as Luke's child (something I feel certain TG insisted upon despite several different creative teams feinting at making him Robert's) and I hate the infidelity retcon they crafted for it, but there was a real interval of time where it would work. Here, just like with Dominique and Mac there isn't so far as I can tell. It's just FV and CVE and co. not caring much about the timeline. Holly was onscreen in story for almost all of 1992 to the summer of '93. Like Dominique, there was no viable interval in which she could've carried a child to term. Unless they claim she pulled an Adam Chandler and jacked some of that Scorpio jizz from a sperm bank on her way outta town, which while I could buy the more conniving Holly of the last 20+ years doing it, would be once again ruinous to her character.

They should've let Mulcahey dump this character when he clearly wanted to.

LOL are they trying to suggest Robert cheated on Anna in '92 or is this some more reality-warping bullshít like Dominique and Mac?? Come on now.

There's virtually no difference. They're the same boring, pointless white chick.

It is remarkable how off the wall Bret Baier was on Fox tonight - if you don't watch the whole thing you may not see, but he was filibustering and interrupting Harris even before she could begin to delve into his first question. The story emerging in media seems to be not just that Harris was strong and held her own/did well, but that Baier was way out of line. I wonder if this will ever trigger a reevaluation from the Jake Tappers of the world (or Stelter, who was impressed with Harris) who used to ferociously defend the supposed 'old line' journalists at Fox News.

It's just a desperate attempt to keep another past their sell by date FV/CVE, etc. era character on perpetually. I couldn't care less. Adding a bloodline or pulling a recast on a pointless hire or tired character does nothing. The larger Holly situation doesn't bother me. She's been pretty regularly guesting for the better part of 15 years off and on and they never have done anything as ruinous with her as the original monkey virus story, people seem to enjoy her stints. Holly is not a favorite of mine but it gives Emma Samms work in a difficult time.

No, I think he's just cornered after being asked a dozen times lately and has decided to lean into MAGA and hope for the best.

Not terribly surprising based on what I'd heard of his life and career, but still sad.

There's always going to be spin in either direction - if you ask the Trump campaign it's all about how it's a total disaster, etc. But the mainstream media pundits seems pleased with her going on there and holding strong, as do many or our side. I do think there are more viewers to peel off and penetrate from in that bubble, and Fox cut the interview short. I also think she does better aggressive than trying to play soft.

Meanwhile: