Jump to content

Days of Our Lives: November 2023 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 449
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Under what rock has Gabi been for the past 30+ years to not know that prying a knife out of a victim's back is a bad idea? The knife in her hand didn't even make for good TV. Blood on her hands would have been just as effective.

 

Edited by SFK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's what I don't get.

And correct me if I'm wrong.

Wendy asked Li who stabbed him, then it cut to commercial, then it came back, and he was dead.  Then, on Tuesday, Wendy replied that Li said Gabi did it, but we never saw that within the episode. 

Why didn't they show Li saying who stabbed him?

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That would have been a very large tree.  I think there is a difference in putting, say, Austin or Shawn on it as opposed to Kristen/Theresa/Sloan etc.  I can understand why they cut all the baby daddies and mommies out.

I thought it was incredibly stupid as well.  Everyone knows that's the worst thing to do.

I thought I missed something too.  We didn't hear what he said, but when Wendy said Li said Gabi I thought it cut out too early or I missed a scene.  Guess not.

Edited by carolineg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A John/Marlena episode does always make me happy.  They may be super corny, but they still make me smile.  Is MM already gone?  She couldn't be in this episode too?

I thought EOB was unusually bad as Theresa today.  She's never been good, but today was a big yikes!  I guess the accent is a problem because her line delivery is so breathy and weird.   I honestly don't even know what she's going for as Theresa.  @AbcNbc247is right.  She does seem drunk lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I truly have no idea what she’s going for in the role outside of desperately don’t play Gwen. But it’s an awful take as Theresa especially after the original was just on canvas. I will never understand why they couldn’t just hire a non on canvas actress to take over if they didn’t want to work with Jen Lilley.

Edited by Antoyne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
    • Brandon Tartikoff saved NBC primetime. Brandon Stoddard got ABC Tuesday to rebound and put an end to the Aaron Spelling hit factory.
    • Awwwww Brad. I know I shouldn't, but I feel bad for him 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And yeah, agreed that Dante having animosity towards Gio is very forced and contrived. And it also has me concerned that it means the reveal won't be happening anytime soon.
    • God, I love that woman. Another amazing interview!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy