Jump to content

Y&R October 2022 Discussion Thread


Taoboi

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

LOL no discussion yet? How the mighty has fallen….

I actually like what I’ve been seeing with Nick and Sally. There’s a nice easy chemistry. I doubt they’re long term but should be interesting to see Summer and Phyllis’ reactions. LOL.

Too soon to decide on Tucker 2.0 although I think TSJ played the smugness well.

Noah’s club set continues to look dumb. And why are the main characters in formal attire while the extras are not? 
 

Why is nuttier than a fruitcake Chelsea still this show? The scenes of her screaming (especially that one with Billy) are dumb and corny AF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A bit overplaying but there definitely was some bad blood. Tucker was originally supposed to be a Victor replacement character hence his initial story was deceiving Katherine and a hostile takeover. The character got messy, but overall was pretty much a POS with underhanded tactics ie hostile takeovers of Jabot and Newman, manipulated Sharon into going crazy again, numerous affairs, etc. I do recall Tucker got JT full custody of Reed as JT was working for him, which ended up being a bad thing down the road. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bill Spencer & Tucker McCall were both described as "Richard-Branson-types", but I think the problem is that Branson is not iconic enough to be a recognizable type.  I mean they both dress casually, they had those zen sand trays in their office, and both characters were involved in media companies, but there aren't a lot of defining character traits that one could pin to the CEO of Virgin Media.

If they were Bill-Gates-types or Steve-Jobs-types, then we could expect certain traits  based on those personalities (or lack there of).  But, Branson is not enough to base a character upon.  So, in the end, Tucker was ill-defined and his motives were ever changing.  Hopefully now that he's back (and wearing a tie) we'll get more insight into the character.  Many will scoff, but hope springs eternal.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think Jason might've posted some numbers for the syndication a while ago and the numbers for Falcon Crest was horrible. Like 1.5 rating or something, which was terrible.    ETA: it was actually Paul Raven:   New to syndication 60 min Fall Guy 67 markets 3.1/8 Falcon Crest 110 markets 1.1/5 To get into the top 40, you needed a 4.6/9 rating for reference - and Falcon Crest managed to get into a lot of markets to begin with. In the fall of 1985 Dynasty, Dallas and Knots were syndicated (show / rating / share / coverage % / markets): Dallas 3.4 10 51.7 92 Dynasty 3.4 10 48.7 47  Knots Landing 3.3 10 12.5 20  So, Knots as an example trippled Falcon Crest's rating with 20 markets - I'm sure those were major ones but it just goes to show you how much Falcon Crest bombed in syndication. 
    • It's not bad but the stories move too slow. It's the same problem when Dan O'Connor was CO-HW with Van Etten, they have a million stories and they all drag on endlessly with no resolution. I'd argue the majority of the stories airing now are good but you get sick of waiting months for something to happen.
    • Thanks. I must have missed that period entirely for Lifetime. 
    • Thanks. I know Marland did that type of thing sometimes but it's less likely with these characters. I don't even remember Alex ever mentioning him.
    • French fan summary Rusty took over Simon's job at Lewis Trucking after Simon transferred to Lewis Oil's North Carolina office to live near Jessie and Calla. I doubt they would bother following up a story for offscreen characters eg marriage and a baby.
    • I suspected that the performance with the reveal was the reason why the Ted actor got the axe and it looks like I was right. He wasn't really good at conveying what needed to be conveyed in those scenes. Claybon is at least slowly improving (but I agree that he still needs to work on his line delivery), but I do wonder what will happen when his big reveal is coming up. 
    • I've already asked this before, recently, but can anyone who watched those years more closely tell me if anything said about Jessie and Simon at the end of their profiles is accurate (about them marrying, naming a baby after Brandon/Lujack, etc.)?
    • Nicole is way too smart to not know she was carrying twins - she's a doctor! My guess is that Leslie did abort her baby out of fear, and as payback, stole Ted and Nicole's child (Eva), and stole Kat from another family to replace her in the hospital.
    • Those Soap Central profiles have a lot of incorrect info. According to SOD summaries and the Daytime Newsletter of the time,Tim left town for a new job and Pam reunited with the father of her baby and also departed Springfield.They did not marry.
    • Do we believe that Jabot is at the level of Estee Lauder?? I am on board with Jabot deciding to expand but the way it was handled was ridiculous. Jabot just decided and bingo, that was that. Not months of negotiations and decisions about how it would fit into the Jabot portfolio. And then no follow through. Josh thinks he's serving business stories by characters sitting around and discussing mergers, takeovers and job switching. Now we have Audra setting up her own company -Vibrator or something. Well, why not? You don't need staff, office space or even products.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy