Jump to content

GH: Rumors regarding the vaccine mandate


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 555
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Totally fair.  Not beefing with you either.  I'll be honest and say I don't know or follow SBu really at all and I don't doubt you are 100% correct about the things he has said and his personal beliefs.  His juice stuff alone makes me question his integrity.   I don't consider Jason a huge loss to the show because he's hit or miss for me.  I think I misspoke and was expecting more of a tirade from him and thought 'meh, whatever' on his statement. 

On another note, what would be a medical exemption on this?  Just curious.

Edited by carolineg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Already being immunocomopromised by other ailments or chronically, some patients undergoing cancer or bone marrow treatments, etc.  There are a few actual issues that they have allowed medical exemptions.  I also know people being treated for cancer that their doctors recommended the vaccine.  So it also depends on what type of treatments you are on and your doctor’s risk assessment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What a ridiculous excuse- it’s about personal freedom.  From the mask mandates to vaccination- everything has been about mitigating the illness for you, and even more about protecting those around you.  You know- showing concern and care for the community both small and large.  So your personal freedom is worth more than everyone else?  Bye Steve, I hope they don’t just welcome you back.

He for sure knew his last airdate, because he waited to comment until it happened.  Which may have been mandated by his contract.  I also love Nancy for reiterating these people choose their fate- GH didn’t just let them go.  They chose to leave by not vaccinating.

I wonder if anyone else is out too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know someone in real life who has an autoimmune condition.  She learned that her condition could (*maybe*) have the *potential* to trigger a large reaction to the vaccine (a flare-up of her condition).  Her primary physician says she should get vaccinated anyhow, but she won't.

My take on that: I'd be willing to risk having a big uncomfortable reaction to the vaccine that takes me days (or weeks) to recover from, but from which I will eventually recover and regain equilibrium. I'd prefer the annoyance of that to getting COVID and dying from it, or getting COVID and having longterm aftereffects such as "Long Covid".  And I'd especially get vaccinated so that I can protect anyone I interact with.

In fact, I myself have an autoimmune condition, and I got the shots and the booster, and my doctor told me to get an extra booster (fourth shot) in a few months.  The shots have not triggered any unusual reactions or flare-ups of my condition.

Yes. This.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have an auto immune condition, Interstitial cystitis and I got the vaccine. Not because of my condition, but because it's something that needed done. 

 

THe personal freedom stuff pisses me off. Burton doesn't give a crap he works with elderly and others who could catch covid from him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That’s the other thing all these personal freedom types that lean into how healthy they regularly are- we don’t know exactly what the long term effects of even a mild case are going to be down the line.  This could very easily cause respiratory issues later, and who knows what else.  Just because your case was mild doesn’t mean it won’t possibly have repercussions down the road.

It took about a decade for it to be widely known and acted upon that exposure during 9/11 had been causing multiple health issues to survivors, first responders, even to search and rescue dogs.

Personally I am just sick of this.  Just try to do the best for you but also for those in your community!  I’m not religious at all, but all these conservatives claiming Christianity really need to start believing the crap they hurl my way on many occasions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I tried following the news in Los Angeles at https://laist.com (independent public radio and news) They had up-to-the minute accurate info during the wildfires in January. There's no video, no impact to my mind as to what's happening. Trying other outlets, to get the truth, but it's hard.  
    • That's a bit murky since that happened during a writers' strike. Assuming Kristen Marie had a 2-year contract she left about when her contract would have expired and Sharlene and Josie showed up right before that. Lemay was officially credited as HW from September 1988 but it seems very probable that his anticipated tenure influenced events that happened during the strike which started in April. 
    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy