Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I also don't think she worked with great writers again after Curlee/Demorest at GL. The fact that she still singles out that time in her career for writing says a lot - she was able to bulldoze over other writers or was given very poor ones to execute her many mandates since then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

 

There's also the fact that she and Megan McTavish became a package deal, bc Megan would facilitate for her at OLTL and GH. Before the network made her hire Megan, Jill was ghostwriting OLTL herself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Blackout was a perfect plot driven event- because all the characters were in different or pivotal situations but they were so well defined and the writing was strong it all worked.

 

I preferred the show under Calhoun- it was brighter without looking cheap or garish, and Mindy, Blake, and Alexandra were played by great actors who were compelling.  And there was still a sense of fun at times.  JFP rarely does fun.  It’s almost always deadly serious with her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What was so great about the blackout? 

 

The ratings great? It was down from the week before with a 5.6 rating.  I guess it was a success because it ranked #4 among the soaps and beat GH?

Edited by Soapsuds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 
It’s considered a landmark event for GL that had storyline repercussions for years to come, probably the biggest being Ross & Blake(Sherry was still in the role at time) as so many storylines climaxed under one event. It received widespread critical acclaim including GL winning a Best Writing Emmy for it.
 

And if GL tied at #4 at a 5.6 that week with GH that also shows how many soaps were in the crapper at the time still trying to coast off the 80’s (hello Days!). It was a year before quite a few soaps found their 90’s revival kick in while GL stumbled by the start of 1994. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Fall 1990 to end of 1992 Days was that transition period between the supercouple era and Reilly's sci-fi era. It's one of those periods that's not really talked about much.

Edited by kalbir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

where oh where to start…

 

there’s drw50’s observation in the doug davidson thread:

 

“The likes of Hogan, Guza, JFP, Logan, Hinsey, etc. could never get past their inherent disdain for and shame for soaps, shame that they had to cover or work in the genre. And this shame and self-hatred helped to kill the work of generations of artists.”

 

but it’s more than disdain and shame, not to mention contempt. so much of what jfp said to locher revealed a profound lack of understanding of why many viewers watch soaps. but, i’m only going to mention a couple.

 

she talked about how she liked baby showers and all that, but viewers didn’t care about baby showers unless there was a bomb under the bassinet.

 

well, no…

 

i took ‘baby shower’ as shorthand for the one reason many  viewers do watch soaps:

 

to spend time with familiar characters over years, if not decades — characters who develop and grow a bit, who change and age — sharing scenes that don’t necessarily move the story along, but are great moments of character revelation, humor, and yes, sometimes sadness. no bombs necessary.

 

which brings me to her comments equating ‘friends of jill’ with the late steven bochco’s fondness for finding roles for actors he’d worked with when he created new shows.

 

again, a lack of understanding about how fundamental familiarity is to soap fans. not to say shows shouldn’t change. but change doesn’t mean refocusing the show on, for example, the rappaports on oltl, leaving fans angrily wondering what happened to the rest of the characters.

 

who knows — she might have done well creating her own show. but to not understand how what she did differed from bochco…

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I thought the baby shower hypothetical was very revealing. It's a complete misunderstanding of the genre. The idea of a bomb under the bassinet strikes me as stupid, cheap, garbage, plot-oriented writing, not interesting or exciting. It's the type of writing that made me give up on certain shows over the years. But I'd totally watch a baby shower where the characters are written in character, exchanging good barbs and knowing glances... imagine B&B's Stephanie being forced to throw one for Brooke. That would be fantastic television. I'd be riveted. 

 

Another thing that struck me was when she said she came to GL and there was a producer that helped her a lot because they knew the history of the show very well and really helped her understand the layout of the show. Then when she went to AW she brought that person with her because they were so great. That does nothing for AW and AW's fans, who want someone that understands THEIR show.

Edited by BoldRestless
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This literally hurt my soul to hear. As a child, it was the haunting, continuous background music of shows as different in style as Y&R, AMC, GH, Santa Barbara and Days which drew me in! Y&R's music was cinematic, orchestral, moving, and it did an incredible job of adding psychological dimension to the characters onscreen. Bill Bell had an enduring fascination with psychology (especially women's) and why people desire the things they do (which stemmed from his days as an advertising executive when the ad agencies hired Freudian psychiatrists to help sharpen their campaigns). And the music used for Y&R and B&B was there specifically to heighten non-verbal, illogical shifts in a character's mood or emotions. 

 

It's been so long, but i still boil when i think that JFP had the *arrogance* to smear her bland, generic, crappy taste in music, furnishings and costume all over this #1 show. She effectively turned it into a standardised amalgam of the past shows she worked on. She sucked the oxygen out of it, and it has never recovered since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The baby shower thing was just stupid.  Drama, especially soaps builds towards a payoff.  Moments to breath and showing aspects of life like joy and community are pivotal when the payoff requires an emotional reaction.  And back in the day, a beloved couple having a child was a payoff, because the audience wanted to see them, and tuned in.

 

Again- for all the lessons learned from Monty, she missed some of the big ones.  Gloria Monty irrevocably changed GH, YMMV on if it was for the better.  But they always had a human story going while the action adventure stuff was going on.  Characters like Bobbie, Tony, Lucy, the Quartermaines, the Webber family- they were rarely in the full mix of the action storylines and were often involved in hospital stuff, affairs, raising families, etc.  When everything is a bomb under the bassinet then nothing really matters anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And in the end, what's the difference between setting scenes at a baby shower, at a restaurant or at the hospital? The fact that people would have to specifically interact with each other? 

 

Give me ten females throwing barbs, pissy looks, and trying to keep the cake from being destroyed over a bomb anyday.

Edited by P.J.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm okay with a bomb under the bassinet..once in a while...remember the days when it was during sweeps week and there were months and months of lead up to that bomb, and why we should care...(I remember on AMC Ray Gardner had planted a bomb in the Martin's basement on Thanksgiving or Christmas and it was very, very tense...(even if we knew AMC was not going to kill the Martins and their friends on a holiday) as we knew the characters and there was a lead up to it.  Soaps forgot self control and pacing..so Reva was in danger every other week and we could care less.

 

This..that is why shows had a "boring" core family like the Hughes and Bauers. They were aspirational (upper middle class professionals) but not out of reach (mulit billionaires) and they had "normal" lives that helped ground the show. Being raised on the PG shows it was still easy to get into Monty's GH as they had a core family, celebrated the holidays, etc. I read once Monty wanted to fuse "Irna Phillips with the Edge of Night".

 

I would be rooting for the fire..I can't imagine Carly would be in danger when she can chew the scenery and chew her way out of that toy chest.

 

Again, when Phelps has good writers and lets them write she can be good. A couple of years of her GL were perfect soap and it did balance big events with the Bauer kitchen. It was when Curlee left and Deas started eating the show that GL died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • April 2025 Episode Rankings A total of 22 Episodes aired this Month Thanks as always @jcar03!  1.) Jacqueline Maclnnes Wood (Steffy Forrester Finnegan) : 17 2.) Katherine Kelly Lang (Brooke Logan Forrester) : 14 3.) Scott Clifton (Liam Spencer) : 13 *.) Lawrence St. Victor (Carter Walton) : 13 5.) Thorsten Kaye (Ridge Forrester) : 12 *.) Tanner Novlan (Dr. John "Finn" Finnegan) : 12 7.) Murielle Hilaire (Daphne Rose) : 11 8.) Sean Kanan (Deacon Sharpe) : 10 *.) Annika Noelle (Hope Logan) : 10 10.) Kimberlin Brown (Sheila Carter) : 9 *.) Dr. Taylor Hayes (Rebecca Budig) : 9 *.) Laneya Grace (Electra Forrester) : 9 *.) Crew Morrow (Will Spencer) : 9 14.) Heather Tom (Katie Logan) : 8 *.) Lisa Yamada (Luna Nozawa) : 8 16.) Cassandra Creech (Dr. Grace Buckingham) : 7 *.) Sophia Paras (Kelly Spencer) : 7 18.) John McCook (Eric Forrester): 6 *.) Delon de Metz (Zende Forrester Dominguez) : 6 20.) Ashleigh Brewer (Ivy Forrester) : 5 21.) Ashley Jones (Dr. Bridget Forrester) : 4 22.) Don Diamont (Bill Spencer) : 3 *.) Lauralee Bell (Christine Blair) : 3 *.) Jennifer Gareis (Donna Logan Forrester) : 3 *.) Heidi Montag (Herself) : 3 *.) Spencer Pratt (Himself) : 3 *.) Markell Washington (Himself) : 3 28.) Romy Park (Poppy Nozawa) : 2 *.) Dick Christie (Charlie Webber) : 2 *.) Naomi Matsuda (Li Finnegan) : 2 31.) Samantha Cutaran (Nurse R. Rose) : 1 *.) Kitty Davis (911 Operator) : 1 *.) Emily Kasprzyk (Paramedic #2) : 1 *.) Jordan Jamal Mayfield (Paramedic #1) : 1 *.) Jake Osgood (Waiter) : 1  
    • Perhaps. But would anyone have wanted The Doctors to turn into what General Hospital ultimately became?  Dear God in Heaven...
    • Thanks @EricMontreal22 that must be one of the last issues. Probably the best soap magazine.
    • I can definitely see that airing the same week as The Love Boat colliding with an iceberg and sinking while crossing the North Atlantic on the Titanic anniversary with a “Who lives and dies?!” Promo next to Mr Belvedere being blackmailed over his wanted fugitive status back in the UK

      Please register in order to view this content

        Agree with you both. I am also going assume that while Hotel may had some big numbers the first 2 seasons BUT the demographics weren’t great. Reason I say this is I distinctly remember my parents watching St Elsewhere and/or The Equalizer after Dynasty.    I still don’t get Hotel’s designation as a primetime soap opera either lol. ABC should have aired Paper Dolls in the 10/9 slot on Wednesdays in the fall of 1984 to give that show some more legs.    Obviously ABC was eyeing a double bill night in the same vein as Dallas & Falcon Crest and that might have worked better than leaving Paper Dolls to the wolves in an untested timeslot.
    • I tend to stay out of EP discussions, simply because I rarely know who EPs when. And they all have their good and bad sides. But how are we supposed to judge JFP on anything other than what we see? I didn't know she was a director or a music director. (and unlike say, Chris Goutman, I never saw her credited as anything other than an EP) Specifically in the matter of casting Crampton, she took credit for it (or at Crampton gave her credit for it, whatever) and it was arguably, one of the worst recasts of the '90's (and either as bad or worse than the actress she fired).  She lost two important actresses in '92 and still decided to kill Maureen.  She had a wildly uneven tenure at GL. It's no wonder she's polarizing. But it kind of proves a point--great soap is always a that rare combination of everything clicking at the same time.  And believe me, if I could bring myself to watch her male successors who were responsible for bringing back Reva and allowing her to eat the show again, or hiring Hunt Block, or being too chicken to stand up to stans who and hamstrung the show with boring couples stuck in the same repetitive stories (Vanessa/Matt, Chelle/Danny or Richard/Cassie, take your pick) not to mention San CristoHELL....I'd be more than happy to roast them on open spits. I guess we end up talking about JFP because she's in a period we can nominally agree was one of the last "best" periods of the show.
    • A degree does not make one an expert at their job, it just shows that you can follow directions from a technical standpoint.  It doesn't mean that they're creative. JFP was all about the look of a show without considering that technical beauty can only carry a show so far if there is nothing interesting to go along with it.  Equality means calling out flaws equally in both genders. 
    • NBC or P&G was even fool enough to take a full page ad for two consecutive weeks in TV Guide promoting this horrible storyline.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • JFP has had more defense for her decades of terrible producing than many male producers ever had.
    • It makes sense that she got a degree in directing. I've always said she should have been a director. I think she works better at the technical aspects of the show. I think her problem is the emotion/heart of a show.  She always guts the heart of the show she's on and she makes decisions that stop longtime viewers from watching a show. I don't think it's sexism to call that out especially as I've said similar things about Conboy. I've called out Rauch for much worse. 
    • "Aunt Blanche" first appears toward the end of this episode, about 57 minutes in.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy