Jump to content

B&B: February 2019 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

These shows are just not interesting. I now have to go out of my way to watch soaps, and it’s just not worth it given the plethora of options. Criterion Channel launches their new streaming service April 8, and it’s a wrap after that. The KSJ memorial on Y&R is the only thing that I’ll watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me so far that's what it will be.  Taylor not letting go of trying to pair Liam and Steffy together, pushing Hope to Thomas, etc...Ridge will get mad that Brooke is mad that Hope has willingly chosen Thomas and will turn to Taylor.  Then at that point Katie will be back with Bill and Slut from the Valley will go after Bill again because he really did "become a changed man", and even at her age, her vagina is extremely thirsty and she has no problem stealing Katie's love interests. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think you nailed it.

 

As much as it burned me to agree with much of what Brooke was saying during her and Taylor's argument today, the way she kept touching and grabbing Taylor's face, I don't know if I would have shown the same restraint as Taylor.  Even if Brooke was justified. LOL!  I  would have actually understood if Brooke gave Taylor a classic "Staphanie slap" at that moment, but there was just something about how she touched Taylor's forehead and grabbed her chin that rubbed me the wrong way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B used to be entertaining. Whoever is writing B&B (Brad Bell still presumably) seems to be working overtime to get it canceled. How many more years can the fans take of the same thing: Hope/Liam/Steffy, Ridge/Taylor/Brooke, random couple combos and plots fueled off of romance alone. Mix it up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm so tired of hearing Taylor and a couple other characters with the continual "Steffy is all alone to take care of the 2 baby girls.  She needs help."  Where is Taylor living?  Didn't she move in with Steffy?  Didn't Steffy have a Nanny - God knows how she affords one. (cough cough).  And didn't she willingly adopt Phoebe, and isn't Taylor the one who got Phoebe????   I know the answer to most of these, other than where Taylor is living - because I remember Steffy asking her to move in.

 

So why is everyone lamenting poor Steffy with the 2 babies?  She's the one who wanted a 2nd one, so cope with it.  LOL.  I think Brooke said yesterday something about  - she got what she wanted....I'd have to agree with that.  Funny with Brooke and Taylor...Brooke makes it seem like they're so different.  They're basically the same character...meddling man-stealing mothers trying to get their daughters whatever they want. 

 

And the writing is so all over the map...manufacturing a story for Quinn now to meddle in Wyatt's relationship with Sally for no reason.  She's never had an issue with Sally that I remember and then in 2 scenes before was all with the Forresters trying to get Sally to stay and not leave the company, and in the next scene is trying to drive a wedge between her and Wyatt...???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This show remains ridiculous.  Since when can't a woman take care of 2 children?  And since when can't an independently wealthy woman take care of 2 children?  Not to mention, Steffy adopted the second kid so she's more than prepared.  

 

This show is just trash!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The whole pity party for Steffy raising two babies on her "own" has been annoying.  First off, she CHOSE to adopt another baby after just having one and being single.  Second, she has all these resources (family, money) available to help her.  But what annoys me the most is the show made this big deal about her choosing to be single and not going after a man and being independent, and then they just dismantle all that character building for THE triangle. 

 

As for Taylor and the rest of the veteran characters, I guess I have to accept that from here on out they only exist to serve as props for their children and grandchildren.  They've all become one note, narrow-minded characters who are way too fixated on their grown *** children's lives, and they only share scenes together to talk about those children under the false perception of them having their own story.  Eric had long ago been put out to this pasture, but now every character over 30 seems to be joining him.  Brooke, Ridge, Taylor, Quinn, Bill, Katie ... even Rick and Maya were/have been shoved out to pasture in recent years.  I wonder if all soaps are like this now, since I only watch this one.  It's a shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Just watched the episode concerning Olivia's drug use and Abby's persistence, etc. Donna Mills did stellar work in this episode, as did Tonya Crowe and Brian Austin Green (Brian).
    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy