Jump to content

Did the focus on appealing to housewives kill US Soaps?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Obviously Passions went after that young demo in the (misguided) belief that they would stick with the show and move to the coveted 18 - 49 demo.

But youngsters are fickle beings and any appeal Passions had for them cooled off.

So TPTB had to find the next gimmick to attract the next set of young viewers.

But that strategy didn't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members


100% false because teenagers will binge watch the shows they like for hours. Stranger Things, 13 Reasons Why, Riverdale, and a ton of other shows that are popular with mainstream adult audiences owe a lot to the younger demo who has no problem plowing through an entire season in one or two sittings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not the audience at all. The soaps failed to evolve during and after the OJ trial as well as during the rise of the Jerry Springer Show and the revamped Maury Povich show in the late 90s/early 2000s. All 4 soaps continue to fail to keep up with the times plus the bad writing/execs that kept medding with the creative process brought us to this current juncture. 

 

Why watch a bad soap when you can get a drama/tomfoolery fix in 15 min segments on Jerry and Maury and in hour form via Love and Hip Hop/Real Housewives/Basketball Wives?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

What was Downton Abbey, if not a soap?  Even Julian Fellows says so.

Some of the storylines stretched out over quite a bit of time (Bates' wrongful conviction) before they were resolved.  DA did high ratings among various age groups and the 18-34 demo was one of their most loyal. 

 

If the stories are compelling, (DA had an effective blending of multi-generational storytelling and use of characters of various age groups) people will stay but one cannot commit the egregious error of having long-winded storylines with no payoff.  

I gave up on Y&R because not only are the stories horribly written but the payoff is next to nil.  Also, Mal Young cannot write a proper reversal to save his life!

 

Back to the OT though.  After the 80s were over, I don't see the soaps as doing anything in particular to cater to housewives.  What the soap industry failed to do (and still fails to do) is to properly account for time shifting with their advertisers. When I was about 10, I learned how to program a VCR and used to set the timer to record my mother's favorite soaps as she had to work outside the home. I did this until I went off to college in the 1990s.  I know my mother far from the only one watching this way and the soap industry, in all likelihood knew this as well but never found a way to reconcile and monetize this aspect with their advertisers.  With DVR, the soaps still struggle with this.

 

Judging from the decline in storytelling during the time of the OJ Simpson trial, many of the soaps didn't make much of an effort to appeal to anyone.  IMO, they miscalculated in assuming that they could write 'placeholder' stories and the lapsed viewers would come flocking back once the Simpson trial had ended. Many never did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some context but nothing most of y’all don’t already know: Percentages of mothers who were stay-at-home moms over time. Interestingly, the percentage of mothers with children under 18 who didn’t work outside the home reached its lowest point, 23 percent, in 1999 when Passions, the last totally new network daytime soap, debuted. That was down from roughly half of all mothers in 1967.

 

Numbers rebounded over the next decade or so to 29 percent in 2012. (Note: the data are percentages of mothers 18-69 with minor children in their households, not all adult women.)

http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/04/08/after-decades-of-decline-a-rise-in-stay-at-home-mothers/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would agree with many of you that the audience is not to blame. 

 

When an audience falls out of love with a show, there's a reason. The customer is always right! 

 

I also do not believe that targeting 'housewives' was the wrong move either. Females are discerning and committed TV viewers. And so are soap's male fans, including many gay men, and its African-American fans. Many of you who post here on SON fit those latter demos -- demos TPTB choose to pretty much gloss over.

 

One problem is that most women work and therefore do not stay home to watch soaps. DVR is the way around that, though. But the target demo is DVRing other shows!

 

The real problem is the people running Daytime. 'They have failed to evolve with the times' -- sure, that's a big part of it. How many times have soaps gone to the baby-switch well? What a useless SL that has no relation to 99% of peoples' lives.

 

However, the real reason is TPTBwho are lazy, mediocre and underachieving. If they disdain we viewers to the point of throwing just any old crap on screen, why should we honor them with our viewership?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Exactly. "They're dumb hicks in our secondary markets! They'll watch any old crap."

 

TPTB use the idea that 'viewers expect us to do this' as an excuse for their laziness and lack of imagination. The formula/template is making us do this!

 

And yet the formula/template is THRIVING in other genres -- in Primetime, on cable, on Netflix. The continuing story... of Another World is continuing on almost every comedic, dramatic and reality show out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the reason why baby switch storylines see rating increases isn’t because the audience just loves them.  I think it’s literally the only long term things these crappy execs and writers still write for.  The build build build then climax with emotional stakes is what people respond to.  Soaps need that cliff hanger storytelling in as many stories as possible.  Instead they just limp day by day until they stumble on a who’s the daddy or baby switch.

 

It’s the only story template their brains can still do this with. They have even given up on building to a wedding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Valerie Mahaffey Dead: ‘Northern Exposure,’ ‘Dead to Me’ Actress Was 71 Loved her. I've never seen her Doctors work. 
    • Valerie Mahaffey Dead: ‘Northern Exposure,’ ‘Dead to Me’ Actress Was 71 I just loved Valerie on my early '90s TV shows. This one gets me. 
    • I assume they did at some point during the finale...
    • Kelly was a horribly-written character overall. Just think, two Emmy-winning actresses (including Cynthia Watros, Nina, GH, and Annie, GL) couldn't make it work. Pamela is campy, but so are Dani, Vanessa, Leslie, and Joey. And, I don't want to be too judgy because my love for camp changes depending on the show. OLTL, DAYS, and some eras of GH had me rolling with the camp. However, Passions was overkill and I hated it. And, here, I can take it or leave it. It's ok in small doses (note to RC). I see this show as more of a serious drama.
    • I think one of the reasons that pilot didn't get picked up was because Vicki L was associated more with being Thelma Harper and playing older then she was playing her own age.  It was a blessing it didn't get picked up, or we would have been deprived of the syndicated era of Mama's Family.   Also, worth noting a Pre Night Court Marsha Warfield and pre Perfect Strangers Rebecca Arthur in the cast.  All talented women, but stuck with a bad script. And the other pilot had a pre Fran Fine.. Fran Drescher as the best friend.  I think that pilot might have been picked up if Karen Valentine and Fran Drescher switched roles.
    • So, on rewatch....did Rick and Mindy never have sex? 
    • Cady had a fairly posh accent or manner as Rosanna - the character was a 180 from Dixie when she went to ATWT, and it was a huge success initially. As someone mostly only familiar with the nagging, miserable or clueless Dixie of the mid-late '90s and early 2000s it was what convinced me Cady could act. I thought she was incredible in her first run. Later, in future stints, her hair and story and performances were all over the place but a lot of that was down to the show for me. She brought some of Rosanna back with her to Dixie in her ill-fated return and a lot of people didn't like it, which I understood but I did think the character needed some change. I think she's had a little bit of the same persona and arch performance in every role she's played since, including Jennifer Horton at DAYS or Kelly at Y&R, who later became a maniac and was easily the worst work I've ever seen Cady do. It has kind of infected her overall mannerisms, I'll allow that, but I do think she brought Dixie back together as herself while still evolving the character when she returned to AMC again in 2012-13. Nonetheless, for me the upshot is that this is a character where Cady's kookier recent performance style suits the role. But I can understand it grating for people.
    • Yeah, Loretta Swit's passing stings. My late dad LOVED the show (he died last November) and watched it religiously. In first run and repeats.  And I was literally born the day after the show's premiere, so I grew up with it! I know many loved later, softer Margaret, but I loved Early Hot Lips. In real life, I'm all for less misogyny, but to me, the early years of M*A*S*H were just funnier. May Loretta Swit rest in peace. Thanks for all the memories connected to my dad!
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 10/29/73-11/2/73 & 11/5/73-11/9/73:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree that she isn't Dixie or Rosanna and shouldn't be acting like either. I just found it strange that she had a naive Southern character and a wealthy urbane character in the past and didn't experiment with accents before (unless I missed it, correct me if I'm wrong). She used to do improv characters on YouTube. She's probably doing something similar here.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy