Jump to content

Best Soap Opera Opening


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

I interpreted the font change as their attempt at being more traditional, or conservative.

 

But, you're right, it IS ugly (and, if I might add, amateurish-looking, too).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 207
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

 

Like the Melrose Place, Savannah, Pacific Palisades variety. The quintessential Aaron Spelling 90s primetime soap. 

 

 

I think you're right that it's an attempt to be more traditional, but ugly it is and, indeed, amateurish. It looks like a PowerPoint slide.

 

 

Certainly - but if Welch wanted that billing then she should have actually gotten the "And" billing...which means she should have been last. Just a bizarre choice on the producer's part. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

This is 22 years ago and back then there was still the movie vs television dynamic so that if a movie star (like Welch had been) went to work in television, it was a “big deal” of sorts. Welch’s movie career hadn’t really existed since the early 1980s when she sued (and won) a lawsuit against one of the studios for firing her and replacing her with Debra Winger...but it was still a novelty in the 1990s. Plus, CPW was trying to capture the Krystle vs Alexis dynamic between her and Lauren Hutton. 

 

It all failed and we are left with only the opening credits to remember it by. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Heather Locklear wasn’t that big a draw by the time she landed on Melrose Place either.  Dallas was cancelled and she was mostly in TV Films.  But she got her special guest star credit and really ended up adding a lot to the show.

 

All his 90’s shows had promise, but they didn’t get there like Melros or 90210. There is a reason why those shows really took off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 Actually, Luke Perry was enormously popular on that show, and 90210 definitely benefited from his returning, particularly with Jason Priestley gone. He did get a "Special Guest Star: Luke Perry as Dylan" credit when he came back, but for a star/character of his importance and popularity in the 90210 universe, that is not surprising. I'm sure TPTB wanted to cash in on his presence to help the sagging series.

 

He has always been a working actor, steadily employed and doing many different things, including during his break from playing Dylan. What makes you think he needed cash and had his tail between his legs for finally accepting Aaron Spelling's persistent offer to return? I'm curious. Spelling reportedly paid Perry big buck$ to reprise the role. I wouldn't say no either!

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

By the time he came back Dylan's story was pretty lame, but I seriously hate Kelly/Dylan together.  I don't remember him doing much of anything besides doing heroin, dating Gina, and trying to get Kelly back.  Although him almost killing Donna being high on heroin and knocking her in the pool is pretty funny.

There was an interview that I might have read in the 90210 thread on this board with a writer or producer that said Luke came back for the cash.  Reluctantly, after most the og cast/crew was gone.  I will try to find it.  I mean, I am not sure how Luke Perry ranks higher than Jennie Garth who was on the show the entire 10 year run and the show was basically all about her towards the end.  I mean most people do their jobs for money so no harm there, but he didn't warrant special billing, imo.  He just re-joined a dying show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I agree that the writing for Dylan was weak upon Perry's return. When an enormously popular star returns to his former show and the writing is subpar, it is so disappointing. Such a waste. I wouldn't say Perry was considered higher ranked than Garth, who was listed first in the credits, and deservedly so. I think TPTB gave him the special credit and the end just to make him stand out and capitalize on his presence, since by then, the show needed all the help it could get, with Vincent Young and Daniel Cosgrove being such bland leading men, and with Priestly gone.

 

I hope that writer or producer wasn't criticizing Perry doing the job for money, unless he, himself, worked on 90210 for free, LOL! Throughout my life, I have done the jobs I love for cash, and the jobs I did not love for cash. It's all about the money...for everyone.

Please register in order to view this content

 

I'd love to know what they paid Perry to come back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

https://teendramawhore.com/2010/01/17/beverly-hills-90210-producer-talks-college-years-slams-new-90210/

I found the interview I was looking for...has a lot of juicy stuff about 90210 behind the scenes.

 

This is the relevant Luke stuff if you don't want to read the lengthy interview:

 

 

TDW: Well, let’s now go to Luke, because he left in season 6.

Mollin: Luke, he was tired of it. All the kids hated the show by season 5, other than Tori. They all just hated it. Every day they would come in was just torture for them. We were making them do things, making them play these characters. Luke is a wonderful man and a good professional but he just wanted to go. We tried to really stack it up, and thank god we cast Rebecca Gayheart [Toni], who was just such a dear and so wonderful in that part.

TDW: I have a question about that storyline. Chuck told me they had purposefully filmed Jack’s death in season 3 [Episode 3.21, Dead End] in such a way that it could turn out he was really alive. In season 10 we saw that happen [Episodes 10.18-20] but I’ve heard that it was supposed to happen in season 6 until Luke revealed he was leaving. So instead in season 6 we find out that there’s this guy Tony Marchette [Stanley Kamel] behind Jack’s death and Dylan sets off seeking vengeance.

Mollin: I don’t remember the exact sequence of it. Josh Taylor [Jack] never came back when I was there but there was talk of that. Chuck had that FBI agent [Christine Pettit, played by Valerie Wildman] who he always liked. She was a friend of his and he liked to try and throw her work. So we always teased with that. We talked about that but we didn’t really know where to go with it at that point and Chuck was gone at that point. So once Luke was leaving, we wanted to have a big story and there’s nothing bigger than avenging the death of your father and we kind of went that way. That was a very good storyline in the sense that it was a good way to get to Dylan to leave [Episode 6.10, One Wedding And A Funeral]. It was really powerful. It was huge ratings for us. It might’ve been the biggest rating for a non-season finale show. It was big and we did it right. Everything went pretty well with that one.

TDW: It was a phenomenal storyline and it still stands out today to fans as one of the saddest ones.

Mollin: Yeah, it was great. The leading up to it was good. I was able to bring in a lot of my cop show background. We had a lot of tense stuff, stuff we had never done before so that was fun. And we had good actors. That gentleman who played Tony just died recently.

TDW: Yes. He died in 2008.

Mollin: He was excellent in that. But, yeah, that was fun. Luke left and we knew we were certainly going to miss him. We were floundering for guys after that a little bit and went through a bunch of different ones but I guess he came back [in Episode 9.08, You Say Goodbye, I Say Hello] and needed the money or whatever. He would’ve been too embarrassed to come back when I was there or any of the regular [writer-producers] from his time because we knew him so well and we’d know why he was coming back. He was just too proud a guy to come back when Chuck or me or the Wassermans were there. He wouldn’t have done it.

 

 

 

Edited by carolineg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Agreed with both assessments. I actually like the first. Built up sexual tension that's so mid-90's at height of Melrose mania

Please register in order to view this content

 

Yeah, it would've made more sense to drop the "Starring in alphabetical order" indication at the beginning and listed Heather at the end as "and Heather Locklear as Amanda."  There were no egos that would've been salty over it.  But in the end, it's a funny little note in the history of primetime sudsers. 

 

P.S. Models Inc gave the same credit for Emma Samms, as their cast was listed alphabetically, too. ALTHOUGH, Linda Gray was given top billing at the beginning. 

 

With Emma Samms included:

Please register in order to view this content

 

 

The original:

 

Edited by Gray Bunny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I found it to be a rather odd way to deal with a character departing for parts unknown.
    • Today reminded me as to why I’m a little disappointed in the name that the new Pope chose

      Please register in order to view this content

      Luckily, EJ and Johnny, and pretty much every other character saved today’s episode.  I didn’t expect Javi to be the one to save Sarah though, and I don’t mind it at all, because if it means that Javi is finally going to get his own identity/character, away from his douchy bf, I’m all for it. Javi’s scenes would’ve been a lot better had it not been for him. EJ and Johnny were the best part of today. Their conversation hit a lot of important beats and I’m so looking forward to seeing them play out. And now that EJ knows that Johnny is going to work for Xander, that opens up another dynamic to their storyline and to the Kiriakis family storylines as well. Tying them all together could be really good. There are so many story possibilities that can come out of this. And I thought Carson Boatman did a pretty good job again too.  I also liked that Johnny was there to comfort Chanel after everything that happened with Sarah. They’re so good together. But I do have mixed feelings about Chanel possibly forgiving Johnny so quickly. Hopefully, the question that she asked him at the end of today leads to more conflict for the two of them.  And yeah, still no changes in Alex’s character lol 
    • Awesome, thanks so much for taking the time to grab the episode. I had a quick review of your rip because I was curious why it was 700MB and 30 minutes. The first 10 minutes of the episode is 3169 (opening credits at 5 minutes and again at 15 minutes). The full HD version of ep.3170 is on YouTube channel: 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I guess, according to Mike Manning in the Michael Fairman chat, he was almost Derek 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • OIC Thanks. I saw thzt & looked for a prior  ... never mind. 
    • I imagine Brad will blow through all the money in a year and come crawling back, just as Portia warned him not to.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • That's a name I haven't heard in a minute. Thanks! 
    • Well, since I'm still up unexpected past my growing-into-it bedtime. lol.   I finally got to rewatch Monday's. I even rewatched Friday's to take it all in. Now that we got the reveal and hit the climax of the SilkPress Sheila storyline, now we get to watch the aftermath and/or turns that come with its climax. So far, so good. Friday left us with three cliffhangers. And what I found surprising was how I felt about them over a rewatch.    I know some of you all felt a way about the dialogue during Kat vs Eva. I remember liking it more the first time around and it was nice for them to have these scenes to establish more of a frenemy vibe for them going forward. That still held up. But I found myself agreeing with you all about that dialogue. lol. Still, it was nice to have both of their POVs.   Second up was Silk Press Sheila vs the Duprees. And I was happy to get a brief spat with Dani in there. But the rest standouts for me was Anita and Martin. Haters can hate and given the tail end of the episode, I will agree to a fault, but Brandon has impressed and he was on fire on Monday and had great subtle work on Friday. And that subtle work made it all the better. Like I believe I said when I was watching...BC has a much better grip on his character and seems to be realizing what his tics are so has started to be able to know when to turn it up and when to dial it down. And for the most part (emphasis on most), he got that. Meanwhile, TT was giving fierceness, and I was here for every minute of it. Her reading SilkPress. Her being quip about it. Her 'BE STILL.' Ooooo she had a chokehold on me as Anita gave what I was expecting her to SilkPress. WORTH THE WAIT. I also loved Vernon's CHOOSE SILENCE. I wonder though if SilkPress will figure out Martin's condition from her observing Anita and Vernon with him.   And speaking of worth it...Oooo YES Nicole vs Ted was worth totally worth it. Oooooo I knew DD would nail it, and it was all so well done. The fight between the part of Nicole who is a therapist vs Nicole as a woman who wants to express how she feels. And being so angry. And how there would be moments when it would shoot out of her. And how she would restrain herself. But how she felt she should not be restrain. Just the levels of processing and layers. And DD played it all so well. I do wish Maurice gave just a little bit more, but overall, I thought he did a good job even if it was just Ted coming across as a deadbeat and not at all redeemable. And Kat being there for her mother was so beautiful.   Minority, but I love the montage though yes, it did run a little long. Given how the Duprees like to bond (and also as I mentioned from my own very recent family experiences), it did not seem out of place to me.     That said...let's see how the aftermath worked in today's episode. Overall. Cuz RC can be hit or miss. 
    • I wonder whose brilliant (

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) idea it was to do an almost complete rip-off of the "who killed Tom King"-storyline. That's some quality style writing right there.....  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy