Jump to content

Dallas Discussion Thread


John

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I’m rewatching the season where Bel Geddes comes back (the dream season). She’s pretty much the only redeeming thing about that season. Almost everything else falls flat, but she lends the proceedings that air of authenticity that you mention.

Barbara Curran’s book says she wanted an increase in salary and more time off, IIRC. The studio should have found a way to compromise because having Donna Reed in there damaged the show. Could you imagine her being married to Jim Davis’ Jock?

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I remember you once said you liked the modern-day western era more than the corporate and glamorous era.

Even though Dallas was a family/business conflict-based show, it had the heart and roots of a western.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree.

From the start, David Jacobs envisioned DALLAS as a modern-day "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof," with Bobby as Brick, J.R. as Gooper, Pam as Maggie, Sue Ellen as Mae, and Jock and Miss Ellie as Big Daddy and Big Mama.  You also saw a little bit of George Stevens' "Giant" in the Jock/Digger/Miss Ellie triangle, and especially in how Jock and Digger's falling out over business AND Miss Ellie turned Digger into a bitter drunk; and even some of "Romeo & Juliet," too, with Bobby and Pam becoming husband and wife, despite the decades of bad blood between their families.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd assume it might be a bit of both - Linda might not per se have been pushed out, but been asked to do less episode / take less pay and she just decided that it was time to walk away and do other things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In his recent interview Steve Kanaly said Linda was fired/let go. He was also fired along with Priscilla in 1988 and felt betrayed by the show. He was offered the following seasons the four episode appearance Barbara and Howard was offered the final season of the show.

He said they were hiring much younger and cheaper actors because the show was costing too much to produce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The reality was that Larry Hagman and Patrick Duffy (upon his return) sucked up a lot of the budget for actors in the later years as the ratings were on the downswing. Duffy’s salary was doubled when he returned (plus a 1 million dollar signing bonus). During that season, almost all of the recurring (“Also Starring”) cast was released from the show by midseason. By the latter half of that season, the show seemed strangely depopulated. Victoria Principal was willing to stick around for another season after that in exchange for salary parity with Duffy (which she deserve) but Lorimar chose not to meet her demands and she walked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that was intentional.  Pam was pregnant in that episode, just as Maggie claimed she was pregnant.  ("I've got life in me, Big Daddy!")

It's funny how David Jacobs is clearly playing homage to Tennessee Williams' play, and look who they have essentially playing Big Mama?  The original "Maggie the Cat," lol.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Technically, it's really not the same role. 

The role Elizabeth Taylor played in the film was sort of a soft, seductive, benign version of Maggie Pollitt, who would appease the motion picture censors of the 1950s.

In the real play, starring Barbara Bel Geddes, Maggie Pollitt is a scrappy, shrill, relentless fighter (like Pamela Barnes often comes across in the early episodes of "Dallas") who's given the thankless and insurmountable task of dealing with a mean brother-in-law, a jealous and self-righteous sister-in-law, and an alcoholic young husband who'd rather pine away for his lost love (Skipper) than lay a hand on his wife.   (It appears Brick and Skipper had a sexual relationship, Maggie suspected it, she attempted to seduce Skipper to be sure, and when Skipper couldn't perform he killed himself.)  But in the end, Maggie triumphs -- or at least, she seems POISED to triumph -- when she hides her husband's liquor and lets him know he won't be getting another drop of booze until he's fertilized her egg so she can produce an heir for Big Daddy.

And that's definitely not the role Elizabeth Taylor played in the movie, lol.  (Barbara Bel Geddes and Ben Gazzara got very good reviews for the roles of Maggie & Brick on Broadway.)    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

So I'm about 3 episodes into Knots maestro Peter Dunne's infamous dream season and I have a lot of thoughts - most of them positive to Dallas for a change. I know it will go off the rails, but I've been pleasantly surprised. Watch this space, I guess?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If they got rid of the stunt casting and focused on the Pam vs. JR dynamic after the loss of Bobby, that could've been great.  One hopes that they didn't pin the drop in ratings on Victoria Principal and instead put the blame on Barbara Carrera and all the surrounding silliness. 

JR trying to exert control over Pam, interfering with Christopher, and trying to get rid of Mark was fun.  And as, explained in this thread, that dynamic was part of the source material.  But, even better in season 9, because by then Pam had experience and her own base of power, so she was an equal rival.  Yet, once they felt the need to expand beyond Dallas into international intrigue, it became a flop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'll talk about this more when I go into the episodes in detail, but I was surprised to see Leonard Katzman's name on the writing credits of the (excellent) season premiere and to learn he apparently stayed involved in some creative capacity during the dream season. There's a claim he came up with the notorious Angelica Nero, but I don't know how that's true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Just beautifully done. I could name some minor quibbles, but I won't, because what DAYS gave us today was golden. That was soap opera at its finest, paying homage to history and legacy and actors and the audience. This is why we love soaps.
    • To clarify, we could argue about the necessity to have John Black speak while in hospital, but the body created an opportunity for people to touch him, and move around him.  Even though I never totally suspended my disbelief, I appreciated their creative choice to form a visual representation of loss.  Certainly there were other ways to tell this story, but it will stay with me because those production choices enabled these performances. However, with disdain, I note that Days has found an odd middle ground between a flashback and a montage.  I define a flashback as least a couple of rounds of dialogue, if not a whole scene.  And a montage would be a visual snippet without much dialogue.  But, these were often just a single line, or an entrance.  It felt like a bit of a tease, and made me wish that Peacock had curated a playlist of John Black's Greatest Hits, like they do for some Bravo shows or SNL characters.  OT - but they have yet to maximize that platform.
    • It's tough for me because I feel like this has always been Lulu. She used to be even worse, slut-shaming, verbally abusing other women, and always being written as being in the right. They should let Brook Lynn get dirtier, but I think the material of Lulu digging and being self-righteous, making everything worse even while not intending to do so, but also not being as in the wrong as Dante thinks she is, all makes sense for her. But I don't have as much experience with Lulu as a lot of fans as I just could never stomach her beyond the time she was a mute kid, so I don't have much right to speak.
    • Thanks @JAS0N47 for all the ratings!   All My Children hits Number 1 in the ratings for the first time in its history during the week of 8/20/73-8/20/73!
    • I think the writing is slanted against Lulu.  I don't think there is an issue with the character in general.  I just think Lulu comes doesn't get many layers or nuance in her writing.  Lulu becomes obnoxious and a bully to Brook Lynn and both characters SHOULD have flaws.
    • Totally here for Anita dumping Sharon in the past for first Dante Green, and then Vernon...
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Hey Anita and Sharon

      Please register in order to view this content

        
    • Amanda Setton and Rena Sofer was once again really good in today's episode.  As a Lucky/Liz fan, I didn't like their scenes either.  And they are nowhere near a proposal because they haven't been given a real story.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy