Jump to content

Paula Deen


Eric83

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 253
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I remember when she did a special on her wedding to her current husband, and there was a scene where she and him were on his boat.. and attached to the boat was a confederate flag.. and I remember thinking that they were probably racist. Without any proof, I filed this scene in my mind.. but now with everything coming out, I remember this scene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What some people are missing (deliberately, I suspect) is that Deen's use of the N-word was brought up in a lawsuit brought by the former African American manager to show a recent long existing pattern of discrimination and racially hostile environment of her and her brother's restaurant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I read the entire deposition and retract EVERYTHING I SAID

The Breathtaking Collapse of Paula Deen: Lessons Learned

Last Wednesday the media released a transcript of a deposition by celebrity chef Paula Deen in which she acknowledged, using the N-word, thinking about throwing a plantation-themed wedding and finds racist, anti-Semitic and jokes about other groups amusing. She went on to say: “I can’t, myself, determine what offends another person.”

I think it’s safe to say that she now has a much clearer idea of what offends another person.

In just under 60 hours her racist rant went viral, her ill-conceived apologies collapsed like a bad soufflé and the Food Network said in a terse statement that it would not be renewing her contract when it ends next month. While the Food Network is not the most lucrative part of her reported $17 million dollar a year empire, it was certainly the engine that fueled the visibility for her wide-ranging associations, which include restaurants, cookbooks, food products, furniture, mattresses, hams, personal appearances and numerous other moneymakers.

When I first saw Deen’s deposition I predicted the collapse of her empire. Few things are more abhorrent to us than racism, or even perceived racism. Hers was not one word used in a heated moment; it was a shockingly insensitive acknowledgment of her innermost thinking and beliefs.

So what do we need to learn from this demise and what are our take-aways?

1) The first mistake Deen, and any business owner can make, is by allowing a business environment to have racist undertones and language and reportedly viewing of pornography in the workplace by employees. We all owe our employees an environment free of these kinds of pressures that clearly create an uncomfortable work environment.

2) Once Deen was sued, decisions need be made on what’s best for the business. I do what is referred to as “litigation-support” public relations. That is when there is a legal component to my representation including, but not limited to, lawsuits, divorces and other legal actions. I always explain to my clients that they have to deal with the court of law and the court of public opinion. You can win in one and lose in the other. In Deen’s case she may indeed prevail in the court of law, but she has already lost, big-time, in the court of public opinion.

3) I’ve seen it again and again; smart business people who are sued and refuse to settle because the lawsuit has no validity. Get over it. Maybe it does or maybe it doesn’t have validity. That’s not what you need to determine.

4) It’s a business decision. How much will it cost to settle? How much time and investment in attorneys will it take to fight it? What will be the impact on the business, vendors, customers and employees? And perhaps most importantly, can my business afford to fight this in public?

5) Privacy was something we had in the last millennium. We don’t have it now. Safe for a very few exceptions when minor children are involved in divorces, lawsuits are public documents. All filings, depositions and motions will and are public. Can your business survive this? Paula Deen’s couldn’t.

6) The next huge mistake was in Ms. Deen’s seeming lack of preparation for her deposition. She didn’t just say she used the N-word. When asked if she had ever used it, she said, “Yes, of course.” Cringe. Really? “Of course?” I learned early on from some very wise mentors that there are three acceptable answers in a deposition: Yes, no and I don’t recall. Her embellishment was her indictment.

7) Once the deposition leaked out, Ms. Deen’s lawyer came out with a statement to the effect that she would have her day in court. It was shockingly insensitive for a public figure. Insensitive to the fact that while waiting to go to trial, which can take months or years, she was bleeding to death in the court of public opinion. And knowing what was in the deposition, court would/will get massive media attention and she will go through N-word hell again.

8) The next day Ms. Deen personally agreed to talk to Matt Lauer of The Today Show. On Thursday The Today Show heavily promoted her personal appearance. There’s nothing wrong with doing a big interview with a major media outlet. But what she did do wrong was try to rush. This case, by virtue of a court date, had a long shelf life. Ms. Deen had a longer time to prepare for an interview and needed to know that. A few days, some intense preparation and coordination between her legal and PR teams would have been the best road.

9) Friday morning her team cancelled the interview and left The Today Show in an awkward situation. If they were indeed once her allies, she lost that. Worse, she made news in a bad way and dug a deeper hole even deeper.

10) To combat this she then put an ill-conceived video on Youtube.com in what served as her apology. It was trying to be slick, but was in fact odd, overly edited, poorly written and wreaked of inauthenticity. The response was instant and devastating. No one could imagine that such a video could have been made public.

11) That video was pulled and then she did a second video apology, this time to to Matt Lauer, saying she was exhausted.

12) Finally, she did a third video with a different apology to the public and by then it was clearly too little, too late.

13) Concurrently, The Food Network tersely announced that it would not be renewing her contract next month.

Understand, one well-conceived apology is fine. Again, don’t rush. Get it right the first time. Her ham-handed (pun intended) series of apologies served to make the story the lead item in the news that day and throughout the weekend. Strategically, you want the story to go away.

Saturday morning it was leaked that the reason The Food Network let her go was because of her handling of the situation. There are two parts to every situation: what happens and how you handle it. Clearly they had no confidence that Paula and her team could resurrect their image and they had no intention of going down with the ship.

Lesson? Hire a professional. Don’t do this alone. It’s like going to a country doctor for cancer or a heart attack. Bring in the best talent you can—this is an existential situation.

Paula Deen’s brand is not dead. She will salvage some relationships; she will mobilize some of her hard-core fans; and my guess is that her telegenic sons will take a bigger role as the brand transitions from Paula Deen to The Deen Family.

But to be clear, she will Never come back whole. She will never make as much money as she did. And this moment will be with her until the day she dies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Enjoy Errol!  Your guy! Teehee @Errol  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I just had thought of how to save the Perkins family. (Inspired by Rituals) -- What if Marisa Perkins was Augusta Lockridge's sister? Fictionally, they could've both been local girls, one married rich and one married poor. Originally, I was going to suggest that Marisa be Sophia's sister, but then I realized Joe and Kelly would've been first cousins.  Of course, it would've truly inspired Sophia was if Rosa Andrade sister, with Rosa and Santana moving in to help CC raise the kids once Sophia disappeared.  While this could've avoided both gross CC and Santana affairs, the times were not right for a story about intersectional inequity.
    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJxW5DLJLId/ Another World is my forever favorite soap opera. But it's finale is almost universally hated by its fans. What this is, is an edit where I've deleted everything I didn't like!!!
    • The Perkins family had potential to be a nice alternative to the more dysfunctional Capwells and wackier Lockridges... but I think a few factors did in the family. 1) Recasting of Joe Perkins 2) Bad casting of the Perkins Patriarch, and the one note writing for that character. 3) Lack of antagonistic interaction between the Capwells/Lockridges and Perkins.  (There was no awkwardness between Jade/Ted.. or CC disapproving of his son being friends with that Perkins girl, etc). 4) Wasting of Jade thus wasting the potential of the actress (which was realized on Days of Our Lives).  She had more potential than Laken oddly enough. The only member of the Perkins family that had appeal and a somewhat thought out story arc was Amy.  
    • @GymnastGuyThanks for posting the three new Capitol 1985 episodes today. The two labeled March 12, and 13 are misidentified. The March 12 labeled one actually aired November 12 1985 which I figured out because Kenny Rogers' movie Wild Horses aired November 12th and it was announced over the "March 12" Cap credits. In addition, Craig Carlson is listed in the April credits but not the March. Craig left Capitol sometime after July 1985 before he rejoined OLTL in the credits by October 15, 1985; he was replaced on Cap by Radcliffe and Hamner. In these posted episodes Radcliffe/Hamner names appear in the March 85 episodes but not in the April.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • 5-15   And now...back to the A plot. I can't say enough about how great this week has been that I've been enjoying the fallout from the SilkPress/Eva reveal. I can't believe that it's been almost a week, and it is STILL going on. And they are playing every beat. And rightfully so. It's a strength to the story that this episode is full of mostly those beats with one (okay 2) C plots. I loved how this episode seem centered on dealing with the Bill of it all from his reactions to the reactions of the ones who actually care about him. And meanwhile, Kat getting a clue and connecting it back to the plot thread of Laura's accident.    Game recognizes game. My way of saying I loved Bill vs Silk Press Sheila. They have great adversarial chemistry. And I loved that Bill not only gave the heads-up to NuTed, but already figured out that Ted had paid her off. A dumbed-down villain Bill definitely is not. And awww at Naomi walking in on him and NuTed. lol. Like father, like daughter cuz they both stay reading people. Also loved the scene of Naomi and Chels together discussing their feelings about their father in light of the reveal.    It's so sad to see Kat thinking in the right direction and STILL took a wrong turn. That said...great to see the Laura plot thread picked up and Kat moving to get to the bottom of it. It's just sad that her strong disdain toward Eva is blinding her to the real threat. Makes her easy prey for SilkPress to manipulate and harder for Eva to get acceptance if people still think she's up to no good. Also intensifies their rivalry. Kat vs Silk Press Sheila was reaaallly good, too. The direction. The camera angles. The lines. Even got background music.

      Please register in order to view this content

      And...HAHAHA I love how SilkPress Sheila reacts to the word 'crazy' the same way Sheila herself reacts to the word 'bitca' right before one of her catfights on B&B. Honorable mention to another SilkPress vs Eva scene where Eva avoids the gaslight and that Andre/Eva scene where he continues to be there for her.    And speaking of the reveal...now that I've seen the full episode...I've warmed to NuTed a bit. I thought in the brief scene I saw on my busy Thursday that he did what I love when a role gets recast. The actor uses some of the mannerisms of their predecessers, but not do a complete parroting of them. And that I felt he pulled off well. It allows for the actor to slowly enter their own vibe to a role and make it their own. And so far...I felt Keith was still...Ted. Love the scenes with NuTed/Kat. But time will tell if I feel he will make it his own.   The only good thing I can say about that Andre/Ashley scene...they both have gotten comfortable in their roles, and it was nice to see. I'm Team Dani/Andre over here. That said...I actually am loving the C plot of Ashley, Derek, and the apartment because they are finally getting drama. And I'm actually Team Derek though I completely understand where Ashley is coming from. Thankful that we got that phone call with her mother for her POV and background life. She really is not used to living with someone and what that is like. And it's relatable. But she's handling it all the wrong way. As for their overall place on the canvas though, I can't help, but think about what I said in the first week...they are just meta to me...getting the development...or lack thereof...that black characters get on other soaps...just in reverse.    Awww at June saying that she just finds the picture lovely. I don't completely believe her hehe, but it was nice.    The anvils about Eva's birthday...smh. lol. 
    • I think we have learned by now that you can never be sure anyone's actually dead on a soap...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy