Jump to content

AMC: The Prospect Park Era (old production thread)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

While I would love for AMC and OLTL to come back, I'm not exactly sure how I feel about ABC getting their hands back on them. They ran these shows into the ground (especially AMC) and then cancelled them.

Plus, if ABC wants to do this, they would have to cancel either The View or The Chew (GH is not an option -- could you believe what would happen if ABC cancelled GH for AMC/OLTL?). The Chew is doing well, so I don't see that going away, but The View is going downhill and with Queen Barbara leaving this year........

  • Members
Posted

I understand were you are coming from. If ABC produces them there will be no way in heck that people like Brooke/Dimitri/Billy Clyde will be on the show let alone the actors being asked back. I would fear that Ginger Smith/Jennifer Peppermen wouldn't be asked back either let alone Agnes working on the show again and I would expect Ronald and Franklin being in charge of production. I just hope if ABC gets the shows back they will prove me wrong otherwise I may have to watch with caution.

As I have said many times I started when Jesse/Angie reunited then I devoted all my free time from the point I watched that episode to the Tornadoes on learning about the show. I also assumed that the show was plot driven/doom and gloom because of the aftermath NOT because of the the writer. I had no idea how unbalanced the show until the aftermath was over. By then I was hooked though mainly because of Erica/Tad/Adam/Opal/Jesse/Angie. I loved the actors and I hoped that someday I would watch the AMC that mother and father watched and when it finally happened this past year I felt spoiled!! So I would be more than disappointed if the shows went back to how they were when they left.

  • Members
Posted

Well yes, it's about wanting the show the way I like it. Am I supposed to watch a show I don't like out of some demented form of loyalty? A loyalty that ABC never appreciated and actively punished me for, BTW. Well then I guess I should just start watching GH since apparently it's wrong of me to want to enjoy the show I watch. Even before cancellation I'd given up AMC. I only came back for the birth of the Hubbard baby and I would've checked out again if the hammer hadn't come down.

I'm going to go back to a line I haven't had to use in a while. It not my job to support the shows, it's their job to make me want to. I'm not a partner, I'm the customer and if you don't give me a product I want, I'm not going to buy it. I didn't watch AMC 2.0 out of loyalty or obligation, I watched it because I loved the product. ABC already proved that they cannot or will not provide me with soap that I want to see.

I wouldn't watch ABC again for the same reason I don't watch Tyler Perry movies: because I know what to expect and I'm not interested. My desire to support black actors and filmmakers doesn't mean that I will subject myself to his IMO inferior product. As for the soaps, that doesn't mean that I would actively root for them to fail but I won't waste my time watching. Just like I don't watch any of the network soaps now.
  • Members
Posted

I would love for it to be on abc for two reasons frons is no longer there. Vicki Drummer is much smarter and is letting Ron and frank do what they want with GH. It will never happen. PP will never revive these they have no cash they are the biggest joke I have seen in history.

  • Members
Posted

I am the last person here who would ever want to give people here false hope. But unlike the near zero chance that a PP online venture had at succeeding, there may be a slim (roughly 15%) chance that AMC/OLTL could succeed if they came back to ABC (each as 30 minute soaps filmed at Stamford). A huge reason why the internet venture was doomed from the start was because the older audience was not accustomed to watching shows that way, and because of inadequate promotion. These problems would be eliminated via an ABC Daytime airing, but one huge problem still remains, and that's the fact that it is just so difficult to get casual soap fans (who are viewers of habit) to tune back into shows that have been off of television for several years.

If ABC really wanted to bring these soaps back, they would face two logistical problems: getting the hour back from affiliates (which they gave up for Katie) and getting creative control back from PP. (If I recall correctly, I think the original contract gave PP 10 years of creative control, but there may be certain conditions/stipulations involved. Perhaps ABC can sue PP for breach of contract in order to regain creative control.) I know that a lot of folks here are opposed to ABC regaining control, but I view them as the lesser of two evils as compared to the chronically incompetent and dishonest PP.

I am opposed to trying a Season 2 for the PP online versions of AMC/OLTL, because I have such a strong feeling that it will again end in financial failure, and that PP will play its usual games (e.g., reducing the number of episodes, issuing strange press releases, filing bogus lawsuits). If AMC/OLTL (and their fans) cannot be treated with dignity, then it is better for them to remain dead. However, I am not opposed to trying an attempted ABC-controlled revival of AMC/OLTL that would air on ABC Daytime, even though I think that failure is highly likely. If such a revival succeeds, there will be two more soaps from which to choose (obviously a big plus for the genre). And if it fails, I trust that ABC will give both soaps proper finales, so that fans won't be in this endless state of uncertainty.

  • Members
Posted

ABC doesn't care about using those soaps again. They are only keeping GH for now because nothing else succeeded. At "best," they will allow Ron to spitefully tell stories about Colby being raped and/or murdered.

  • Members
Posted

Max, I disagree. I think Prospect Park's only problem clearly has been funding. They are a small company with less than 5 primetime shows on air. They simply don't have the money to produce these soaps. Their biggest screwups could be overcome if ABC let them produce these shows, since the most important aspect (money) wouldn't be an issue. Creatively they handled it right. They put together talented teams that included some new talent and people who knew the shows. Had these shows continued I know we were in for even better stuff. With ABC their track record speaks for itself.

  • Members
Posted

I feel the same way. I'd really want to give AMC a chance in any form, but I've been burned too many times by ABC hiring back McTavish.

I doubt ABC would put either show back on their network in the daytime. My suspicion is they would go to ABC Family or another cable channel (I'm not sure what ones Disney owns).

I was so excited to have Pine Valley feel like home again on the online version. It would be a shame to see what a train wreck Cartini would make of it.

As someone who grew up watching GH during its 1980s glory days, I was extremely disappointed with how Cartini handled bringing back so many characters for the 50th anniversary. They had no clue how to use the history of the show without resorting to bringing back just about anyone who'd ever died just for shock value.

Speaking of Tyler Perry, I finally saw an ad from a Madea movie that made me laugh; the one where Larry the Redneck Moron (whatever he actually calls himself) asks if she heard a racist joke and she asks if he's heard of the redneck who got shot telling that joke. So Tyler Perry can come up with one good quip in 15 years!tongue.png

  • Members
Posted

ABC wanted them back before PP returned - after GH began improving in the numbers they wanted to be able to at least have the option of doing short-run series with them during the summer months, or something, and this was a plan Frank Valentini supposedly pushed for. This, again allegedly, contributed to their extreme reluctance to cooperate with PP at all. To which I say, nice thought but you shouldn't have cancelled the shows and sold the rights. It galls me when people cite this story as evidence that ABC is totally for the soaps now and that PP "ruined everything." If not for their cancelling the shows and treating them like [!@#$%^&*] for a good 15+ years they wouldn't be in that position. They made their own bed and they have no long-term interest in the soaps. While some executives might or might not, I will never believe the corporate apparatus at large there or in Disney wants that. It's simply not cost-effective for the kind of margins they want.

The only way I'd want them back on ABC is if ABC was utterly hands off creatively and was only distributing them. This was something floated around a while back, but it has yet to happen. As much as I'd like a clean break, the fact is that a network like ABC has the kind of money necessary to make this work where many independent outfits do not. That is a business reality. And when these shows were being, as Chris says, produced out in Stamford at a fraction of the cost of other soaps but still looked and were overall produced as well as B&B if not better, being made for less money than GH and looking a lot more expensive - I think that's a steal. I think it still would be.

PP producing the shows independently and having them run on ABC was a good idea, in my book. At this point, however, I have severe doubts that PP's upper management can ever get its [!@#$%^&*] together for something like that. But if they could, and if ABC could front the money and then get out of the way of the creative process, then I can't see opposing it.

  • Members
Posted

My stomach actually lurched reading that. Ron getting his hands anywhere near AMC has always been my doomsday scenario. RC writing for Colby, Cass, or Miranda…ugh. The rape and pregnancy would never stop and the same people complaining about the trafficking story would chug it down and declare it brilliant.

  • Members
Posted

Miranda being raped would be "soapy goodness" and a brilliant use of history. Miranda revealing that she wanted it would be ironic amazing perfection, compared to Bianca's rape. And when Miranda gets a kooky split personality, Melinda, everyone goes wild at the genius of it all.

Ron taking a big dump on PC characters - casually murdering a popular heroine so that he could tell a month or two of story for her vacuous, frozen-faced twink of a son - is a guide to what he would do if he got his hands on AMC. He secretly hates these shows and resents them for not being his. Or even worse, he "loves" them for reasons that involve very sick, disturbing fetishes, none of which have anything to do with the intent or the heart of said shows.

The only thing worse than Ron hating your show is Ron liking your show.

I wouldn't trust ABC even if Ron and Frank aren't involved. They can't produce anything. They can't schedule anything. They barely manage this with a few primetime shows, let alone daytime.

This would likely be the daytime equivalent of strip mining.

  • Members
Posted

My biggest concern over ABC getting the whole thing back lock, stock and barrel - rights and all - is the idea, however foolish (but I don't think it's that far off from what would be the reality) that if they did mount a short-run revival of the two shows on their own they'd just disseminate the existing GH corps and staff across AMC and OLTL to limit costs. Most likely with Frank running all three. He did come up with this strategy to bring the shows back in future and I'm sure it came from a good place, with true love for the shows in his heart, but I suspect it would've meant he would be the man in charge over all those new mini-shows. And I'm sorry, but I don't think that's a good idea on any level.

I'm sure there are some that would cream their jeans at the thought of Frank and Ron holding sway over every single soap on ABC Daytime at once, but at this point they're barely holding GH together. I have less of a problem with Frank than I do Ron's writing, but he's still got his share of problems in terms of what they prioritize. As I've said a dozen times, the biggest problem is the idea of these shows looking, feeling, being written and produced the same, under the same ethos and mentality. But I think there's come to be outright aggression to the idea that on their own these shows could ever be better than what those guys are doing at 2 PM.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • It feels like the show hired Hank Northrop first and are still deciding what to do with him lol. I don't have a judgement on the character yet, but this non-story (so far) has been happening for at least a month and he's only made 2 appearances lol.
    • I know Anita mentioned that she no longer was investing in the trust, while Leslie had stated that the interest was multiplying at a decent rate... but I do have a feeling she'll wipe through the trust in a short amount of time with the amount of spending she's doing. The show always throws in tiny nuggets of foreshadowing and having Anita's remark and Eva warning her mother not to overdo the spending tells me that Leslie will be blowing through that money eventually.
    • I honestly don't care if Laura is friends with Sonny.  She's been friends with him for decades.  The way she goes about the friendship is stupid.   She has no sense of self-preservation or awareness about the optics of parading her friendship with Sonny around town.  She practically celebrates it.  There's no reason in the world she can't just keep the friendship low key and explain they share a grandchild and frame the relationship that way.  A lot of Laura's choices, like getting into a public fight with Dalton, just make her look silly and like a fairly incompetent mayor. Carly is another PC lady that's starting to look silly.  I know she's explained her plan a lot, but it's still stupid and moving at a glacial pace.  If Joss is 45 by the time her revenge plot unfolds, what's the point?  Just dump Brennen and move on please.
    • On that same note, it's astounding to have mobster Sonny in the same office with Mayor Laura chatting it up about their mutual grandson. Think about the reaction if John Gotti and Mayor Eric Adams had a friendship

      Please register in order to view this content

      ?? I guess the Logic behind Sonny & Jason acceptance is like when i saw a documentary where FBI agents said they'd rather deal with the mafia than terrorists or cartels---they're the "lesser of 3 evils". Anyway I'm about 30 years late on this convo.
    • Im confused. Does Jessica know anything about June's relation to Tyrell? At the start of the episode, it seemed like June was gonna slip that he was her son but she caught herself but later in the episode she referred to him as "my boy" and Jessica had no reaction like that wasnt a surprise to her No, Anita was putting money in the account every 6 months but we werent told how much was in it when Leslie became a beneficiary. The show has set it up that it was multiplying based off the interest so that its really worth quite alot now. I dont buy it but thats what they've told us
    • What was the point in Lori's return as Mrs. Max Hollister? That little story never made much sense to me.  Were there plans for a permanent return? Or even a new family with her as the matriarch?  
    • I guess it depends on your device.  I can watch CW shows via their website on my Windows PC.
    • Ooooo A Liam episode? I'll watch it later today. They sure are churning the daily episodes out early.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy