Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of March


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Robert didn't deal with his grief at all - he just transferred it. Luke is now putting his great friend in a situation where both he and Ethan (Luke's favorite child) could be killed because they are both acting on blind pain and insanity. For all Luke knows, this could end in a murder-suicide. Would Luke even care??

The problem with these stories is what may seem realistic is not good soap viewing. For instance - was it realistic for Luke to not care that he killed "Elizabeth's son that Lucky raised"? Sure. Was it realistic that Lucky dumped his kids without a second thought? Sure. Is it realistic that most of Robin's family has little interest in mourning together? Of course.

Does this make good viewing? I don't think it does. GH was not a show which became popular because of realism or honesty.

I'm not sure killing off a child is the way to do that...

I don't care as much about the funeral as I do that Robert had a whopping one day or less of scenes dealing with this story before he became totally immersed in Ethan's exit. It's just cheap writing and viewers who loved the character and his history with Robin got nothing in return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I don't know how you can say he doesn't care. he just said he thought about killing himself and he thinks about killing Jake every day.

As for realistic? I'm not sure I called anything that is happening on this show that. LOL! I just said Robert trying to avoid his grief is understandable. I've never thought funerals are good soap. I hate them, both in real life and TV, but I think someone feeling they had to go would be the more "realistic" outcome, even if it made them wish they really had jumped after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And I didn't say that. :P Killing Hope was an easy out for RC--it gives him an instant story with Todd going after Sonny (let's face it, Todd would probably have cared, well, not at all if only Cole had died), is "high drama" and solves his seemingly long term dilemna of wanting to write Starr without a child... I was merely refering to shoving all that Blair/Todd backstory into awkward hospital chitchat in one episode.

Funerals haven't made good soap since the days they could afford to use a real church, hire at least some extras to fill the seats, and make a point of having character returns and memories/.flashbacks that honour the character that viewers are sad to see go. I actually feel pretty much the same about soap weddings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Starr could have gone to school in Port Charles sans her daughter, but that would have been too easy. What they did with Robert Scorpio if this is the final episode with Tristan makes me think of the shooting emoticon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think he cares. What he says and what he feels are two very different things. He's a sociopath. That he cannot even acknowledge Jake as a grandchild, even now, says it all.

I guess I don't see this as being about a funeral. I see it as being about a grieving process. There were few, if any, scenes, of Robert having conversations with Robin's loved ones and processing this death. They didn't have to show a funeral. They didn't have to have Robert go to the funeral. All they had to do was have strong, moving scenes with Robert, Anna, Emma, Patrick, Mac, even Holly, maybe. Instead, Robert spends a few days on a bridge and gets the hell out of town.

It's a cheat, and like most RC returns, utterly pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honestly I'm not sure how many soap funerals even had real churches. I think it's more a lack of heart and emotion that hurts - I don't care about extras, they just have to say "we limited this to close friends and family." I wish Ed Coleridge's memorial from RH was on Youtube - it was only a handful of people, in a thrown together funeral home set, and was still harrowing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh the real churches is definitely at the low end of my priorities there... It's down to the writing, and using characters relevent to the dead character (even if they can't bring back too many from the past, to at least aknowledge the dead characters family members and why they aren't there is easy to do...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think all 3 returns were wasted and was just a way to pay lip service to caring oh so much about GH's history while focusing on what FV/RC really care about another Sonny centric drama with his faves from OLTL. I actually understand and get the OLTL characters coming on to generate some interest its a shame its wasted on the same toxic GH characters.

Im bummed we got no flashbacks other than one where Robin meets Robert. None with Anna, Mac or even Patrick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The oddest part for me is they rushed Robin's death yet got nothing out of it. They have avoided any real drama, not played any beats. If I hadn't watched AMC and GH I would think Anna is just this dull woman who doesn't have much to say or do or feel. I would think Robert was a deadbeat. Holly is just bizarre and stupid. Patrick has barely been seen, aside from a few days of howling. Jen Lilley is OK but can't really sell most of Maxie's grief.

I think RC/FV want flash and trash - that's what they sold on OLTL. And it does work to a point. People are talking about a child's death. They're laughing at and being shocked by Comedy Connie. But the show has the emotional weight of Spongebob Squarepants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All I know is that Frank better work on bringing KdP on full-time for the remainder of GH so that I don't have to endure my Todd being saddled in more scenes with that cockroach.

I'm over the moon about Todd being GH's newest character, but not if this is the route that Ron'll be taking him down.

The last thing that I want is for Todd Manning to become another AJ Quartermaine or Jasper Jacks - two decent characters that were steamrolled over for that slore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Johnny (the only newbie character that I actually like) deserves better than to be stuck with Sonny's leftovers. I wonder if backstage politics are to blame for having a character/actor that has tons of charisma and sex appeal wasted with craptacular characters, even though he's shown more promise away from the vortex of suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy