Jump to content

Y&R: Discussion for the month of January


Recommended Posts

  • Members

You'd think if Sharon was going to have the balls to tell Nick, Nikki and Victor to shove it, the scene would have gone on a little longer than it did.

I know technically she's justified, but her arrogance makes her completely unsympathetic in this circumstance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm talking about having a story that doesn't involve Chloe at all. It seems like the only way Heather can be into a guy is if Chloe had him first.

Not to mention her stupidity. It doesn't help that she sometimes looks like she doesn't know where she's at looks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the initial Chloe/Chance/Heather stuff was deliberate but since then I think they've tried to move her away from Chloe. They dropped Chloe/Ronan quickly and haven't gone back. I guess I can see why their fans might be upset, but then, all I remember with Chloe/Ronan was a gawping maw of anti-chemistry, like most of Chloe's romantic pairings.

I just hate what they made Nina's story into, but what can I expect? I guess I should be happy they even bothered to give her a scene.

Everything with Ronan is so boring.

That's the joke of Sharon finding "independence" and so on - this story has nothing to do with her. It's still all about the waving dicks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel bad for the fans who watched back in the 80's and waited for this story to be revisited only to end up with a whimper of a story. It doesn't help that Branson looks like he may bolt at any minute.

My inner 12 year old always laughs at the waving dicks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Branson was poor casting. He is much too low-energy for this type of role, and he just seems lost.

There was no reason for this story. Just as there was no reason to bring back Patty. This weird assault on history is both lazy and counterproductive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree the scene should have been longer but I think she's more defiant, not arrogant. I like her chemistry with Adam but Maria needs to play ALL beats in this storyline instead of white washing everything Adam did to make them more palpable. Where the hell is Ashley in this storyline? If Sharon wants to be with Adam then truly deal with the repercussions instead of everyone telling her she's stupid and none of them can claim any moral high ground. That's the problem. We have Niki casting stones but she also cheated and is involved with greasy Deacon. Nick should be justifiably upset but it's not being shown where he's actually terrified that Adam will be in Faith's life because he's too busy screwing Diane and acting like he's morally superior. Since Adam is shown to be no threat to Faith, his outrage comes off as more like a bruised ego. And of course there's Victor - who's completely unlikeable in this storyline with all his lies and machinations involving Skye's "death".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No man on a Sheffer written project would ever be "terrified" of anything, save their child at death's doorstep. That said, I think it is clear Nick's reaction isn't about a bruised ego, but about how he can't trust Sharon anymore, period. Nor IMO, should he.

I think Sharon's arrogant. She's running around town telling everyone to bugger off, lecturing them (even Ash) that they're "no better" than Adam. Arrogant, delusional, and just plain CRAZY sums it up to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That is a funny scene and then he just comes into the restaurant cold and calculating to look at him

in the pink bathrobe you'd never guess he's so cunning great acting by Tristan.

I think this is interesting as for Kevin/Chloe/Jana but Chloe acts like a teen sometimes for me

she's acting rather immature in this particular storyline. I liked how Abby told Daniel to get

his itsky together and took a hike until he did but here is Chloe throwing popcorn in a theatre

it just seemed silly to me for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well put, Carl!

Thing is the Patty story had potential thanks to casting and finally giving Doug Davidson some storyline again. That Ronan story just sucks; they took great characters like Nina/Cricket came up with a lame-o story, ruined one of Y&R greatest stories from the 80s and what we got out of it is Ronan & Eden Beagle!? Sorry this just is : :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This!

Lately, more times than not, I feel that the non writers are channeling the late Reilly from beyond. Nothing makes sense, so we have to sit back why the characters try and tell us why it does. This show reeks, and Sharon can't be more arrogant if she tried. She needs to move her high and mighty slutty ass off that ranch!

ANDREA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought the Patty story started off good enough but got ruined bc the show didnt know how to friggin end it. It just got ridiculous and they kept trying to come up with excuses to keep her around even if doing so meant ruining other characters in the process

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only thing good about this Ronan storyline was that scene the other day. When Nina was in his room.

I can't remember the words, but it was her speech saying something like "I can't save you! I can't! But don't give up, let me be here for you1" Obviously, it was MUCH better than that...But Tricia just puts SO much into her scenes, no matter the crappy the writing is...And her emotion actually moved me to tears.

EDIT: Okay, I found the scene.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tn881G76L44

The scene starts at 3:30, but it gets really emotional at 5:15.....ONLY Tricia Cast could save this storyline. She is just so...real. She's just outstanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Kin was definitely unhappy that he was not used effectively on Texas. I actually liked Jeb’s introduction and was looking forward to a Jeb / Courtney romance. Unfortunately he never got a well written front burner story and was gone in a year.  
    • WE SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURE DID!!!
    • Thank goodness, MM arrived! It's also a reminder of how much the show misses her energy. We all suspected she was connected to Dumas and that actually works. And that Power Pink Pant Suit. Fire. They dropped enough clues for us to figure out who AD is. From the timeline, to deep Winters background, admiring Neil and getting CI from Victor. Oh, Sharon are you really going to be the first to break the pact? Those scenes were horribly written. Sharon isn't petty like that - Faith/Christian on a private jet. Sharon isn't superficial. What should've happened is that Sharon noticing that Phyllis is crumbling to her trauma. Sharon doesn't have to a savior, but Sharon would definitely provide supportive advice.      
    • Alan not reading the book was probably wise because he didn't interrupt as much and the five guests (Caryn and Tom especially) were all talking to one another with little to no input from Alan.  I think Caryn was pretty honest about the common bond of being young, new to soaps, and venting about the confusing structure of their stories that bonded them together.  And she was right that the stories changed left and right... her character alone had several stories/love interests during that two year period. Kin was also a bit bitter and I can't blame him considering he was forced on the soap.. and the show really didn't know what to do with him  and Rauch made him feel unwelcome to boot.  I'm sure he enjoyed hanging with everyone when not at the studio.. but I think he doesn't view his time there fondly.. and I can't blame him.  
    • Bill is super annoying. He had no reason to go to the Duprees house other than to try to stay connected to them. At first I thought Kat was going to play only part of that recording so it would be easier to implicate just Eva. That Cody guy seems like he might end up being a stalker. Still adjusting to this recast and I'm already seeing the character's aesthetic has changed. At one point it seemed like Robinson tried to make his voice sound deeper and it seems like Tricia Mann-Grant slightly dialed her performance style to fit with his less imposing presence. Reminds of how the character of Lionel Jefferson changed when he was recast with Damon Evans after Mike Evans left.
    • Andre having mommy issues is an intriguing thought. Vanessa is quite the thirsty thot.
    • I can see that...especially after her phone call with her mother.
    • LOL!  You're right, I'm out of my mind   This is me reacting to your post (if you know Phaedra Parks at all):  

      Please register in order to view this content

      Anyway, thanks for breaking it down for me. Sounds like I need Friday happy hour!  
    • The post 1795 present day stories started out promising once Victoria came back from the past and she was trying to make sense of the past.. while adjusting to the present.  The scene where she and Liz find Peter's grave and she expressed guilt over her actions in the past causing Peter to be accused of her crime and ending up being hung was well written and acted.   It would have been perfect had she mentioned that two men that were important to her were now dead (Burke/Peter). And Angelique invading the Collins family in the present day was a result of Victoria's visit to the past and realizing that Barnabas was out and about in the 20th century started promising with her causing Liz to become paranoid about death (a call back to her paranoia over 'killing' her husband Paul).. and Victoria instantly knowing who she was and trying to warn Julia. It's a shame that shortly after those first episodes back in the present post 1795 ended up becoming too focused on the ghouls/monsters... and downplaying the more soapy elements.  
    • I recently watched the premiere of Santa Barbara. I had never seen it. Most of my knowledge of the show is from 1988 onwards. I know of the show before that, but it's from recaps or individual clips/stories (having seen some of the carnation killer stuff). I can see why SB was not well thought of during its first year. The first episode is not that good. The acting is all over the place with only Robin Wright and Lane Davies making much of an impression. Everyone else is either given little to do or just too overeager/overwrought. Ava Lazar is beautiful but awful. I don't know how long she stays, but my word she is bad. Peter Mark Richman tries, but he's very one note as C.C. There's very little of the Dobson wit except for the few seconds with Anderson's Mrs. Lockridge. Interesting how Kelly is set up as the show's main heroine at this point and Eden is given just a brief mention.  I will say that Valorie Armstrong is a compelling presence, but I know she doesn't last long based on what I know of the show. A shame as they do set up the show to have different economic backgrounds and they also have the Andrades. That was completely gone by the time I started watching. I don't think the Andrades last long either because I don't remember seeing Rosa or Santana when I started following SB in late 88. Santana comes back briefly at some point (I think to kidnap Brandon) but then disappears and then she reappears when the Dobsons return for round 2 but that's with Wanda De Jesus. Did Rosa return then? I don't remember. This premiere episode would not make me keep watching if I didn't know what was to come. @DemetriKaneI just watch when I feel like watching the soaps. I'm an emotional watcher so sometimes I will watch a batch of episodes and other times I watch one or two a day. As I'm watching Edge of Night and Dark Shadows, I can get two or three a day if I'm disciplined.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy