Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The funniest thing Marland ever wrote (unintentionally ) was someone throwing pregnant Dana off a balcony or something, and characters were having a conversation in front of a window and there goes Dana flying by....and she was okay?!?!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2971

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1716

  • P.J.

    823

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted (edited)

 

I agree, @DRW50.  Marland must've realized what he was doing - right down to Doug and Darryl having the same initials, lol! - and tried writing his way out of it.  Unfortunately, in doing so, he made an already complicated mystery even moreso.

But, on the other hand, I always chalked up the parallels or similarities to being in line with Frannie's tragic flaw: a basically nice, sweet girl, who nevertheless has a lousy time picking men.  (And when I say "lousy," I mean REALLY lousy, lol).

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Yes.

I did like Larry. Toward the end of his run, they did play up more of a sanctimonious, unlikeable side (even before they had him cheating), but I put that on the poor state of the writing and also the inevitable result of having to deal with KMH's Emily. Before then he did seem like a supportive, nice guy, with an easy sense of humor. I can see viewers in 1991 wanting him to be happy, especially as there was enough turnover in the male cast to where the only other young guys around were angsty Caleb, Andy, Holden, etc.

The Sean story was so odd. I'd love to see Marland's story plans for 1990 because I have the issues with that year which many seem to have with 91 and 92. Much of what is done is aborted halfway through (like the Sean story or "scheming" Lily) or spinning in circles due to impending cast departures (Paul/Emily). And the last gasp of Tonio, which still goes well into 1991.

The Casey right to die story is excellent (this is the story that got me hooked on ATWT) as is Kim/Bob/Susan. So much of the rest is a scramble.

Burke Moses is charismatic and handsome but his energy is anathema to the Marland era - he's always about to rip someone's head off. That may have been Marland's biggest flop of a storyline.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

It's interesting to see in the long story doc that Marland flat-out says Andy Kavovit looks younger than he is and that it will be a major problem for them going fwd. I think he's intimating a Paul recast. I love what I've seen of Kavovit in the role but I can understand the concern; he still looks youngish today. (This problem was not dissimilar to Chris McKenna's Joey at OLTL not long after, where they ultimately felt they had the same issue.) Putting him onscreen with Melanie Smith was very bold given that juxtaposition, not that I'm disapproving. But you wouldn't have been surprised if someone turned the dial to CBS in the afternoon and suddenly thought they were watching a French film or something.

Burke Moses went on to be one of Alex's mob pals on OLTL, I think.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would argue that there are multiple cases of ingénues experiencing repeated trauma, but to demonstrate growth, they are usually a damsel-in-distress the first time, and the second time they have more agency.  For example, Hope (DOOL) and Felicia (GH) became independent, in the eyes of the audience, once they were able to use the lessons learned from prior trauma to save themselves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He did.

Smith and Kavovit worked well together for what the Emily/Paul relationship was meant to be at that time. I do understand why Paul had to be recast, even if I really liked Andy in the role...it's a shame they screwed it up so much.

I wish the show hadn't put them together again later on, as it never really worked - the layers of those first few years were completely ignored as Paul was just an empty suit and Emily was a grab bag of misogyny and histrionics.

This aspect makes sense - unfortunately they never got to explore it onscreen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

It was obvious to me they did that because they were desperate to find any port in a storm for Roger Howarth by that point after several dud stories and a hostile audience, and leaned on an old pairing and a somewhat popular vet. Not dissimilar to the Becky Herbst safe harbor at GH years later, although I'd argue Becky is much more popular at GH than KMH was at ATWT. I do remember the Howarth diehards trying to will "Pem" into being a big deal at the time, because they knew he had a very rough ride at ATWT in those early years not ever really being accepted as Paul and all his love interests were either dead or off the show. It never fully happened for the couple with those actors as far as I can tell, but Howarth didn't get fired, which is all that mattered to his fanbase.

I would've tried to keep AK as long as possible, but I understand the issue. My feeling with young-skewing actors is to always keep them if they're quite good, well-liked and photogenic enough, whether it's Kimberly McCullough, Christie Clark or Erin Torpey or males like Kavovit, Chris McKenna, Scott DeFreitas, Eddie Alderson et al. You just write to the youthfulness or contrast it/make it edgy, as the affair with Emily did. (Of course it's not like a recast didn't work out for OLTL with Nathan Fillion, but that's a relative outlier.)

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would argue that didn't really work out for OLTL either, as they only gave him actual story for about a year; it just looks better because he had primetime success and spoke graciously about the show. I do get why they wanted to age Joey, and Nathan was a decent choice, even if he wasn't as good as Chris.

I do wish they had kept Kavovit - to be honest I was never sure whether he wanted to leave or was let go, as they were playing him with Tess before he left, so there was some potential story in place. Of course, if they had, he would have been dumped the way Scott Defrietas was for not being "hot" enough.

Howarth was always a terrible choice as Paul, but they were just picking a name out of a hat anyway. They should have just cast him as Hutch, or Teddy Hughes, or Mark Kasnoff. Hell, say he was Grandpa Hughes reincarnated. It's not as if anything he was going to do at the show was going to matter anyway, just as it never did at GH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I think Nathan as Joey was popular more for him and what he brought to it onscreen than for any of the stories, of which only one really worked. Still, he was a hit as a heartthrob. But I would've brought back Chris once Nathan hit it big in primetime and Chris had aged up a bit. They were very similar in personality and charisma even then IMO.

I know Andy Kavovit got his fair share of primetime, etc. around this period (The Young Riders?) so I think it worked out for him.

That was in the Sheffer era of populating the show with big soap names in forgotten core roles. It was a marketing strategy I could get behind, up to a point. As many fans with much more history with the show have articulated far better than me a lot of those character changes didn't fully work or were total 180s; I liked some that others hated. But I think Roger is when the worm officially turned though, and many future attempts also flopped. Scott Holroyd had been very well-liked as Paul (I still don't know why he never did daytime again), and Roger's first months were literally an embarrassing carbon copy of Todd Manning material and very OOC for Paul - almost identical to what he'd just been playing at OLTL in '03 - while his IMO considerable chemistry with both Martha Byrne and Cady McClain could not save bad story.

Had RH completely departed from form, and tried to do something more in the vein of the doomed Austin character from GH, playing it fairly straight, he might've done better. Or in another role, as you said. But that was not what they wanted, the same mistake GH later made by insisting on bringing him back as Franco. ATWT wanted to revamp Paul as snarky, evil daddy hallucination-plagued Todd Manning and Roger played it, tics, schemes, rambling and all, because he was just happy to no longer being playing an actual rapist anymore. (Something he enumerated at length in a recent podcast interview both of us are familiar with re: the Todd saga, and I am glad for his mental health he could leave OLTL even if I found his ATWT stint lousy - it clearly made him content and more stable to not be doing that kind of work anymore, and over time made him able to play material more earnestly again when he did return to ABC as Todd, etc.)

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Not a period of the show I enjoy revisiting, but I don't think this one was available before and I can't remember if it was ever posted here. The audio isn't great.

Please register in order to view this content

There are some good scenes here with Iva and John, and Lily and Iva (even if it is Iva having to shill for her deadbeat dad brother and his toxic relationship with Lily), although it's tough to hear them. 

Martha and Lisa are so emotional here - it seems much more like the actresses saying goodbye than the characters.

It still makes me sad that they dumped an actress of Lisa Brown's caliber, even if logically I know Iva had been wrung out. I still loved the character, no matter what.

Some decent stuff with Royce and Julie too, and Barbara and Hal, Hal's clear dissatisfaction with Fashions laying groundwork for the story that was one of the bright spots of 1994 (Barbara faking her own stalking).

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I think by the time Marland arrived, most of the story boom for David and Ellen had ended, although they still had more prominence than he'd give them. By this point, Henderson Forsythe had also begun spending more and more time away doing stage work. Maybe if he'd been promised huge stories, he would have been there more often, but I'm not sure. 

The show's last attempt at new story for Ellen and David had been retconning a grandson (Stewart). I'm not sure if Marland should have immediately dumped the entire set in that age range bar Frannie (especially since we hear so much about his "rules" which claim you aren't supposed to do this), but I don't know what long term value Stewart would have provided. In the long run, Ellen got more material out of her bond with Courtney than she probably would have had with her own grandson. And that's where Marland did a good job with Ellen, as counsel and community figure, even if I wish he'd allowed her to have more romance and a life of her own. 

I do wish they'd had Betsy in a more central role, especially as I am so impressed by Lindsay Frost's work. I think her being so tied to Steve and Lindsay never being as well liked by fans as Meg Ryan hurt her. 

I agree that Dee could have returned. I think Marland wanted a clean tree with Ellen, Susan, and Emily, but there were opportunities to have her interact with John and James and find a new life. Maybe Marland and Calhoun/Caso just thought she would be redundant, and the most popular Dee (Jacqueline Schultz) might not have wanted to return again due to some of her co-stars (and she noticeably did not return in 1991 after doing so in 1986).

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't really care about what the men are wearing, or not wearing.   What I care about is focusing on the writing and character development for each of the male characters. Andre really doesn't have a lot of character development that sets him apart from the other male characters except that he seems content to be degraded and mistreated by the elitist Dani.  I would like to know why a good looking younger guy like Andre would willingly be at the mercy of an emotional vampire such as Dani.   Martin, on the other hand, seems to have decent character development.. and it is partly due to how the actor chooses to recite his lines.  Martin was raised in a very privileged household and probably went to the best schools... so it makes sense that he would come across as thinking he was above everyone else.  Most people raised in a upper class situation as the Duprees would view themselves as better than others (it's the same trait Dani seems to employ on those she feels superior to). It makes me wonder how Nicole came out of that family being so warm and nurturing  when her family dynamics seemed very appearance oriented.    
    • I know, right. I after just re-reading the thread, I'm like ooppph!
    • Lulu and Dante were divorced before her coma, but she was still in love with him.  He just didn't know.  They haven't been married for years.    I was pretty mixed about Lulu getting involved when it was just a child out there in the world, but now that she realizes it's Gio I am okay with her telling Dante.  It also is her son's sibling.  I still think it's BLQ's choice though.  Lulu is in a rough spot because I think Dante will be mad if she keeps it a secret and Chase, Brook, Lois, etc will be mad if Lulu tells. Without veering too far into the classic area of the show, I had no problem with Robin telling AJ about Michael.  It may not have *exactly* been her place, but she could see how Carly was manipulating the entire situation.  It also ruined her romantic relationship with Jason for good.  Jason and Sonny were furious with Robin and practically ran her out of town, so I think we were to believe she was the bad guy.  It was a bit out of character for Robin to spill, but KMc was leaving the show.
    • Rewatching/binging THE X-FILES Seasons 1 and 2 (almost done). So much fun re-experiencing, especially re-discovering some of the monster-of-the-week stories. THE WEST WING Seasons 1 and 2 as well - so good to rewatch now with 20 years more life experience and understanding. ALSO.... lol FOOTBALLERS' WIVES Season 3, which is just as bonkers as I remember and so so so so fun. I had forgotten about that iconic season cliffhanger. Good times. Excited to rewatch Seasons 4 and 5 since I remember so very little about them. Hope you've been enjoying!
    • @Toups Tyler Topits listed in alpha order with the breakdown writers 5/12 Monday episode. O'Connor still listed as both breakdown and script writer. Kreizman wrote today's script.
    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy