Jump to content

B&B: Stephanie/Brooke Spoiler


Evan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Since it sounds like Brooke will be "lording" this secret over Stephanie, I doubt it is a Jill/Katherine scenario. High odds it involves paternity, since everything on the show revolves around family. We've already been down the road with ownership of the company, so that's not it. Illness, thought I doubt it -- could be compelling if it's a situation where Brooke helps Stephanie through it and they finally come to an understanding. If it's the "definite" storyline, this would make sense. After 23+ years of battling over Widge, even Stephanie knows that after the Oliver thing, Brooke and Ridge are together for good. The Bridget thing could work because we know what Mike did to Shield in the lab (I don't know if that was ever resolved conclusively), but then you have the icky Nick thing. (Re: theory of Brooke being Massimo's child -- Brooke has a child with Nick, too, so no paternity switch for her/Ridge/Nick. They might get away with incest with adults, but not if they've resulted in children -- that's a taboo and a curse that I don't think any audience would accept.) Right now, B&B's best s/l involves Bill/Katie/Liam/Hope (three outstanding actors, who are raising the bar for Hope). It was a good move to put her in a positive story right away as opposed to weeping over Brooke/Oliver, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like the idea of revisiting Bridget's paternity. That original story left open a huge mystery which was never resolved -- namely, who wrote and left that letter to Ridge telling him Bridget was not his daughter? And who killed the doctor who supposedly wrote the letter and di the paternity test. When Sheila and Mike were messing around with the test results when Bridget was a baby, they ended up not knowing WTF they were doing. I love that it is one of those secrets which has been in the ether for years and years - since the very early 90s, I believe. Bill Bell did love this kind of thing. Of course, Bradley is not WJB and it remains to be seen how this story will play out, IF it is even played out, or whether Brad will go a more sensationalist route.

Plus it focuses on Bridget, and I really REALLY like Ashley Jones' portrayal of the character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^^ B&B brings out the wild optimist in me, Sylph. No other show can do that but this ball of 18 minute trash. :lol:

It's as you said in one of the threads on DTS this weekend -- there is something about B&B which makes it easier to envisage being able to "salvage" the show and make it better, tighter, a richer viewing experience. It has the history, the mix of characters of all ages in search of a story, the loyal vets. Now it needs to overhaul its production and wardrobe departments (do it, Ed Scott!)and, most importantly, start writing emotionally resonent stories that actually stick. Why not, Bradley? Why not give it a try? For the hell of it. You really have nothing left to lose.

I'm sure it will cross the point of no return very soon as other shows have (if it hasn't already), though. But for now I can enjoy speculating about future SLs from the comfort of SON.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

After thinking about there are two reasons why I don't think it's about Bridget: 1) the character is involved in a show-eating storyline right now with Owen/Jackie and 2) so Brooke finds a letter that shows Stephanie knew or arranged a switch -- that's hardly a relationship defining S/L. I also would find it hard to believe that Stephanie would have stood back while Bridget got involved with Nick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm gonna be optimistic and hope that Brad really has something up his sleave which is NOT connected to a WTD-story.

Maybe we're gonna see someone from the past as part of this twist. Maybe Stephanie has been writing love letters to James Warwick, just as Brooke is ready to discover her lust for him. :lol: Everything is possible.

If Brad actually WERE smart, Brooke's discovery would lead to a reveal that Bill Spencer Sr. is actually alive and kicking... Two Evil-Bills would be delicious!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know Daphnee's back hurts, because she was carrying Maurice through those scenes! Still not loving the idea of replacing the actor, but he was giving very little.  Brandon's scenes with Leslie did not hit the way they were supposed to because I was busting out laughing.  One thing I enjoy about this soap is how it plays with the nuance of good and evil. Kat vs Eva and Anita vs Leslie. There are some things that Kat and Anita said that makes it hard to root for them and how the Duprees can be family over everything to a fault. It almost makes them come across as entitled and unlikely at times. And while what Lesile and Eva have done is wrong in different ways, you can see that hurt and sympathize.  Now, what I don't get is what Lesile thought she was doing expecting the Duprees to accept Eva with open arms. Honey, Eva is a Richardson not a Dupree. In the Dupree world, she's Ted's problem unless they choose otherwise, because there ain't a drop of Dupree blood coursing throught her veins (unless we learn otherwise in some twist). Ted is lucky if they don't disown his ass.   
    • I think maybe viewers needed a break from Aaron Spelling by 1985 or 1986. He had a series, Macgruder and Loud, which I recall, even as a young teen, getting TONS of promotion with even a post-Super Bowl slot, and it failed. Viewers probably were - as said here - tired of soapy fare and went elsewhere. But they must have missed him since, as we know, Spelling rose from the TV ashes in the '90s with Beverly Hills 90210 and Melrose Place!
    • I’ve been enjoying the pace the show has taken recently. Things don’t languish as long as they have and if they are drawing something out, like Gio’s adoption, it’s hasn’t been as excruciating. Also, my nosey nature would appreciate less interaction with posters I have on ignore so I don’t have to click on “options”.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Okay...I'm just going to call it. Ambyr Michelle is the breakout star of this show with the young set hands down! There is no character like Eva that pulls my heart strings, and she's playing it perfectly. If Eva and Leslie are on, it's a good episode! If written properly, Eva and Kat's rivalry is one that could go on for YEARS. Of course, it's fun to speculate about who is really whom, but I could see them developing as frenemies after some time. They really need a guy to tussle over to amp it up. Tomas is pretty, but the actor has got to loosen up some in his scenes, I think. He is improving though. It would be good to introduce a new young man in that story for a foursome.  Martin and Smitty finally feel like a real couple to me, too. Hopefully, they locked them into four year contracts.
    • I'll be that guy and say I don't think TMG is a fool. This is a popular contract role on a year-round soap opera for a woman of a certain age (to say nothing of a woman of color). If I'm her I pull a Kimberlin Brown and ride this til the wheels fall off.
    • Tbf it's not unusual for a family when they are dealing with some bad news that changes a life to use song to give out hope.Especially black families. I personally had to deal with that very thing this weekend. Partly off putting, but at the same time, I did get the point and it gave me a bit of hope in the moment.      MM is definitely acting. But Smitty is just so passive. It could turn into quiet strength at some point, but for now...passive IMO. 
    • Am I remembering correctly that the Madison's lived in a Spanish revival-style house? I have a vague recollection of the fireplace looking especially Spanish in style. It is unusual that Montecello had so many architectural styles.  Obviously, that might occur IRL.  But, look at other east coast soaps and there is a definitive style that is throughout (because it was styled by a set decorator) regardless of the income of the occupants.
    • @kalbir MSW was a powerhouse for CBS. Angela Lansbury was a superb actress. In 1985, TV viewers were tiring of the primetime soaps and the like. People wanted storytelling and MSW was great at that and had great guest stars. Storytelling -- an amazing and novel concept. CBS Daytime by 1985 was beating ABC so CBS was on the upswing.
    • I'd say just the opposite - conflict means they will find out and then be at odds. For the limited amount of time people on this show have conflict (if they aren't named Nina or Ric, I guess).
    • Totes mcgoats (aka I agree). But, now the character needs to move forward.  Clyde's exit was 12/11/24.  It is May.  She and Chad have been on one date. I don't think they've slept together. And she was only planning on sticking around for a year.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy