Jump to content

B&B: October Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Alcoholic mess, pushing drugs illegally on her ex, killing beloved supporting characters, making new outrageous romantic choices every six months.

No.

To me, the right nemesis for Brooke is someone who is stable...consistent...makes good choices. That is Brooke's ultimate opposite.

I don't see Taylor as a lead, but as a minor supporting character at the best of times. She (like Brooke and Ridge) is really too old for the romantic triangle at this point. She is NOT a viable "matriarch" in any sense.

Time to go. FAST!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I agree with you about the pushing drugs on Ridge. I think some of the other stories, like accidentally killing Darla, then falling in love with Thorne, or her battle with the bottle, could have been better with a stronger core. Instead, Taylor, IIRC, dumped Thorne (was it at the altar?) after she got together with him after Darla's death, which I thought made her look terrible.

I've always seen Brooke/Taylor as one woman being essentially good at heart but making bad choices and being easily seen in the worst light, and the other woman as being essentially selfish, or weak, but making better choices, and being easily seen in a glowing light. I also hoped they would eventually move the women on to other rivalries. Unfortunately when they tried we ended up with mistakes like Brooke/Deacon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Let's Make A Deal needs to tank...BADLY...so that it's losing money for CBS and not retaining audience for the affiliates for their syndication blocks.

Then B&B can expand to an hour, and it can accommodate these folks. Though I'd then like to see someone with more skill elevated to HW, under BB's EP status

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B will never expand to an hour. Not in this economy. These days it has little to do with international airings and everything to do with studio costs and expansion.

And Brad Bell giving up Head-Writer? LOL. Forget it.

And Let's Make a Deal will do its job: provide low-cost programming for CBS. Even if it underperforms, by the looks of the studio, the way the show is shot, etc. this looks even cheaper than The Price Is Right. Almost a fraction. And the prizes they give away are a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Also, where would they stick hourlong B&B anyway? In Deal's current timeslot? In some markets, Deal airs after The Early Show. In others it airs in GL's old timeslot.

And would Barbara Bloom really stick her neck out to expand and promote a show that she has no creative control over?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I admit it is a pipedream. But this was in reference to the Fisher-Baldwins coming to B&B. :lol:

Well, the idea is that GL left a 60 minute whole. Expanded B&B could use 30 minutes of it, and some other game show (Joker's Wild? Card Sharks? Name That Tune?) could take the other 30 minutes.

But I know this will never happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good point. And think of all the amazing 30 minute soaps that used to grace the airwaves, from "The Edge of Night" to "Ryan's Hope" to "Love is a Many Splendid Thing" to "Love of Life." These shows only had half an hour to weave wonderful stories and they did it beautifully, for the most part. In fact, one could argue that the downfall of soaps started when they expanded to one hour. It's way too taxing for the writers to come up with creative stories for five hours of original drama every day, fifty-two weeks a year. You either get uninteresting filler or repetitive plots. The soaps today would benefit by returning to 30 minutes, tightening their cast and storytelling. Maybe they'd even have some rehearsal time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IA that all soaps should consider adopting the 30 minute format. Well, technically 19 minutes.

Every time Jacqueline MacInnes shows up on screen, it looks like she's had yet another cosmetic procedure done. Darkened, hair, colored eyebrows, new veneers, inflated lips... this time, it looks like an eye-lift. Maybe it's just the make-up but, really. Wardrobe needs to pick a look for her and go with it. All these Steffys are confusing me. Tomboy Steffy. I-look-just-like-Hunter Steffy. Bratz Steffy. Malibu Steffy. Sailor Steffy. Who is this doll?

Duh, yeah, Brooke, the WillSpen corporation is a cover for Bill Spencer! With brainiacs like that, no wonder FC is haemorraging money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Forgot to add: seeing that video of Bill Spencer, Sr (original Bill) makes me really wish B&B had not killed him off.

Still love Bill (Jr) and Katie. DD and HT are bringing it. Also, I never thought Tom was an outright stunning-looking woman but on B&B recently, she has been looking breath-taking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy