Members Mitch Posted December 14, 2019 Members Share Posted December 14, 2019 YES!!! Accidents keep happening to Reva...er..what the hell did they call her, and we think its Eddie and Liv who are always caught conspiring behind a palm tree, but it is really the crazy Aunt, and it all just because Reva annoys the hell out of her! I see Robin Strasser in a wig but I don't think you could have Zimmer and Strasser on the same set without huge chunks being devoured. He was absolutely the WORST..I mean, Reva went for annoying sometimes...(Buzzard) but never boring! It was made worse that he of course was part of the San Crud clan, and he went from a doctor with a fine taste in art (though played by a guy who made Grillo look like a scientist) and then a secret agent??? Yea, it was weird, again instead of San Crud it could have been Kyle who found Reva and kept her hidden all those years... and Liv could be the woman he married once he thought Reva was dead..again...Alan at that time had run his course, not only because of RR's bombastic air but he was just done. I would have killed Alan off and had Phillip move up to patriarch and have Kyle be the thorn in the Spaulding side, uniting them with the Lewis clan to fight off his attacks. Or maybe Kyle's new wife is Amanda..(what do we think of CC as Amanda, still too young?) who is using Kyle to help her make her rightful claim on Spaulding. Peter came back with RealDylan for H.B.'s funeral and Van hugged him but it seemed more like a doting Aunt then his Mom. I wish they had addressed that as it was such a big plot point, but I could see Van letting Peter go with Bridge but staying in his life. Good God no.Jessie and Simon needed to fade in the past as they rightfully did, 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DramatistDreamer Posted December 14, 2019 Members Share Posted December 14, 2019 They wouldn't have to bring back either of the parents though. I wouldn't have minded grandma Calla dropping in, every now and again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Franko Posted December 14, 2019 Members Share Posted December 14, 2019 Simon and Alex's dynamic seemed to be all over the place in 1986. Also, enjoy Bev making a sound that defies description. Please register in order to view this content 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Mitch Posted December 17, 2019 Members Share Posted December 17, 2019 LOL...Warren seems waayyy too happy to be introduced to Simon in that clip! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Franko Posted December 18, 2019 Members Share Posted December 18, 2019 He really did. Just unashamedly checking him out. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members KMan101 Posted December 18, 2019 Members Share Posted December 18, 2019 This has been one of my biggest issues for just about all the soaps for a long time 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DramatistDreamer Posted December 19, 2019 Members Share Posted December 19, 2019 No doubt, part of it stems from their own personal desire to create a brand-new character whose history they can totally make up without having to regard the show's history--but then they end up making up some silly connection to a longtime character anyway to "anchor" the new character. What's the point of this if you're going to connect to a longtime character in the end?? To mess up the longtime character's history by inserting events that never existed? The other part, I suspect, stems from sheer laziness and belligerence- not wanting to do any research about the existing characters' connection to other longtime characters. Had they got it right though, it would actually enrich the show's canvas, but I realize asking these writers and production folk to get things right is probably a big ask. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
victoria foxton Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 Please register in order to view this content ''GUIDING LIGHT'' September 5 & 6, 2001 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members kalbir Posted January 1, 2020 Members Share Posted January 1, 2020 I've gotten through all of 1993 and I'm planning to watch 1994 until Nancy Curlee leaves the writing team. I know Alan returned in summer 1994, and Annie Dutton arrived in fall/winter 1994, but are any of the post-Curlee 1994 storylines worth watching? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
victoria foxton Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 Everything after Curlee is a boring mess. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted January 1, 2020 Members Share Posted January 1, 2020 I loved Curlee. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soaplovers Posted January 1, 2020 Members Share Posted January 1, 2020 Actually, Pam Long wanted to bring Rita back.. but the actress turned down the offer to return. And while I enjoyed early 90s GL.... on second viewing, while it is structurally sound and strong story-wise under Curlee.... there is a lack of spirit/warmth/energy that populated GL in the late 80s when Curlee/Long were co-head writing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Khan Posted January 1, 2020 Members Share Posted January 1, 2020 (edited) For several months during the fall and winter of '97-'98, GL appeared to rally again with James Harmon Brown and Barbara Esensten as HW. It wasn't anywhere as brilliant as the Curlee/Demorest era had been, but it was still entertaining (if, at times, simplistic). Unfortunately, it didn't last. Edited January 1, 2020 by Khan 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soaplovers Posted January 1, 2020 Members Share Posted January 1, 2020 @Khan I always viewed Harmon Brown and Esensten as turnaround writers... meaning that they could steer a direction less ship onto the right path.. but weren't capable of steering the ship to greener pastures. I viewed their work in 1994-1995 on Loving & 1997 on GL as examples of how they managed to rescue a sinking ship and direct it the ship onto the right path... but the reigns should have than been handed to a strong head-writer that could steer the ship (For example, Bedsoe Horgan did wonders for ATWT so that when Marland took over, the ship was already on the right path). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DeliaIrisFan Posted January 2, 2020 Members Share Posted January 2, 2020 I am just about a year behind in those early '90s episodes on YouTube - well, slightly less now, after I binged the episodes surrounding Maureen's death today. All of the cast turnover in 1992 had definitely taken its toll, although unlike some on this board, I always loved Liz Keifer as Blake and have enjoyed seeing her first months on the show. I know Ellen Parker's departure will only add to the bleeding of talent, but I must admit I'm also glad to get to see a year or so with Nancy Curlee back at the helm of the writing team. Watching full episodes now, I can totally see why Beverlee McKinsey singled Curlee out with praise in her exit interview. There was plenty of high-stakes drama as 1992 drew to a close - and I am inclined to credit Stephen Demorest, Lorraine Broderick, and Wisner Washam, not to mention the dialogue writers for staying (mostly) true to the overall tone that Curlee and Co. had previously set. But the intelligence in the writing declined noticeably throughout the year that Curlee was gone, while cliched soap opera plot devices and glimpses of the kind of misogyny I have come to associate with several of their collaborators in the decades since were cropping up more and more in the writing. The 1991 episodes were just sooo much better, IMO, and despite the loss of some major talent while Curlee was on leave, I recall there is a lot of good stuff still to come in 1993. Speaking of the writing credits, I started Googling Bill Elverman, who was credited with the other dialogue writers, several months ago. I was intrigued by several of the episodes he scripted (including the Alex/Mindy hair-pulling episode, and several others with strong material for Vanessa, Maureen, etc.) and didn't recognize his name from other work in the soap biz. He was on the writing team for at least a year, apparently right up until he died in 1992 - of AIDS, at 40 years old. Please register in order to view this content He wrote an off-Broadway play that was reviewed by Frank Rich in the New York Times (not favorably, but this was a good ten years before his work on GL and I tend to think he honed his craft in the interim), as well as several other plays that sound interesting - what a loss. The recent discussion in this thread of Beverlee McKinsey doing a cameo on GH to keep her union insurance makes me wonder (hope) that someone working at GL helped Elverman get some work that would ensure he had coverage. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.