Jump to content

Y&R: Fire Maria Arena Bell, Hogan Sheffer, Scott Hamner, and Paul Rauch


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Again, you're missing the point. No matter how well executed (thanks to Curlee and team), killing Maureen was a tragically flawed decision that cost GL in the short and long term. This isn't the kind of decision making I have any confidence in. If a "horrible mistake" is "very well done," does it make it any less a "horrible mistake." Absolutely not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 260
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

But it cost the show in major ways in the long-run, so what's the point? The goal is to HOLD your audience and BUILD on it, not do something that, while beautifully executed, alienates the audience and starts to gnaw away at their confidence in the producers or writers of a show. So much of what's wrong with daytime today can be traced to EPs and HWs who have lost the trust of the audience. Such is the case for JFP IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I definitely think Maureen's death was fatal long-term error, but I think GL did much worse in the years following that really sent the show to it's current death. Maureen's death might have started a chain of events, but the show could have easily found a matriarchal figure to take Maureen's place. Hell, Meta's role should have been expanded upon, but it really wasn't. Vanessa could have also taken on a bigger role, but Maeve Kinkead was forced off in following years. I think too much of GL's downfall is placed on Maureen's death, when so much worse happened afterwards that really damaged the credibility and integrity of that show in more profound ways.

No show is really holding on to any audience or building on it anymore. I'm not calling for JFP to join Y&R, but she's really no better or worse at running a soap opera than people like Sheffer, Hamner, Rauch, or Maria Bell. Y&R can;t even do plot-driven and stunt heavy drama correctly with this regime.

I think Y&R needs someone with a strong vision and strong leadership skills. Something no one at the show currently has. Y&R lacks vision and direction, more so than a lot of other soaps at the moment, IMO.

Again, it's all about the stories. Not about big budgets, and even with network and corporate interference, a quality product can be produced. The thing is, we have no one working in daytime at the moment that can handle the genre or the demands it brings. I think the argument that daytime is dying and these are the final year, so we have to accept it is total bull. No one is fighting for quality stories anymore, they're just happy with the status quo and to collect a pay check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GH's production has improved tremendously since the switch to HD. The show isn't dark or shadowy anymore. The lighting is quite cinematic and the colours really pop on the show.

Comparing Y&R and GH in HD, just on aesthetics alone, GH wins hands down these days. It's a shame, Y&R used to be so cinematic and beautifully produced, I can't say so anymore. Y&R's look used to very much be apart of its identity, and that's gone now, for the most part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

DAYS does seem to be holding its audience and building on it. That's the current tend anyway. I think that gives hope to the other soaps, including Y&R. But Y&R has to get back to what it used to do best: romance, relationships, intriguing stories that touch the heart. They don't need to copy anyone. They don't need to amp things up (if anything, they need to slow things down, find the beats and mine them). They don't need to look to GH, which is fumbling badly all on its own. As for your statement that "no one is fighting for quality stories anymore, they're just happy with the status quo and collect a paycheck," I just don't buy it. That may well be true at the top, with Frons and Bloom and even some of the EPs and HWs. But there are writers in the genre who love it, who want to see it succeed for many more years, but who don't have the power and can't make the kind of big changes that could save shows. The power resides at the top, like most of the decisions, which is a shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All the money spent on GH's aesthetics don't mean a thing if it doesn't translate into ratings. The problem isn't the sets or lighting on this show, it's the godawful storytelling. The dark and depressing plots. Again, I go back to Bill Bell's mantra: give the audience two engaging actors, a great story and sharp script, add in a waterfall -- nope, no need for the waterfall." GH has got the waterfall, in HD no less. But it hasn't had the story for a long, long time. (I could argue Y&R hasn't either, but you see my point.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Gary Tomlin came into DAYS with a very specific direction and vision that he was fully committed to and fought for it. Not only has DAYS stabilized in the ratings and is actually growing, it has definitely stabilized creatively. DAYS used to be the most inconsistent and polarizing soap on the air, now it's just the opposite.

As for Y&R, I don't think Maria, Sheffer, Hamner, and Rauch particularly specialize in the old Y&R way of doing things, and I don't think they want to, hence why we have the show we have now. There seems to be mandate at Y&R to ignore the show that it once was.

But that's the thing, unless we get people who care and fight for quality and a stable vision as network heads, HW's, and EP's, nothing is going to change. The ruling class in daytime that we have now is just content with the way things are, they don't want to go back to basics and what used to work. It's all about the short term, not the long term, sadly.

Who do you think can save Y&R creatively, SOAPSFOREVER? What writers and producers would you suggest?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's true, but then, Guza writes the show. I'm not a JFP fan, but if we are only judging on production values, and the vision which tries to make the wretched, history-aborting storytelling somewhat tolerable, then it's not that bad.

Right now Y&R is sort of falling down in all areas. They are relying on the goodwill of people who are no longer involved with the show, and at times are almost gleefully destroying much of what those people created.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do agree that storytelling comes first, but I had to make a post about the aesthetics at each show. LOL!

Soaps looked aesthetically awful up to the 80's, but it didn't matter, they were gripping and took their time to tell character driven stories that connected with their audience. This hasn't been done for years, and no one wants to go back to basics. I think too much is blamed on budget, when really, soaps had awful budgets from the 50's to 70's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Members

I'm bumping this thread to discuss this, and really it should be bumped given the dissatisfaction most people posting here have with Y&R and its writing team.

It's really atrocious writing, if they wanted to move Sharon out, they could have had Adam ask her to move to the Ranch with him and Ashley, since these two are married (another rushed plot point). There was no need to destroy that set to prop a character (Daisy) that no one cares about.

These writers so need to be fired this year, the show is too far gone now, and this sloppy and downright horrific storytelling has gone on for months now. It's time for some behind the scenes shake-ups at Y&R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, which is on par with similar ratings growth from previous years during the Holiday's...

And let's see where they are after the holiday's to brag about this 3.9...

Also, I'm still waiting for Toups to confirm this bit of information. ONE 3.9, WOW. Let's see if they can sustain it, which I doubt they will.

Latham consistently got above a 4.0 and above, I guess they never should have let her go either, right? :rolleyes:

They destroyed one of their longest running sets all to prop this worthless newbie character Daisy, when they really didn't need to.

Really, they invest more in their flavour of the month newbies than they do to any history of this show...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy