Jump to content

GL: September Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 212
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I never thought they'd get back together either, at one time I never even thought Jordan Clarke would be back on the show. I know they deserved more airtime but as someone who has loved this couple for ages I'm glad they will be together again when the curtain falls.

I keep thinking about so many people on this show who felt like family to me. Bridget and Maureen and Alex and Roger and Holly and Ed and Ross and Blake and Nadine and Harley and Gilly, and so many others. And I keep thinking about when I watched GL at my grandmother's house, and the various strangers I slowly pieced together in their relationships. Remember the days when there was no soap website which would tell you everything about everyone, and you would be shocked to suddenly learn so and so had once been married, or had an affair?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

God, today's episode was draining. Seriously, I'm exhausted. I started crying when I saw Billy and Vanessa and I don't think I stopped until 11. Great family scenes with the Lewises and Reva. I even liked the added nugget that reminded viewers that Reva was initially brought to town by Alan to break up Vanessa and Billy, even though the dialogue was rather heavy-handed IMO. And the scene with Billy and Alan at FauxTowers.

But ever since I've watched the episode, a rant has been brewing in me. This is what the show should have been about. Why did it take cancellation for someone upstairs to think "Ya know, maybe we should actually give the fans what they want to see?" I would have loved to have seen a longterm storyline showing Vanessa seperate from Matt (logically) and grow closer to Billy, dealing with her hurt from all those years before when Billy descended into alchoholism again and shot Roger, leaving her alone during a brutal custody battle. And we should have seen Billy charm the pants off of her, but genuinely remorseful and trying to get his life back on track for her. Who would NOT have wanted that? Instead we got force fed couples and stories that an amateur could have written. I have YET to see a fan of Mallet and Marina. Never mind Cassie and Josh, Reva and Jeffrey.

I just saw a great spoiler for Bridget's return and I wonder, why couldn't that have been worked into a new storyline YEARS ago? Why couldn't they have recasted Peter, a child with ties to multiple families!? Instead we get Tom Pelphrey and his Zimmer-esque hammy acting and the Tammy/Jonathan pairing that ate the show whole. We get Rafe and Dim Bulb Daisy and Ashlee and Remy's idiot wife who is so forgetable I have yet to remember her name. It's absolutely incredible. That is why the show is so difficult to watch right now because even the great moments with family and long-wanted reunions just underscore how many missed opportunities there have been during the Wheeler and Conboy regimes.

There. Rant over.

One bad thing about today is that I will never get used to seeing prim and glamorous Alexandra eating a hot dog (!) from a Quickie Mart (!!). The show has become such a poor-man's GL that it is really hard to watch sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree---I've finally gotten a little of the "community feeling" of Guiding Light back, when it's clearly too late. I FLOVE that Billy and Vanessa are reuniting, even if the story seems to be more focused on Reva's heartbreak than them.

I seriously think I have a block on it because her name's Christina and as far as I'm concerned, the only Christina worth watching on this show is Blake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like Christina, I think she's a good throwback to some of the random supporting characters who used to populate soaps but who can fit into most stories. Every soap needs tiers of characters. I think I'd hate her if she took up too much airtime, like Marina, but she doesn't.

Dan, great post about today's show.

Alex eating a hot dog doesn't bother me as much as it should, because Alex has always had something of the common touch (she lived in a hovel in Paris when she chose her true love over her family, after all). I was really annoyed when they had Alan standing around in the Quickie Mart, because Alan has always relished his blue blood. And he only seemed to be there to get into a p!ssing contest with Shayne. Has he had any interaction with Shane until then? I guess no one else was onset for that scene with Shayne.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unfortunately, the show still looks like [!@#$%^&*]. This production model is no model at all; Frank is in full makeup, says he's going to leave Company, and they immediately cut to some random street with no point of reference, as Frank, now with Beaver Cleaver moptop head, trundles up to Olivia in his "I'm a big boy" untucked shirt and frumpy slacks ensemble, and proceeds to give a big speech about how the world's gone mad and she should come to Natalia's sonogram appointment. Except we can barely hear his big speech because there's no proper sound equipment, and Frank is all but drowned out by a) ambient noise and B) the omnipresent shitty folk rock music. Later, Olivia gets the bad news from Phillip, but I can't hear a [!@#$%^&*] word they're saying thanks to that goddamn river. Then the other 65% of the episode is taken up by montage, sound and mute image all but smothering storyline, plot conveyed in heavy music video beats as opposed to dialogue or character; everyone becomes a rough thumbnail sketch of themselves as they pout and sigh around the sets or non-sets. Instead of talking about her issues, Olivia stands looking at the side of a house in the middle of nowhere. Image conveys what the show is too cheap and incompetent to begin to do. There's a lot to be said for montage technique as great art, in terms of how it can convey emotion and meaning, story and ideas. But when your show is nothing but bad montage, and the production values are nil, and the scripts are all but improv'ed, there is no core to uphold.

Everything is transitory, tissue-thin, slapdash; Maureen Garrett will appear for not one, but two episodes to do nothing (wow, two whole episodes?? Let's not get crazy!), while Ed delivers medical facts and stands around, and the long-missing Bridget Reardon is slated to play little more than an extra. And how about poor dying Phillip Spaulding? It's a good thing he was able to get most of his children to show up for his Viking funeral; we wouldn't want to overdo it by having, say, Zach show up when his father decides to tell his loved ones of his fate. And what about the Coopers (almost) going broke? Thank goodness the show didn't waste time by making, oh, say, Harley reappear when her family is in danger. I guess the hot dudes in Greece (and the pending criminal case against her) were too important for her or her son to return home to see to Buzz and Daisy. And don't ask Beth to have anything to do with the subplot about the publishing of Coop's last work; she can't hear you over the music!

I'm not surprised to hear about the rumored

That's typical Ellen Wheeler. She broke everything, she ruined it all, and now she wants to sneak out the fire exit after sort of half-assedly trying to "put everything back the way it was."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And yet Vee, despite all that, sometimes we STILL get a great performance from truly some of the best actors in daytime. It's not nearly as often as before March 2008, but the fact that they can still eke out a great performance is admirable. I've decided that anything good is a direct result of the actors and not the writing or the production. I refuse to credit Wheeler for anything.

As for today's show:

*F-U-C-K Otalia because the best same-sex romance on this show has and always will be Rick and Phillip, lol. They have as many ups and downs as Reva and Josh under their belt.

*I still hate the whole "Cyrus is Jenna's son" twist but it's at least a little better than the unknown relatives in England that Buzz schlepped Coop and Rocky to all those years ago. Despite the fact that Jenna's lack of family was one of the factors that caused Jenna to resort to crime That and a fiance that lost his money.

*I can't buy everyone's "Poor James" act. He's been nothing but a fuckup for the last several months. Oh boo hoo. He needs to grow a pair and grow up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy