Jump to content

Another World Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Mona, I disagree. I see similarities in Rachel & Erica just as I do Ada & Mona. Agnes wrote the troublesome daughter & her put upon mother 4 times. To me, it is clearly a trope. Agnes even talked about similarities/differences in Rachel & Erica.

This is the editor of the AW trivia book talking about Rachel & Erica.

Hordes of soap opera vixens through the years have been based to some degree on Erica Kane, played so deftly on “All My Children” for almost thirty years by Susan Lucci. Rachel Cory n`ee Davis, who started off on “Another World” as a scheming gold-digger is one of them. What separates Rachel from daytime’s other Erica Klones is the fact that Rachel Davis was introduced to viewers three years before Erica. In 1965, writer Agnes Nixon had completed the bible for “All My Children.” After Procter & Gamble optioned the project but passed on it, the bible went into a drawer. Nixon was asked, however, to take on head-writing duties at “Another World.” One of the first characters she introduced was Rachel Davis, a scheming model whose destructive relationships with men and obsession with material gain could be traced back to being abandoned by her father.

Edited by Contessa Donatella
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

And, this is Agnes in her autobiography, I think in some appendix. 

“On ERICA versus RACHEL, Erica was a very unique character. Rachel on Another World was her precursor to the public, but in fact I created Erica first, since I had written the bible for All My Children before I started head writing Another World. Rachel was a lower-class Erica, her mother was a cleaning woman, and her goals were not nearly stratostrepheric as Erica’s. Rachel just wanted to marry Russ or somebody with money. What Erica and Rachel have in common is they thought if they could get their dream, they’d be satisfied. But that dream has been very elusive.”– Agnes Nixon, Creator, ONE LIFE TO LIVE, ALL MY CHILDREN, and LOVING

Oh, okay. I will re-read what you said then. Sorry. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please don’t be so fast to correct everyone on the board. Check the credits of the June 23, 1999 episode.  The zookeeper played by Chet Carlin was indeed named Sam Ratcliffe

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Ridiculous that they would choose to honor Sam Ratcliffe, when he was no more important than any of the directors during AW's golden age (1965 through 1979).  If they were going to honor directors (which is unusual to begin with), why choose him?   How about honoring some characters, or actors, or head-writers??  No, no, no!!  Goutman insisted, "There will be no returns and no reflection on the past."  But we did get a gorilla and a nod to Sam Ratcliffe.  Why must everything be a joke??   

I mean no disrespect to Mr Ratcliffe, but just because he was a favorite of Linda Dano and Stephen Schnetzer doesn't seem like a very good reason to honor him.  Just my opinion, of course.

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

How cool that they listed him in the credits!!! But, still, I do not believe they said it in the show. Do you? That is, of course, what I was speaking of.  And as far as the other goes, we tend to get on rather well here & sometimes one person has the best info, sometimes someone else, a third person, a new person, it all mostly comes out in the wash. Given how much bad info is out there, being a fan of good info just seems like a good thing to me. 

I got the biggest kick out of tweeting with Carolyn Culliton about her namesake & with Jean Passanante about Lumina. And, Patrick Mulcahey about early Texas/AW. Twi/X is so degraded now that it would never happen again. 

Mona, Sam was a writer not a director. I'm not sure if you were confused on that point or not. If I misunderstood, skip it. 

 

Edited by Contessa Donatella
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I was just mistaken.  I thought he had been a director.  But I stand corrected (as my 10th grade history teacher used to say).   I've always loved that phrase.  It's a polite way to admit one was wrong.   

But writer or director, my point still stands. 

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As to Goutman saying over & over we are not going to chase nostalgia. We have stories & we intend to tell them. Then what does he do, a gorilla harkening back to the zany comedy of the 80s. Which I hasten to say I loved but what is it if not nostalgic?

I get it that he tried to bring back Beverlee but when that fell through why not Carmen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love that you and I are coming from two different perspectives, yet we more or less agree. And I thank you for that.   

And of course -- why not Carmen?  For God's sake, Carmen was damned good as Iris.

And finally -- why go to the trouble of finding Sam Groom and flying him all the way from California, if he wasn't going to play Russ?? Especially since Russ's daughter (Josie) was still a major character.  Something has always been very fishy about all that.  I'll speculate that the intent was for Groom to return as Russ, but at the last minute someone at NBC or P&G said NO!  So Groom was given a day-player role.  Again, just speculation on my part.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, the gorilla keeper was referenced on air as Sam Ratcliffe. Cass mentions his name as he and Felicia are walking to the gorilla pit on the June 23rd episode. I watched the episode recently and remember the scene as they were talking about Wallingford. Richard and Carolyn are mentioned by name in the same scene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The gorilla stuff was nonsense and a waste of time. It was an insult to waste the previous few minutes of a show on that idiocy. I hated it. I don't care if it was a tribute to a good writer or not. I appreciate the accurate information though, and it's nice when people confirm information so thank you Watson.

I'm also glad Beverlee McKinsey did not return as Iris because she was not my Iris. Carmen Duncan was. I understand this is not true for everyone, but McKinsey was Alexandra and Duncan was Iris because I was not old enough to see McKinsey on AW or Texas. While I had given up AW yrs before it's end, I would have been angered if Iris had returned with McKinsey playing her. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wonder if Groom was supposed to return in the Summer of 99 as Russ as the show was cancelled?  Maybe the show gave him the part of the minister because of that?  Goutman kept saying that the show would not celebrate the 35th anniversary in May, but they had the summer to celebrate.

The gorilla stuff could have been skipped to give Rachel a few more minutes at the end of the show to reminisce and show some flashbacks as she swept through the Cory living room one last time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Anything to spare us the sight of the AW cast singing a James Brown song to soothe a savage gorilla, lol!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think the gross ickiness is Josh Griffith's intention. At birth, Ian Ward stole Mariah from Sharon, so that Sharon knew only of the Cassie twin and not the Mariah twin.  Sharon gave up Cassie for adoption at birth, never knowing that Mariah existed. When Ian Ward stole baby Mariah, he had her be raised by a woman member of his cult. She grew up in his cult. Years later, after Mariah was an adult in Genoa City and had left him, he tried to kidnap her to marry him himself, I sort of remember some icky scenes where he had arranged a wedding, but she escaped or was rescued -- it was so gross that I chose to forget it, and I don't want to look up the details. Mariah is feeling traumatized/triggered by Ian Ward being in Genoa City several months ago, because he was obsessed with her, and he terrorized her loved ones, interacted with Tessa, and drugged Sharon, which ultimately resulted in the death of Heather -- causing the grief of Daniel and Lucy. None of that was Mariah's fault. But she was so horrified by what happened, that she feels she did something wrong that caused this hateful villain to continue to obsess about her.   Based on small comments that Mariah made recently, I think she feels completely worthless. I gather that when she was away on the business trip a month or two ago, all of what happened with Ian Ward and Heather's death just hit her all at once and she was mentally/emotionally collapsing, and just felt unable to call for help.  During the business trip she sat in her hotel room and spiraled more, feeling more and more worthless and afraid. Finally she started drinking at a bar, and that's when the creepy old man approached her.  By that point, she wasn't in her right mind, and started interacting with the guy.  Either she thought he was Ian, or she thought he was someone like Ian, and she would be *required* to flirt with him in a role play, and do what he commanded, almost like old programming being reactivated.  Or perhaps just simple self-loathing playing out. I don't know if the guy actually knew Ian or Jordan, or if he was a random stranger.  But Mariah's fear/loathing/subconscious chaos kicked in. And then... well that's as far as her flashbacks have aired so far. She can't bear to face the rest of whatever it was.  I gather that in the coming episodes, we'll (eventually) find out what happened next as we see more of the icky flashbacks. --------------- The rest of this post is only my speculation: I think that she felt like she was supposed to have sex with him but didn't want to, and may have tried to kill him instead. Or he r*ped her.  Or they didn't have sex at all, but it's all convoluted in her mind.  Something horrible happened but I don't think it was her fault.  If the man died, maybe she covered it up?  I really don't know, I'm just speculating ideas. At any rate, I'm totally convinced that this is NOT a conventional "cheating storyline" where someone willingly has sex outside their relationship. ----------------- This is basically Josh Griffith's obsession with dark storylines, creepy villains, and terrible writing of "mental health issues".
    • The most we ever saw was on the "Roger years" tape.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy