Jump to content

Y&R: Week of May 04, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

So would Greg Foster, lol! He'd be to Y&R what Ross Marler once was to GL, and Paul Martin to AMC. Plus, it would be one way (out of many) to reintegrate the "old" Y&R (some Brookses, some Fosters and Katherine) with the "new" (some Abbotts and several Newmans).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would love it if Christine and Greg opened up a practice together... but I think Greg's return should be enough as far as old characters returning. Except if they bring Laurie back. That I would be down for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ok, we are going round and round. You would like Michael and Lauren off the canvas, and I don't. As for Michael taking his profession seriously, this is a soap. No way would Michael ever have been a lawyer again after his criminal past, but Bill Bell liked CLB and the character so much he wrote him back on the canvas after being away for four years. Michael is never going to be a white hat character. He is a gray character with a dark side who has shown growth over the years unlike some other characters who are making the same mistakes they made 15 or 20 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why? Just because someone leaving isn't a crushing blow, I completely disagree that they should be let go. Again, only about 10 people max would be a crushing blow if they left. Y&R has always had A, B, C and D stories. I like it like that. It wouldn't help the show in anyway to get rid of Lauren since TB is on recurring. Plus we have no way of knowing if MAB will choose to write more for Lauren in the future, but if all I can get is the occasional scene, I'll take it. She's part of the long term fabric of the show. And MAB may leave at anytime and the next HR may love writing for Lauren. LML obviously didn't like writing for Jill and Kaye, but I'm very thankful she didn't get it into her head to kill them or send them off, like she did to Ashley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just have no intention of watching Michael Baldwin defend people who he helped to cover up their crimes, like Gloria and Kevin. What a laughable lawyer and a laughable court case.

It gets boring after a while to have a criminal defending other criminals. A lawyer should be able to be completely separate from the crimes his clients commit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nobody is arguing that.

The problem is that he & his family ALWAYS self righteously use the law as a weapon with the justification that people look down on them cause they are low class instead of the horrible crap they DO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Love this! You are both adorable. Wow
    • I have not gone back to watch much of 1987, but from what I've seen lately, it doesn't feel like the writers or producers had any sort of plan. The show feels as if it's constantly in flux.  I will give it credit for this. It's watchable for the most part minus Lisa/Jamie which I find nearly unwatchable now.   I don't find Cheryl mousy. I think she has a lot of quiet strength, but she was saddled with the Scott romance which the writers did not invest in. She had a good friendship with Julie (also criminally underused), and her interactions with Ada were enjoyable as well. I also like Layman, but Spencer was extremely talented and when Cass returns, Schnetzer and Spencer have some wonderful scenes. Spencer also fits in with Alexander, Hogan, and Marie.  I'd forgotten just how much I missed seeing Wallingford. IT was so good to see him again. Even when they didn't have a major plot, Felicia/Cass/Wallingford/Mitch always brings a smile to my face.  
    •   Dani’s cute ass party planner. He gave me some tea but I was so drunk I don’t remember it.
    • NBC must have been grateful to have LHOTP, it's only hit and still strong after several seasons. Their next established show was Rockford Files at 45th. They didn't develop any comedies and relied on movies and mini series  which didnt establish viewer loyalty and habits. Their only new hit was mid season's Project UFO which debuted Feb up against Rhoda/On Our Own on CBS and How the West Was Won on ABC. It opened with a strong 36 share beating CBS and close to ABC as HTWWW had a 36 share over 3 hours. The next week UFO saw a respectable 32 share, then a 31 so it was slipping. A 28 share followed but a few weeks later it jumped back up to a 34. So no blockbuster but compared to what else they had, there was potential, So next season NBC sent it to Thursday up against Mork and The Waltons and it bombed.  They were smart to see potential in Chips, which took off on Saturdaysnext season. ABC was on a roll with Love Boat, 3's Company, Taxi, Eight is Enough adding to their hits. Their only real flops were Redd Foxx and San Pedro Beach Bums, an Aaron Spelling misfire. Like Redd Foxx, Harvey Korman was lured to ABC but his series was a filler that did well but was considered a time slot hit. Nancy Walker and Rob Reiner were also given series on the philosophy that not only were they popular names, their absence from popular shows like Sanford, Rhoda and All in the Family might weaken those shows. CBS were relying on old favorites. Betty White was strong the first few weeks then faded. Incredible Hulk was their strongest newbie. It was lucky for CBS that NBC was doing so badly or else some of their weaker shows would have really suffered.
    • That outfit looks like something Martin would wear lol.
    • Omg not we both ran into people from the show this weekend!
    • I guess he was let out the gates, because he's outside. 
    • Yup.  You can hate John all you want, but like seriously he was the cornerstone of the show for years.  So he should get a long ass funeral and burial and all the things because Drake and John deserve that.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      look who’s at a party I’m at
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy