Jump to content

Y&R/ Maria Bell losing their way?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Bravo post! And I second that!! And others do too. I've got my own PMs to prove it...LOL.

That's too bad. Maybe you should stop before you become Sylph Jr. of the board. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 225
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Not to take away from your latest struck pose, but I actually have a legitimate question, Sylph. Hopefully, it will begin to clear up the profound confusion some seem to have about your stance on the issues. If you can find a fraction of time in your obviously jampacked social and professional schedule, maybe you can answer it as though we ever spoke to each other remotely rationally. We'll call it another delightful hypothetical.

You ask (and by ask, I mean rhetorically ask, since you've already made your mind up) if soaps can appeal to both housewives and professionals, pre-assuming that they are of different intellectual levels. If there can be something in it that keys into what lovelorn women at home want to see as well as teens, as well as urban intellectuals or professional people of any age. You ask these questions - you've asked them more than once, in fact, not just in this thread - but it seems your answer is always an implicit "no," because you have decided the genre is dead. Any time anyone attempts to answer you, you simply toss off a post about how "this is very sad...seems things are staying the same, nothing is changing, very sad, what can be done, hmm." And just like that, your perspective is forcefully re-asserted, since you never really wanted a contradictory answer from anyone else.

But when you ask and answer your own question, you're forgetting something, as usual. In the '70s and '80s and '90s (and even today), Harding Lemay, Bill Bell, Agnes Nixon, Doug Marland soaps all appealed to large audiences. And the audience for the soap opera has always been more diverse than anyone is willing to admit to each other in polite company; not just housebound women and gay men, but professional people of all stripe, doctors, lawyers, teachers, writers, executives, artists. Everybody gets something out of it and always have, whether it's a guilty pleasure or a genuinely compelling storyline. And when these soaps were at their best in any of these eras (including some in the 90s, under Nancy Curlee or Linda Gottlieb), they provided literate, intelligent, innovative storytelling that broadens horizons and the limits of what they could do while also fulfilling the traditional needs of the genre.

As you know, many writers for soaps are and have always been playwrights, novelists, poets, etc. Throughout soaps' history, they've always been evolving and changing, playing with the definitions of what they are and what they can be - comfort food for the radio? a serialized women's picture? a limit-pushing torrid romance? a Shakespearean business/family drama? a social issues story? an action-adventure? a supernatural yarn? It always changes, because the format is fluid.

Many soaps are at a nadir right now, but depending on who you ask, there are still some talented people, probably at each show still on the air no matter how bad, attempting to put out quality work; maybe they don't succeed, maybe there's only something good one day of the week, maybe the HW or the EP or exec doesn't like it and so it doesn't make it on air, or maybe it doesn't appeal to everyone, like a Y&R or a OLTL. But the point is, there is still a difference of opinion, there is still differentiation no matter how faint you find it, and therefore, according to your own standards of examination, if there is difference, if there is a variety of opinion, if there is something someone enjoys, then there is still something to preserve. Haven't you been arguing for months or years that all the shows are the same now, that they all feel the same, look the same, taste the same, make all people feel the same? Well, take a look at this seven-page thread; clearly, they don't. Of course, everybody wants innovation and intelligent storytelling to return to daytime and take a firmer foothold; you act like you are the only one who holds this position, but everyone feels that way. The difference is, not everyone agrees with you that the only way to do those things is destroy all the soaps, burn them off the face of the earth and salt the dirt. And that, to me, seems to be all you ever talk (or rather, pout) about. And when you can't pout, then you knock people (or "sheep," as you'd probably call them) around watching them be unfailingly polite to you while you casually insult them and their intellect by inference.

So my question to you is this: If I'm wrong about you, then what do you want here? If you're not always making these threads and posts and cute little questions as a rhetorical device to "prove" to others that soaps are done for and we all need to do as you say, take our marbles and go home and let geniuses like you refashion the genre, otherwise we don't want intelligence and change - if that's not your only purpose, then why do you ask these questions and get more snide and abusive each time? I've given you some answers, and I'm not the only one. Either you agree or disagree with my answers, and that's okay, but what more can be gained from you asking us again and again and adroitly haranguing people about their "limited vision" and "lowered intellect and expectations"? The way I see it, no one's vision is limited here except yours; you're the one telling people, like Brian Frons, that it is your way or the highway. You've heard from people who disagree with you, yet you keep posing the same rhetorical questions again and again, growing more nasty, dismissive and arrogant each time. Like Charles Pratt!

The longer you stay here on this little board and insult other people for not having your sense of scope, Sylph, I assure you, the more time you will miss out actually transforming things substantively in a meaningful way as a writer. Maybe that's how you like spending your time. Or maybe, just maybe, there is more to the cosmos than your precious ideological purity, and maybe other people have just as much intellect and artistry as you without favoring the same self-serving solution. Maybe the reason no one is listening to you is you're not saying anything new. It seems like you're just attacking people for not following you blindly, though you offer no solution except "better writers," possibly yourself.

You've asked your questions more than once, Sylph. If you don't have an answer other than "my way," then let it go; you're not changing anything and you're not helping the situation or encouraging intelligent discourse about the topic, since nobody's viewpoint is apparently acceptable except your own. But if you don't care about the answers and just enjoy trolling, then you really need a new fuckin' hobby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

On a whole I'm neutral on the show. I don't love it but I don't hate it either..

Highlights

Kevin storyline- GR has been phenomenal during this storyline. I do like the fact the writers are dwelving into Kevin's past. I think this storyline has done a good job of going into depth in this storyline. we have Amber wanting to help Kevin. We see Daniel concerned for his best friend but also concerned at the fact that Amber seems too close. we have Jana worried for her husband and saddened by the connection between Kevin and Amber. Its a pleasure to see the brotherly bond between Michael and Kevin..All in all a damn good story. The only drawback for me is the chipmunk...

Adam storyline- I've been wanting Adam back on my screen so I'm glad he is. I'm curious to see where the is storyline goes. I think MAB is going a good job of creating suspense in the storyline. Is Adam faking this illness just to get out of prison or is he really going blind? There's also the question of is he gaslighting Ashley or is something or someone else behind it? I am getting the feeling they are making Adam into a dark character.

Kay storyline- I loved this storyline but it did drag too long. i am loving Kay and Murphy together though. Its good to see the rivalry with Kay and Jill resurrected. Their mother/daughter relationship will add a new dimension to the rivalry.

Rafe storyline- I am pleased to see Y&R add a gay character to the canvas. Hopefully this leads to a major storyline..

Colleen/JT/Victoria/Victor storyline- Finally JT and Victoria will be getting some angst to their marriage. I loved seeing jealous Victoria. Its good to see the writers finally do something with Colleen instead of having her being Lily's sidekick. I am too pleased about JT getting a storyline. Hopefully this leads to JT and Colleen getting close again..

Nick/Phyllis/Sharon storyline- Even though don't really care for it this is a well thought out and balanced triangle. No one is portrayed in a favorable light. Sharon and Phyllis look desperate and crazy. Nick is douche bag.

Drawbacks

Winters storyline- Ugh.. I can't stand Tyra. MAB has given this character very little character development. Add on that Eva Marcille is not the best actress and it makes a character that i want off my screen. This whole storyline was contrived. There was little thought and effort put into this. Neil acted way out of character. Plus we only saw the winters twice a moth. Ridiculous because a cheating storyline such as this is usually frontburner material...Now I'll have to see Neil, Tyra, and Ana as a happy family. <_<

Billy/Chloe/Mac storyline- I am tired of seeing drunk Billy. I'm starting to think he should be in rehab because the only time I see him is when he's drunk. Chloe is made out to look like she created the whole mess with cane for her baby which is not true since she went after Cane before she found out she was pregnant. But the writers expect viewers to forget that. Mac...I like CF as Mac. i do think she is the closest to AB's Mac but she does seem flat in most of her scenes, especially with Billy and Chloe. Their is NO chemistry between BM and CF. BM tries but it always falls short. If they wanted to revisit Billy/Mac fine but they should have cast an actress that has chemistry with BM. Likewise i see no chemistry between CF and EH. Their sparring falls flat. Personally I think EH has better sparring chemistry with CK. Its obvious they are going for a triangle with these three which sucks for me because I don't want Billy with either of these women. :(

Cane/Lily storyline- There is no substance to this couple whatsoever. They're nothing but fluff. Lately they're unbearable. Watching them coo at the dog and each other was sickening. I don't see any hotness with this couple. They're sweet but that's about it. there's no angst , conflict, or layers with them. Now they have them getting married and trying to start a family which comes off contrived to me. Actually their whole reunion was contrived. They just picked up where left off. Lily has no layers or character development. Everything with her is a plot point. She wants to model and have a baby. But viewers are given no explanation for her sudden desire to have a baby. She's a girl playing house. :rolleyes:

Noah/Eden storyline- Without a doubt the WORST teen couple Y&R has ever had. :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No disrespect, but I just fall down in laughter every time someone says that the Kay storyline (or any storyline for that matter) dragged on too long. :lol: Dear Lord, it lasted from end of October to March 2009... and I thought that, at times, it was horribly rushed. Hard to believe that, a few years ago, October to March would hardly be enough to go over the first few beats of the story! :lol: I highly doubt we would even get to Marge's death by January for example. Personally, I wouldn't have minded if it had gone on for much, much longer, but then again I've always loved the Bell slow pace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really don't want to stoke any fires, but I think some powerfully thought-provoking questions have been asked here.

I'm afraid, observing past behavior, that Vee's response is either going to be "no response" or "never mind" or "you have made up your mind" or "why bother?" or "you don't understand"

Not a lengthy answer worthy of the question.

But because I genuinely respect the rhetorical devices (we need conversation starters, and at least Sylph's questions are usually good ones, that take us a level deeper than hair, makeup, pecs and boobs, or the twist-de-jour), I'd love to hear you, Sylph, actually engage the discussion points here and formulate a detailed response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, brimike, wherefore art thou? If anyone can smooth feathers between warring factions on this board, surely, it's he (and I'm not being ironic when I say that, too).

Perhaps, I should refrain from posting any further in this thread, b/c I don't want to inflame anyone's feelings more than they have been already. Nevertheless, I do have a few, final points to make.

I, for one, don't perceive you that way, dmarex -- and please allow me to take this opportunity, on behalf of myself, at least, to apologize if I, or if anyone else, has made anybody feel that way. You are as entitled to enjoy Y&R (or any show) as I am not to (for the most part). Whether or not you enjoy any show shouldn't be a reflection of one's intelligence, I think.

Furthermore, I believe lively debate always is good for the soul. However, the problem here, I think, is that each side believes the other must "bend" to their point-of-view somehow; and when they don't, that's when the name-calling and accusations start. I'm not saying one side or post-er is "better" than the other, nor do I place myself above the fray. Unfortunately, I think several of us have taken these discussions far more seriously than we should have or needed to.

At the end of the day, a soap opera is just that. Granted, I take my soaps seriously, too, in terms of what I expect from them, quality-wise. At the same time, I have to remind myself -- especially since I made some mistakes elsewhere on the 'net and had to step back to regain lost perspective -- that what we have in common here is not world politics, or religion, but a genuine love and adoration for the same kind of entertainment.

Soaps are supposed to be entertaining, and so should any discussions about them.

Alright, ladies and gentlemen, as you were. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But he doesn't care if they provoke thought. He just wants to prove he is "Purer Than You" by asking them, and nothing you say will satisfy, because you are stupid enough to post here (just like him) and therefore not mentally equipped to engage him.

God knows I have huge issues with this board and always have - just ask the mods - but I deal with them openly. I don't try to pretend I am a brilliant social theorist on my Sam's Club throne, burning through people's supposed "lies and self-deceptions" about this board or shows they like, explaining to them that they are only "pretending to like it." As annoying and saccharine as some aspects of the board or its latest favorite people or shows can be, what's far more annoying is a self-proclaimed genius who thinks he is above it all and is sure he is the first and only to discover the problem - then has nothing else whatsoever to contribute. Sylph, I was here years ago. Your act bores me, and it was the road not taken for me.

And I'm waiting on an answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • My question was basically is Dani the only character to have a bedroom? And then the response was Jacob and Naomi ONLY have a bedroom as their set .
    • Our next installment of Love of Life 1976 Before leaving San Francisco, Cal phones her Aunt Van to set up a family gathering. Van arranges it, and upon their return, Cal and Rick announce that they are engaged. In the shocked silence that follows the announcement, Meg steps in to offer her congratulations, and also to pay for the wedding. But the family members still don’t respond happily. They fear that Rick isn’t good enough for Cal, and are surprised by Meg’s offer. Rick and Jamie visit Meg and ask whether, in light of her acceptance of his marrying her daughter, she |will drop the lawsuit. She replies that she will if he returns as her partner in Beaver Ridge. Rick reminds her that this has been settled; he can’t do that. So Meg, pretending largesse, says she’ll drop the suit, but in fact she asks her attorney to put the suit in abeyance, so it can be reopened at any time. Rick gives Cal a lovely diamond-and-sapphire engagement ring, and Betsy, who has promised to be Cal’s honor attendant, gives ‘her the dress she wore when she married Ben, saying that a bride who really is a bride should have it. Cal speaks privately to each member of the family, hoping to convince them that she and Rick are right for each other and will be happy. Jamie, after accepting Rick’s request that he be best man, checks to see if Meg has dropped the action, as promised. Finding out that it’s only in abeyance, Jamie asks if she is planning to sue her son-in-law in the future. Meg insists that she has acted on her attorney’s advice. Meg convinces Cal to give her two weeks to plans a lovely wedding, but after several days Cal discovers that Meg has done nothing in preparation. She therefore informs her mother that she and Rick will be married this weekend at the chapel. Betsy goes into labor and has her daughter by the natural-childbirth method. Cal tries to reach Ben, to tell him he’s a father, but has to be content with leaving a message. An ecstatic Ben sends flowers and a card to his wife and daughter Suzanne. Meg, in desperation at being unable to stop the wedding, has been drinking heavily. When she tells Carrie she can’t sleep and that’s why she can’t get herself together, Carrie sympathetically gives her some tranquilizers which Tom had given her. At the wedding rehearsal Meg tries once again to “reason” with Rick, but he makes it clear that he and Cal are getting married as planned. Meg then faints, upsetting Cal, who declares that her mother’s health is more important than the wedding. This gives Meg an idea. On the afternoon of the wedding, as the bride’s party waits at the chapel for Meg, she takes some of the pills, then calls Rick and tells him what she has done. When he doesn’t believe her, Meg becomes even more upset and takes more pills. When Rick informs | the wedding party of Meg’s call, they don’t believe she’d do anything that foolish, but Cal and Rick realize they can’t take the chance and go to her home. Finding her unconscious, they rush her to the hospital.Meg is treated for overdose complicated by alcohol and eventually regains consciousness.Van and Bruce offer to take Meg to their, home to recuperate, but Cal, worried because Joe raises the concern that Meg could try it again, allows her mother ‘to convince her to take her home with her. Meg is pleased with herself for having managed to come between Cal and Rick, and begs Cal not to let Rick come to the apartment, as she can’t bear to have him see her like this. Meg then works on Cal’s conscience by pitifully admitting that she loves Rick and can’t live without him. Van tries,- without success, to make Meg see that Cal and Rick are in love and can make each other happy, but Meg won’t give up and suddenly begins to have “headaches.” Even Betsy overcomes her bitterness at Meg and brings baby Suzanne to see her,trying to get Meg interested in living again. But Meg insists she can’t do anything because of her delicate | condition and has no interest in Beaver Ridge at all. .Rick has to go to New York on business and asks Cal to go with him. She replies that she can’t; she’s afraid to leave Meg. Cal, with Hank, sees Rick off at the airport, and just before he boards, he gives her a letter to read later. She reads it at home that evening; -it’s a plea from Rick to join him in New York and get married immediately. He tells her that their love and their being together are the only things that matter.Cal puts the letter in her handbag and goes to shower.Meg has seen the letter and reads it. Upset that Cal might do what Rick asks, she goes to Joe at the clinic, claiming she’s sleeping badly, and asks for sleeping pills. Joe, of course, refuses to give them to her, and, as she has hoped, he calls Cal to warn her. Cal now redoubles her efforts to keep an eye on her - mother. Meg, complaining of another headache, asks for water to take aspirin and takes four tablets from abottle, which she holds so Cal can see the label has been removed. When Cal snatches it and demandsto know what she’s taking and where she got them,Meg “confesses” that she went to a new doctor for sleeping pills because Joe wouldn’t give her any. Seeing she’s got Cal where she wants her, Meg presses Cal to promise she’ll be there as long as she needs her. Rick’s New York trip comes to nothing when he discovers the prospective backers want almost complete control of the project. Jamie suggests that Rick talk to Meg again about dropping the suit, as every cent Rick has is being tied up by this litigation. Rick insists that Meg won’t do any favors for him, and he isconvinced that her suicide attempt and subsequent emotional instability are just a scheme to tie Cal to her. But he realizes Cal won’t be able to see it this way. Rick sees only one more possibility to his financial problem: Ray Slater promised to help him if hearranged a meeting between Ray and Jamie, which Rick did. As a result of that meeting, Ray informed Ian Russell that he might be able to get Beaver Ridge for him but will require a piece of the action if it works out. Rick arrives home to find a distraught Cal, who informs him that she was warned by Joe to watch out for Meg and, sure enough, she discovered her trying to pass sleeping pills off as aspirin. But Rick insists on knowing the name of the doctor Meg got the pills from, and when he attempts to call him, Meg backs down and admits there was no doctor and no sleeping pills—the bottle contained her allergy medication. Cal is horrified that she allowed herself to be taken in again by Meg in spite of knowing firsthand what her mother is like and warnings from the entire family. Rick insists that she get away from Meg now and go visit Betsy until he gets things settled. As soon as Cal has gone, Rick insists that Meg come out of the bedroom where she has barricaded herself, and tells her he knows her too well to believe she would ever take her own life. He tells her he admires her and would like them to come out of this as friends. Meg makes it clear that friendship isn’t what she wants from him. But when Rick picks up Cal, who now wants to get married right away, and | returns to her apartment, they find a note from her “loving mother” saying she and Rick are now friends and they should call her after they are married.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • As always, really interesting to get your impressions! I was only watching sporadically during this period (whereas I was transfixed during the Marian storyline), but if I remember correctly 1996 was a pretty rough transitional year. It came at a period where P&G was playing musical chairs with its executive producers--ATWT was hit especially hard by this. The current executive producer, Michael Laibson, is out in November 1996, replaced by Paul Rauch, who stays for nearly 6 years. While Rauch has a few really bad ideas that cause long-term damage to the show, those don't really kick in until 1999, and his first couple of years are very strong. So once you get to 1997, you should see the show rebound significantly. 
    • Haha love a little drunk posting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m up to April 01, 1996. I think I’m starting to understand what many have said.. things are different. I miss the community vibe of Springfield, when you had people working at the hectic newspaper, the choatic diner, the rich were coming in for coffee, or the TV network was abuzz about the latest scandal. Things have become a little more tunneled into their own storylines. Right now, for me anyway, there isn’t a strong desire to see what happens next, ever since the Brent/Marian story ended. It was a darker, more suspenseful storyline that really got me intrigued and waiting to see what happens next, while everything else was just a nice view of midwestern families living their dramatic lives. And I love that too, when the characters and storytelling is strong, but right now, some things are a little stale. In these last 5 weeks, we had two bigger events: Nick and Susan’s wedding:  it was sweet, but I really found it weird they played music over their vows instead of being able to hear them. Then, they leave town immediately after and for good? We really didn’t get a ton of time with them - one minute Susan is in a hospital bed, post-coma, celebrating the new year, and now she’s married and gone. I’m having a hard time with the revolving door of characters since my early ’95 watch. This year we’ve lost so many characters, gained so many characters, and to what end? Henry’s funeral:  this was so sad, considering the real actor passed. I’m curious what other fans thought about the funeral. Granted, when an actor passes, you don’t have much time to plan ahead, so you need to insert it into whatever storylines are happening at the time.  But sadly, this funeral happened when everyone was hating each other. Vanessa was upset with Matt because the Amanda secret came out and he kept it from her. Quint showed up, with his very young affair no less, which made both Nola and J upset. Amanda was there which upset both Blake and Ross. Roger insisted he give a speech which upset everyone. Vanessa was mad at Quint for bringing his young girlfriend, and then Dinah was so upset about her grandfather, which was emotional, but everyone is currently at odds with Dinah. The flashbacks were effective, and the most emotional scene was Vanessa’s breakdown when reading Henry’s letter to her.  Otherwise, it was a pretty hateful funeral, which felt icky. Otherwise, my quick pros and cons currently happening… Pros: Alex and Hawk are great and funny. He gets under her skin and it’s hilarious to watch her react, but she needs him. They were in LA trying to get dirt on Amanda’s former life and Hawk was living it up with young gorgeous women and all the spending money at his disposal.  Generally, the Amanda and her secret storyline is interesting and I really like the actress. Alex vs. Amanda is entertaining. Tina came onto the scene around the time Nadine died, but she’s been given a backstory which is interesting to me now. She’s a prostitute, who means well, and is trying to take care of her daughter, Dahlia. She grew up with Frank, who has a soft spot for her. Marcus, in a new storyline he desperately needed away from Dinah and his dad, has taken a strong liking to Dahlia. She sings well and he plays saxophone well, so their music is endearing. Sadly, Tina got involved in a robbery gone-bad, where they held up a Spaulding board of directors meeting. She flees, but Frank catches her outside and is forced to arrest her, while Cleary (she’s back!) arrests the main bad guy involved and saves the Spaulding family. I’m curious to see where this one goes, but curious, was Tina actually on the show before this or is she a brand new character? Cons: The Dinah/Hart/Roger storyline is pretty stale now. I need something new. Lucy and Alan-Michael are barely on since Brent left, which is sad. You spend an entire year on a storyline that builds their relationship, brings strife and wedges, and now that they’re finally able to be together in love with no obstacles, you never show them? I want to see them happy! Oh and Lucy and Bridget/David haven't had a scene since Marian tried to get 'a room at the boarding house, which is weird because we haven't seen Bridget react to Lucy being alive. I don't even know if Lucy even lives at the boarding house or with AM, but it's sad pretending like Lucy/Bridget/David were never close friends. Reva/Josh, which is hogging airtime, is a serious whiplash. One week Josh loves her, she hates him; the next week, she loves him, he hates her. He’s always lying to Annie, but now he’s marrying her again, the second wedding in 4 months. I’m also very tired of Marah, her angst over everything, and their overwhelming concern over her. As much as I don’t like Buzz, it is funny watching Reva work at the diner, but I’ll never side with Alan so watching him have feelings about Reva/Buzz or Reva/Josh does nothing for me. Finally, the other small B storylines are only on like once a week which isn’t enough:  Gilly/Griffin/Viviane, Michelle/J, Blake/Ross/Rick, Rick/Abby, Holly/Fletcher and the baby. Something that just popped up out of the blue is David Grant leaving Springfield out of nowhere. He professed his love to Bridget, who turned him down, so he decides to leave when Griffin gives him a job opportunity. Sadly, another character written out for many new characters being introduced. Makes me wonder who is making these calls - the producers, the network, the writers, the fans?
    • OH. The AMC/OLTL Crossover with helicopter, down in the woods, 2 very pregnant, both give birth, only one baby lives. We are on the same page!!!
    • Backtracking because BTG has been distracting me from keeping up with GH. Why is Carly always involved with a paternity lie? Lulu is Dante's (wife? if Im correct) so she has the right to tell him about his son. If anything, she's in a better place to reveal paternity drama than Robin was. As for Robin...I'm conflicted about whether it was HER place to tell AJ he was Michael's dad. Being with a man who's pretending to be someone else's baby daddy is wild. Dante was snoring blaming everyone  but Rocco, however he was right about Jason. A convo isn't enough, neither is trying to be your son's friend. Adolescents need a disciplinarian. At least Lulu made Rocco and Danny scrub the house. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy