Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Absolutely. She needs to WIN. And I fully believe she can and WILL. It would mark a change for the better in the entire world. And eliminate the chance of a menace that is looming above us all. An orange clown-of-a-menace. So, Canada, Germany, anywhere else - we are here to support the USA. Our countries and lives depend on this. 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3460

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

If I were in Donald Trump's position, and I had the sense God gave a dung beetle, I would be thinking up a possible exit strategy.  If not for myself, then definitely for my running mate, who's becoming more and more of a liability to my campaign every day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Like I said before, I'm sure the media will find some skeleton in Tim Walz's closet.  (They already have with the past DUI arrest, but that doesn't seem to be "sticking" thus far).  But, short of learning he once killed a man*, or groped a bunch of cheerleaders at a pep rally, I think - or at least I hope - voters will stick with him, and with Kamala Harris, because what he has done to turn the tide in this election in such a short period of time is remarkable.

(*And even if that happens, I'll be the first to say, "So, the gun went off.")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The right wing angle so far has been him 'abandoning' his 20+(?) year military career to go into politics and/or abstain from the Iraq War, which really isn't true. They can't swiftboat him. It's not gonna work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But you know how the GOP (and the media, who's pretty much in the tank for the GOP) operates.  Sooner or later, they'll dig up some anguished woman with a tale about how Walz either raped her or tried to rape her years ago at some sketchy airport motel in Nebraska.  I mean, there's always a Donna Rice (or Fawne Hall, or Gennifer Flowers, or Monica Lewinsky, or Kathleen Willey, or Rielle Hunter, or Leeann Tweeden, or Tara Reade, or...) always nibbling around somewhere.  (And yes, I know that's not the thing to say in post-#MeToo America, where we are supposed to believe the victim no matter what, but...).

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I mean, they never found anything with women on Obama and nothing like that ever stuck to Joe for long either. I feel like our just coming up with a random sex angle out of nowhere is borrowing trouble, lol. And I don't trust the Trump Gang to walk out of the bathroom without stepping on a rake right now. But who knows!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But they DID find the guy who (allegedly) carried on a years-long love affair with Barack.  It's just that Donald Trump managed to distract them all with his birtherism nonsense.  Otherwise, that might have been the thing to torpedo his entire campaign, true or not.

I realize I'm borrowing trouble here, but you have to understand: I might have been still in elementary school when it happened, but I still remember the whole Gary Hart/Donna Rice/Fawne Hall mess, as well as the impact it had not just on Hart's bid for the nomination, but on political reporting thereafter.  That scandal really was the start (in this age, at least) of the media's digging into candidates' lives and finding the juiciest, most salacious stories they could in order to sell newspapers and such; and, if possible, make it harder for one side or the other (but usually the Democrats) to win.

Am I being too cynical?  Probably.  Nevertheless, I'm bracing myself for the possibility of learning that Walz is a serial pedophile who used the gay/lesbian student alliance he co-founded at Mankato West High as a means of grooming underaged boys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL!! 

I'm just saying: the media will find something wrong with Walz - I mean, REALLY wrong - and Democrats being Democrats, we'll force him out (even though what he (allegedly) did likely won't be anywhere near as bad as everything Trump did in 1982 alone); and sure, we'll lose the election, but at least we'll feel good about ourselves, knowing that we've once again scored a gold medal in the Purity Olympics.  RME.

Meanwhile, is this good or bad?  I honestly can't tell:

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4814178-cori-bush-missouri-squad/

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I imagine the GOP will makes these types of insinuations, but they will do that with anyone who supports equality. The alternative is for Democrats to go back to reminding us how anti-gay they are.

I agree with you the GOP is going to come up with a smear. They had incredibly vile smears against Biden, including claims that he abused his daughter. I don't think they ever reached the public in any meaningful way (just as the Tara Reade claims never did), but they probably still see it as a win and are plotting for more.

Beyond the usual I remember some people who took issue with some claims she made about her bio - I think she may have claimed she caught a baby and saved it from death...and she also claimed to be a faith healer who laid hands on a child, causing him to be able to walk, and laid hands on another person, causing their tumors to shrink.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It isn't so much the GOP I would be concerned about in this situation, but all the purity-seeking, holier-than-thou types on the left and far-left who are too self-righteous to see when they're playing right into the enemy's hands. 

I'll never forget OR forgive Kirsten Gillibrand and her lot for forcing Al Franken, the only Democrat who wasn't phased at all by Trumpism early on, to leave the Senate without so much as an official investigation (which would have, IMO, exposed Leeann Tweeden's real motives in coming forward).  Next to how the Democratic Party treated Joe Biden at the end, that was the wrongest thing I'd ever seen my party do.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recent Posts

    • Angry Dante was hot; sorry, but I'm not going to pretend it wasn't awesome seeing Dominic Zamprogna act his ass off in a way that was not crying.
    • Thanks, interesting and so believable (no Lonatrat or Clones...)Instead of the Lewis family he should have made the Oil family Granger...even if the audience didn't remember that one off character it would have been interesting to tie it into the fictional GL world.
    • Dante needs stick removed from his butt
    • When you bring up what I like to call "Shapiro's Folly" you think Dano's acting choices mattered? I ask because I don't think so. As far as I could tell almost universally the ABC fans hated the very idea of her being on all 4 shows! And, BTW, the headwriters also hated it, at least according to comments made by Passanante. But, it is not hard to imagine that they'd feel that way. And, I agreed. If she wanted success she should have planted "Rae" on one & given up her idea of branding, or whatever it was that she was after.  
    • Okay, well her reasons were that she had a mandate to reduce the size of the cast & she had another mandate to make the cast overall younger, so her reason for picking Donna to off was because she was too old.  So, is that what you understand? Or are you thinking of something else? Which if so, I would be delighted to hear about it!  She had arbitrarily picked 50 as the age people needed to be younger than.  And, that is why she got rid of both Bridget & Spencer Harrison.  And, getting rid of Bridget was another of her horrible ideas.  Why do you refer to her as the Face of the Show? Don't feel bad. I am a major Cass fan & I don't remember him with Donna either, LOL! Can we say forgettable? And, yes, Lila was the most last minute of last minutes!!!! 
    • This is AWESOME, thank you for taking the time to post this! My first thought: My memory is a lot better than I thought it was, LOL! The first episode I clearly remember watching had a scene of Ed confronting Holly about Christina's paternity. He lamented how wonderful things had been over Christmas, so looks like I started watching the show early 1976. The only thing puzzling me is where is Evie? I thought she was around BEFORE Rita got involved with Tim, but maybe that's one gap in my memory. It makes Rita look slightly better--in that case, she didn't seduce Tim knowing her sister had a crush on him.
    • Oh, well.  At least he can cry into his hoodie.
    • Sorry, just realized I'd somehow lost a whole paragraph in that last post.
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  They should have brought Billy back in the early '90s for more drama with Hart and Blake. Maybe Blake would have gotten involved with him to try to ruin him in Roger's eyes, but realize under his sweet nature, Billy was a player himself.
    • Checked. Taggert last date, Wed, 7-19-23, so a long dadgummed time ago.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy