Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5990

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3462

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I’m all for reckoning and wrestling with the past, but I think policing these ancient curios are a waste of energy. In cases like GWTW, they are snapshots in time that can be learned from and contextualized in a way that is useful in our digital culture, which decontextualized everything (but with DofH, you’re right: very few people were even thinking about that show before this controversy). How do we make the culture more inclusive moving forward? 

Edited by Faulkner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That just lets me know that they are scared of change and the fact that their 'leader' has messed up so much there is very little chance of re-election.

probably in the South.

Please register in order to view this content

  That said...I agree with the shelving more than anything. It is a sign of its time more than it is purposely trying to offend people. A lot of people have fun memories of that show so best to leave it be IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd forgotten that. I'm not in favor of any kind of cultural purge. I do think some of this stuff should not be on the airwaves or streaming. If people want to buy the DVD's and watch them without bothering the rest of us, fine.  When people try to cancel JK Rowling (who I don't give one damn about as a writer) I cringe a bit. If you don't want to buy her books fine, but if we can't read or watch anything made by people who aren't fully "woke", the pickings are going to be slim indeed. I feel more fortunate then ever that Bernie was not the nominee because people on the far left really do seem to want to take it that far.

 

I'm all for getting rid of these Confederate statues and renaming the military bases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Do any channels even currently air reruns of the Dukes? A search of my cable provider shows they don't.

 

I agree with that, as I was a little kid when it was originally on. Even as an adult, I enjoyed it because it was just plain FUN, which you can't say about a lot of shows on now. The late 70s through the late 80s had a lot of fun action/adventure programs. My mom also bought a General Lee Matchbox car for me back in the day, when no one thought twice about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Same. As a kid, I never knew any of the subtext. It was fun action/adventure to me as well. Color me surprised much much much later. And even then I'm not sure how to feel about what I felt was a kid show. I mean did the creator know, was it just the good ole boy theme back then with no bad sign, I don't know. 

 

As for does any channel still does...well...I want to say I've seen it on one of my channels in passing on the guide once on a old school tv shows (they have HEAD OF THE CLASS, FACTS OF LIFE, NIGHT COURT, all kinds of shows from as far back as the 60s and 70s I believe), but I want to say it was late night. It is next to a channel called ESCAPE here that aired thriller/suspense/crime tv shows (some even from Canada) and SCANDAL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

LOL! I have to admit it's finally good to see the media finally forced to ask some questions about his health. It's ironic that after forcing all these students to risk their health just for an ego boost ended up making him look weak and sickly. I still think there's only a 50/50 chance he make it to November.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Holy [!@#$%^&*]. I figured at best that would be a 5-4 with Roberts narrowly ruling for certain protections to try to keep things from going too far in one direction. I know some people are choking right now as they invested so much time and $$$$$$$ in these elections and in getting far right activists onto the benches.

 

All I can humbly say to them is - eat [!@#$%^&*] and choke on it, you ugly, worthless hatemongers. 

 

The BEST part of this is that Neal Gorsuch, who wrote the opinion, was a Trump pick! Anti-lgbt hate groups spent so much time and money and this is what they got for it!

 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

A Twitter account I follow by someone who was former GOP now independent says that this decision is really going to demoralize Trump's evangelical supporters. He says that hating the gays is even more important to the evangelicals than abortion which, I gotta say, surprised me a little until you realize that evangelicals like to talk a good game about abortion until one of them needs one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

That's interesting. I would have had the same thought too (about abortion being most important to them). I hope it does demoralize them, even if they will have their share of wins - this was, or should have been, one of their biggest, after all the decades they've spent getting to this point.

 

With Anthony Kennedy, these groups would always blame his clerks and claim they had somehow corrupted him. So I guess we may get more of that type of paranoia popping up again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • It sure was!  With respect, how does that make sense?  These men are young, I don't see that. 
    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
    • Unpopular opinion:  The focus on the soap opera tropes over the mysteries and crimes was partly what did the show in.  Also, featuring characters not involved in the legal, police, and criminal elements also hurt the show and took away what made it unique. Featuring characters like Jody, Raven, Sky, etc hurt the show long term.  The show ABCified starting in 1976/1977 and then went through a youthification period starting in 1981.  
    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy