Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members


no. you hit it right on the head. not out of touch in the slightest. many of us just keep our heads buried in the sand until things affect us. but many more were just sick and tired of what happened. it's a great start, and in a way, I'm glad we didn't take over the senate.....because many would have rested on their laurels and not did the hard work that begins anew this morning.


now, today, Democrats need to start looking for more Dems like O'Roerke for two years from now. Rafael will get into some serious trouble here soon, and if Repubs think they will act more Trump-like in the Senate....look at the House and see where that got them.

as for McCaskill here in Missouri.....she deserved to lose. people, democrat voting people, hate her guts here. and her making that statement on FN might have sunk her chances, even though she was picked to lose this seat anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3458

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Democrats taking the House means that ACA repeal is off the table and that is extremely good. Moving forward into 2020 the good news is that Democrats performed well in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin which are states they need to win to take the electoral college.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Beto did a great job and it showed democrats can be competitive as did Gillum in Fl and Abrams in Ga. My biggest complaint with both is the laziness of the party. Dems need to come in a build the ground game in both states.  And they better start now.

 

What is the deal with McCaskill. My brother who lives in St. Louis area has been down on McCaskill but he as a republican said he would reluctantly vote for her.(He voted Kander in 2016 also). I am a huge Jason Kander fan and was hoping he might run for state office there again or try again for the senate. I know his PTSD issues forced him out of the mayoral race in KC. But why is McCaskill so hated?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

IA.  Being the "anti-Trump party" got them this far.  However, if the Democratic Party wants to cement last night's victories and move forward, they need to begin work now on rebuilding "from the ground up," with fresh faces and voices, and truly progressive ideas on how to heal the economic and other wounds that continue to fester throughout this country.  Last night and the run-up to it were just the start; now, the real work must begin.

 

 

Yes. It. Is.  The ACA ain't perfect, but dammit, it's better than what we had before, which was (old joke, I know) a package of band-aids and that bottle of Robitussin that your mama kept even when y'all moved thirty years ago.

 

 

I think that has to be the unkindest cut of all for Trump.

 

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think healthcare is a good starting point but they need a policy to agree on. The bipartisan popularity of Medicaid expansion shows that ALL Americans want affordable healthcare and perhaps even governmental control.  It's now been voted to move forward in states like Idaho, Utah, and Nebraska.

 

Impartial redistricting is also popular and bipartisan. I know it's a hornets nest in some areas for democrats. I'm wasn't keen on seeing a republican control redistricting in Illinois and thank goodness that won't happen, But I also hate the idea of our own state gerrymandered for democrats. But I want to see a few more republican states move this forward also. It won on the ballot in Michigan last night.

 

Legalizing marijuana. Get with it. Most Americans want this. And it can be packaged as part of criminal justice reform/

 

Money out of politics. Beto lost but look what he did for fundraising. (his race also propelled downballot democrats to victory in Texas).

 

AND TAXCUTS for the middle class, while restoring the tax breaks the 1% got. That is not unpopular with anyone other than the 1%

 

I think they should build their platform on all the things Trump promised that sounded good - better healthcare, protecting social security, medicare, Medicaid, infrastructure, and push these issues.

 

And get a decent bipartisan immigration plan passed that includes strong border security with NO WALL. I mean seriously there has to be one democrat who can sell this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members


well, her and her husband are very very rich, which doesn't bode well for a state which runs Republican from rural areas. also, she voted to protect payday loan businesses and has received money from the lobbyists here in Mo. to do just that. the reason why she didn't lose the last two times was that a Republican (like Todd Akin) said something so foul that she ended up keeping her seat, being the lesser of two evils. I think people have had enough of her here....and her getting on FN and backing Trump with the caravan this past weekend may have sealed her fate, on top of not coming back to the state or our city of St. Louis (where I live and was born and raised) until election time rubbed people in KC and here the wrong way. that was where the majority of her votes came from, and she garnered enough of the rural vote to stay in.

she changed. she was not the person I voted for for Gov. or her first Senate victory. she fell in line with Republicans for the most part and lost this state along the way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks I knew about the payday stuff but I have been disconnected from the MSM and press for the past couple of weeks intentionally for the most part. I didn't know about this caravan  BS from her. Yeah she deserved to go. 

 

Democrats or activists I should say have gone the smart route in some cases with Minimum Wage increases and Medicaid expansion. I see both Arkansas and Missouri voted for min wage increases yesterday. And Missouri legalizing medical marijuana use and Michigan recreational use.  There are plenty of issues democrats can run with or insert into their platform to be universally popular. And have any state public servants in 
 legislature   talked about expanding Medicaid? Mo chose not to - seems like a popular issue even in red states.

Edited by JaneAusten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for posting . Lord the damn whining from some progressives is pathetic. Beto for example lost yes but his running helped some important downballot wins. Gillum lost, but Florida restored voting rights to 1.4 million felons. The list goes on.  And this

 

 

Edited by JaneAusten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^ Yes, I do relish getting rid of some of the worst ones. I also celebrate some of the firsts, even though I don't agree with all of their positions. There were some real victories last night. I was seriously worried that the elections would be hacked, so in the big picture it's a relief to me that doesn't seem to have happened.

 

I remember as a child my mother telling me that felons lost their right to vote with the implication that this was the way it was and the way it should be. It's not something I questioned much until the last few years.  I didn't realize it was rooted in Jim Crow either. Anyway, I'm glad Florida restored people's votes because it seems to me that once people do their time they should have their rights back.

 

Closer to home, I'm thrilled and amazed that Kara Eastman came within three points of Don Bacon.  Carl, this tells me that you were right and a more progressive candidate can motivate people to come out, more than trying to play to the center.  Plus Nebraskans voted to expand Medicaid for all, which I did not expect to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jon Ralston explained this. Most republicans would have had to really stretch for vote for him when he was still alive and likely would not have but since he's dead, they know that a republican will be appointed in his place. That was the strategy I guess that was used in Nevada by the state GOP to get GOP voters to vote for for the dead pimp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes. Me too. It's sickening. Plus blatant cheaters still win and there is so much corruption.  One thing about 2018 is you can't hide the dirt as well anymore.  We could all see these cheaters and their voter suppression tactics in real time.  Hopefully, the people with power can do something about that in 2020.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes, I am familiar with Fred Silverman. Agree, the 90 minute AW a very poor decision by Silverman. I think Silverman was behind the decision to go with Texas.
    • Thanks -- you're doing God's work The Gio reveal was everything I hoped for and more. GH got it right. Head to toe, GM is a stunning physical specimen.
    • I really wonder how they'll handle Netflix's usual long breaks between seasons. That girl is going to grow up fast... makes me wonder if this wouldn't have been a better fit for HBO Max considering they're leaning into a more broadcast style of production model with The Pitt.
    • I agree -- I didn't suspect Ted, either. I think a lot of people are giving themselves way too much credit in predicting Ted's problems

      Please register in order to view this content

      And can I have a different take on Ted here? Yes, he's made a huge mistake with this Leslie debacle, and yes, he has to suffer and pay for it. But does that make Ted a terrible human being? I don't think it does. He made a horrific mistake over 2 decades ago, and as far as we know, he's been a good husband and father since. As far as we know, he hasn't strayed or violated his marriage since. He didn't know that he fathered another child, and thought he "removed" Leslie from his life. I won't blame Nicole if she doesn't forgive him, but I also won't blame her if she decides what they have and what they've had more than makes up for what he did. Ted is getting dragged far more than Bill is on these boards, and I think Bill is MUCH worse as a husband and father. How many times did he cheat on Dani during their marriage? How many times did he do vile things in his role as fixer? How much did he hurt his daughters by screwing their friend and marrying her? With Keith Robinson coming in as Ted, maybe we'll see a character change in direction and we'll discover that Ted has many flaws and always had a dark side. For now, though, I'm inclined to both be angry with Ted for hurting his family while also sympathizing with him. I know what you mean, but I do think that was intentional. So much was going on in that episode, and I think they decided not to let Nicole's reaction be lost in all that. Nicole will get those scenes that you're asking for.  
    • That was the original point of me sending you her 6 airdates, so now with those, and the link to the daily episode guide I've provided, that should help you more easily find the additional Ruth Buzzi scenes. I will always repeat myself when it comes to defending my data that I've taken decades to research and compile. But, as you pointed out in a recent post, I am kind, so at least I will do it with you in a kind way as opposed to the usual social media way most people do with just getting rude/nasty. That's not my style, as you correctly pointed out earlier this week, and never will be.  So, all is well! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy