Jump to content

Knots Landing


Sedrick

Recommended Posts

  • Members

For 20 years I was convinced that it was Teri Austin playing Sally's Friend on the phone.  It wasn't until I read an interview with Lar Park Lincoln on a Knots website that I found out that it was Lar.  I never would have guessed that.  I also never understood why they wasted an actess of Lynne Moody's caliber and gave her little to no story during her last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

If they were going to go there with Gary a part of me wishes it had been with Olivia, to show how far gone he was without Val and to make viewers question whether or not Olivia was genuine or scheming. And when Val returned, she would have been repulsed.

There was so much they could have done and should have done with Pat. Maybe I should be surprised lily-white Knots even brought Frank and Pat in.

I don't mind Frank just being friends with Val. They had a nice bond and anything that meant less Karen/Val was good for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't remember who said it (most likely JamesFromLondon from Telly Talk), but Season 14 is the year where Gary, Karen, and Mack's second winds wear off. They're not as rich as they used to be. They're not as skillful as they used to be. And they're not as young as they used to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For some reason, I can't see Peter Dunne or even David Paulsen doing what amounted to a Lifetime Original Movie-esque storyline for Jill.  Dunne, in particular, seemed above doing cheap, exploitative stories where one woman goes psycho because she's lost her man to another woman.  But I definitely agree that they would've played the fallout more than the Lechowicks did.

I've always looked at that as KNOTS recognizing that the '80's and all their excesses were over, and that their characters, like much of the country, had to readjust to the scaled-down, more down-to-earth '90's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

That's certainly true for DYNASTY, lol.  In rewatching the final season, I noticed that reduced budgets and changing times kinda forced David Paulsen and his team to try and dig deeper into the characters, but the problem was that DYNASTY's characters had become so one-dimensional, and the general acting style had become SO stylized, that even attempting to bring some substance into a show that had become so damaged after several years of bad or no storytelling was just impossible.  If DYNASTY really wanted to last into the '90's, then it needed to be gutted and revamped.

Similarly, if KL had any chance at all of lasting beyond 1993 - which I don't think was possible even under the best circumstances - then it needed to redefine itself for the new decade.  It needed to get away from the "big business" storylines that had defined the Lechowicks' era, and maybe even needed to do away with characters like Gary and Greg as well.  It needed to get more personal, and possibly bring more of a procedural element into the storytelling, such as having a major character work as a cop or doctor at a local hospital.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The story of Gary and Val was done by the end. I like your ideas - I would have rebuilt the show around the Mackenzies and a new set of neighbors. David Jacobs was considering that (plus the Ewings, which I think would have been a mistake) but didn’t pursue it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dynasty dated itself so quickly with all that style. At one point there were actual, complex issues between Alexis, Blake, and their children. But that goes away and it’s all women quickly walking towards an exit, turning while putting on a fur, and throwing down some drag queen level shade at the other people in the room before actually leaving. Later era Dynasty, Thirtysomthing and China Beach airing at the same time on the same network (IIRC all ABC) is so fascinating. The culture switches to introspection for that generation as storytelling so decisively and with that a move away from high style.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I agree.  Brandon Stoddard, who ran ABC throughout the latter part of the '80's, was responsible for that move away from the sort of glossy programming that had defined the network in the '70's and early '80's, largely because he saw how NBC had become #1 by focusing more on shows that had more substance than ABC's.  Plus, as much as some folks say they prefer their entertainment to be more escapist, I think it's hard to lose oneself in a frothy little show like DYNASTY, when so many people you know and care about are dying of a disease (like AIDS) that their own government refuses even to acknowledge, let alone find a remedy for.  (Sound familiar, ladies and gents, lol?)

The thing is, DYNASTY was a more complex show in its' first season, but were the Shapiros up to the challenge of writing that kind of show?  Honestly, I have my doubts.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Brandon Stoddard goal was to get Aaron Spelling hit factory off ABC and Robert Iger was the one who did so.

Primetime soaps peaked Fall 1982-Spring 1985 then tanked Fall 1985 and were creatively exhausted by Spring 1988.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've read that John Forsythe refused to play any storyline where Blake would cheat or be seen in a negative light so that storlines would need to cater to those demands. Were there any such limitations on KL? Did any of the cast refuse to do certain things? I can only imagine a handful of them had the power to have such demands. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mack was supposed to cheap on Karen with Anne during her first run but Michele Lee put a stop to it and Anne was written off. Other than that, the only thing I can think is Donna Mills changing the baby story which had her kidnapping the babies.

Something that always makes me chuckle is Joan Van Ark's dislike of Lynn Latham and Bernie Lechowick turning Val into "the village idiot." She mentioned wanting to talk to them but they did not allow any communication with the cast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In a way, Mack cheating on Karen would've been too predictable.  On the other hand, circumstances forcing Karen to cheat on Mack...?  Now, that, I think, would've been interesting!

Gary and Anne were supposed to have an affair during Val's "brain virus" storyline, but Michelle Phillips went to Co-EP Lawrence Kasha and asked him to nix it, saying Anne can't be someone who just goes from man to man.  As Tommy Krasker points out in his blog, however, Anne Matheson WAS the type who'd go from man to man.  After all, she once was a spoiled heiress who was desperate not to end up poor (or worse, middle class).  That's why I wanted them to bring back John Pleshette at some point and have Richard and Anne end up together, but that's a different fanfic, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember a Donna Mills interview where she said that Abby becoming a kidnapper would make her irredeemable to the audience. There's also the conflict of Abby being a kidnapper when her own children were once kidnapped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/composer-leonard-bernstein-s-children-request-his-music-be-played-in-the-kennedy-center-in-rebuke-to-trump
    • And, to me it is a little bit hilarious that AW fans all over continue to refer to it as Egyptian Dust Recently elsewhere I've been running polls. When did you stop watching AW or What storyline caused you to stop watching AW. You may be interested to know that sticking it out till the bitter end is winning by a landslide. Next highest vote getter is - no surprise - Frankie's murder. So that covers like 60% & next 20%. Then the votes drop way down to 10% and well below but a wide array of reasons are given, including but not limited to  Justine Lumina Rachel having twins at her age, how ridiculous Mac's death the 90 minute show firing JC, George R & Dwyer Hmm, I know there are a few more, in the 1%-3% range but I cannot think of what they are. Sorry, my bad. Should have made notes but I didn't know I would be posting about it. LOL!!  
    • A kind angel has added both episodes to the vault (UK Diva TV broadcast version). 
    • Yes, I think that is the most likely situation.  TPTB were unhappy with the offer(s) they got from the tourism board in Finland, and decided the trip was going to be too expensive for P&G/NBC to finance alone.   I would also speculate a similar situation likely occurred a few years later with the planned location shoot in Egypt, which was also cancelled after the storyline had already started, and changed to Arizona.  
    • What else? #May4th

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • In my usual account on my most used video hosting site with the video title  DAYS 1-8-15 Will & Paul Sex This is an edit I began when I was first teaching myself to edit & at that time I couldn't make it do what I wanted it to do. I pulled it up & finished it this morning. 
    • Or Megan is shot as retaliation for Dave's unpaid gambling debts...while Julie confesses she's the biological mother of Special Guest Star Barry Bostwick's little boy.
    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy