Jump to content

Knots Landing


Sedrick

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I was trying to remember if it was Sam Behrens (Danny Waleska) or Doug Sheehan (Ben Gibson) who gave a stinging exit interview to TV Guide when his character was written off of Knots.

I know it was an ex-GH actor.  He basically said that there was no room for a new male character because the women were the focus of the show and the existing male actors were unwelcoming.  It all came off as very bitter, despite the fact that both characters were the center of a lot of drama.  But, since we rarely saw either actor after their time on the show, I cannot recall which one said it.

I think of it as a real "don't bite the hand that feeds you"-type of lesson.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Eh - hard to shed a lot of tears for him when there were so many other male-oriented shows (including soaps such as Dallas).

Doug Sheehan had a four year run on the show - that’s pretty good for someone who is essentially coming between the one of the main couples on the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is hard for me to hear "This is a female-oriented" show and think this is supposed to be a critic.
I realize the bitterness is speaking but it is a good thing that KL was centered around its female characters when all was said and done.
Sheehan had a good run but I do remember he wasn't happy and I think he asked to be written out so I think it is possible he was frustrated and unhappy there.
There'd be no way Behrens would have been surprised and bitter to be written out considering what his character was. He was a guest star for a season, nothing more. He'd have to have been deluded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't blame Doug Sheehan for feeling bitter and unhappy and wanting out.  Everyone BTS was so sold on Gary and Val being endgame that they made Ben look like a damn fool in the process.

The thing is, most TV series are supposed to be targeted toward women, as advertisers still consider women - and women 18-35 in particular - to be the biggest consumers and the most willing to try the newest products on the market.  If you're a male actor going to work on a TV series, you know that; and if you don't, you should.

Agree.  Besides, Sam Behrens might be a great guy IRL, but on-camera, he's always been dull and devoid of chemistry with anyone, male or female.  Even if Danny hadn't turned out to be a total psychopath, they would've been forced to write him off, as there was simply nowhere they could have gone with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members


Granted I am not an artist so I don't know the feeling of wanting to walk away from a good-paying job because you want to "be challenged" but this feels like cutting off your nose to spite your face.
While everyone understood Gary was the endgame, by the time Sheehan chose to walk away Val and Ben were going very well, were very solid and were surprisingly popular considering, well, that they weren't the endgame. They weren't putting Gary and Val back together anytime soon.
There was a LOT of story yet to be told with the character, even from within the confines of the Val triangle, let alone if they managed to use him in other directions which they might have!

His exit story, which wouldn't have happened if he hadn't asked to leave, was ironically the only really garbage "we-don't-know-what-to-do-with-you" story he really was given.
He was paid very well to play a character on a high-rated primetime show. I can't possibly understand what would have creatively bothered him so much that he would want to walk away from the job when there was no sign the character had exhausted its potential IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Gary and Val took a long time to reunite because she and Ben were popular together.  I remember my parents saying Val was too good for Gary..and that she had more in common with Ben.  Both were writers, both jogged,  both loved the ocean, and both had a quirky sense of whimsy.

I actually liked him with Abby better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's what I am saying. I think a LOT of people felt that way and it is a testament to the talent of everyone involved - actors and writers.
There was a lot more story that could be told - the dilemna between the man who is right for you and the passion that is toxic but that you can't get out of your skin - especially with the twins still hanging over them.
They didn't reunite Gary and Val properly until much later so besides ego I don't see why Sheehan should have cared that Gary/Val would be the end game. The end game was a long ways away!


I actually found a piece that I think might bw what is mentioned above from People in 1985 and not only does he come off as something of an a** to me here, but he confirms that
1) it is about ego ("Second-fiddle"? Dude was given plenty of material; he wasn't going to get top billing over the OG)
2) it is amazing when you think he was still ON THE SHOW and was a year away from leaving when he was saying those things 

https://people.com/archive/tired-of-playing-second-fiddle-on-knots-landing-doug-sheehan-starts-tooting-his-own-horn-vol-24-no-22/

So I would have to imagine it didn't make him very popular on-set either.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you, I was searching the TV Guide archives and it was driving me nuts. 

Actor's egos are something to behold.  The guy not only successfully moved from daytime to primetime, while still at a viable age, but also had a fragrance contract with Este Lauder/Aramis, and messes it up by whining about being the third wheel. Ben had potential to be paired with multiple other people after Val, and his role as a muckraking journalist could have easily played into future stories with Greg.

He had some further success with sitcoms, but, according to IMDB, he hasn't worked for the past 20 years.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He sounds terribly misguided. There’s nothing employers love more than their employees complaining publicly about their jobs. And we’re not talking about someone who was drop-dead handsome or had charisma to spare or was the second coming of Olivier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When you consider how late he joined the show, Doug Sheehan got really good screen time until he left.I also actually loved his exit espionage storyline. I know the writers tried to bring him back later, but said he wouldn’t even respond to the request. This explains why lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In a weird way it really worked for me and for Knots Landing's appeal to me that I was not sexually attracted to any of its multiple male leads over the years - and trust me, I am usually super easy taste-wise.

I am not going to bash anyone and I saw the charisma in many but Gary, Greg, Mack, Ben, Larry, Richard, Sid, Nick...
I mean there are a few supporting characters I would have - Karen's sons - but very very very few were classically handsome.
None of them really were TV-show good-looking. It helped ground the show very much IMO and I am pretty sure it is part of KL as a female-centered show.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy