Jump to content

Emmerdale: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Which scenes have had him as homophobic recently?

All of the '80s content I've seen doesn't seem far off what you could watch on television today (just more thoughtful and better written and acted). I think only some of the '70s episodes have that marked difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the pace is slower than you'd get now, both when it comes to storylines and how the episodes play out. Nowadays you get quicker cuts, more scenes, more characters in every episode compared to how it was, even during the 80s. I do agree though that the difference is even more noticeable when you look at episodes from the 70s. But back then it felt like you actually watched people living their lives, now you watch characters playing out their storylines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, absolutely 100% watch the Farm era lol no disrespect to j swift, but I don’t think I’ve ever heard anyone dismiss the early years like that. It’s slow-moving soap and super mundane - one of the early storylines focuses on a road running through the farm - but it’s very filling, if that makes sense. Not much “happens,” but you will easily get pulled into that village over the course of maybe the first five episodes.

Unfortunately, it’s literally just the first 20. The following episodes may or may not be on YT at the moment - it feels like they pop up and disappear a lot.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If the first 20 are just up like that, I'm willing to bet the rest will turn up commercially as well. It wouldn't shock me if Kanopy, the free nationwide public library streaming service, got them (though I haven't looked) as they did with Bill Gunn's wonderful avant-garde soap Personal Problems, which I think only went out to PBS affiliates in the early '80s (and then migrated to local radio).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • Members

I've not been paying that much attention to Emmerdale recently, but apparently they just had a major "twist".... it turns out that Caleb, the never-before-heard-of half-brother to Cain and Chas is the long-lost illegitimate son to Frank Tate. And now he's here to claim what he sees is his birthright: Home Farm. 

*sigh*

I guess one should be happy that they're using the show's history (in a way) but this "twist" just feels tired and uninspired. I have a hard time picturing the Frank Tate I knew giving Faith Dingle the time of day. Sure, he had a drinking problem, so I guess something might have happened if he was drunk out of his mind... But that doesn't explain why Caleb would see Home Farm as his birthright. Frank only owned it for about 9 years, and it has had several owners since then. It's just a flimsy excuse to pit him against Kim.

It would have made a little more sense, and used even more Emmerdale history, if Caleb had been a product of an affair between Faith and Gerald Verney. The Verney's owned Home Farm (or Miffield Hall as it was known back then) for centuries. They lost it when Gerald had to sell up after the death of his uncle George, the last Verney who lived at Miffield Hall back when the show began in 1972. That would have made his claim about "birthright" seem a little more plausible. But I seriously doubt that many people involved in Emmerdale today even know this piece of history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I believe Henry Slesar intended that the Paige/Nola plot would play out over three to six months and Paige would be the new younger ingenue; but a few things happened. Sharon Gabet didn't renew her contract and the audience didn't like the Paige/Brian romance as it flirted with incest. Kim Hunter revealed in an interview that she as slated for 3 months but Henry asked her to stay on for an additional period
    • Bill and the performer are the strongest male character and actor on this show.  Yeah, how I see it too. you pair your best young female with one of the weakest screams sabotage to me. 
    • Nordstrom's page for above AFRM Shailine dress that Chelsea wore, pink petal pattern/color https://www.nordstrom.com/s/shailene-print-long-sleeve-powermesh-midi-dress/8127521?origin=category-personalizedsort&color=683 Notice on that page there is a video, and the video shows a different color which is the color worn by Audra on Y&R in April 2025. Same exact dress, just different color pattern - organic rose. https://wornontv.net/509377/
    • I sometimes wonder if he’s even breathing.
    • I hit the Google Machine, and can't find Alex Alegria's (Tomas) age anywhere. Wow, I really disagree with this. I like that Bill plays against the typical bad guy. I think Maurice Johnson has been just fine -- except for that swaying. I cannot believe someone -- anyone -- on that set didn't give him a note. He should have been called out on that in week one. The swaying and swiveling never stops unless he sits down. I understand the need for product placement and the reason for it. However, it does feel wrong during emotional scenes. Yes, we're talking about the products, but it takes us out of those emotional moments, and GATES shouldn't be happy about that. They need to do better. Maxim said it better than I did. I agree. The writers have absolutely failed Ashley and Derek. I've abused both of them here, but I do place more of the blame on the writing. Compare what A & D have been given with the dialogue Ambyr Michelle is getting as Eva. We're not even in the same universe. Ambyr is getting writing that plays to her (many) strengths. She takes good dialogue and knocks it out of the park. Ashley and Derek are given garbage to play and garbage to say.  
    • The Eva / Tomas scenes at the end -- to see a good actress having to play a scene with someone giving her less than nothing -- that was painful.
    • I thought the story had it’s moments, I much preferred the story once Greg was meddling, trying to keep her away from Tom Ryan. I loved them together!   And there was a story they could have developed from this. Laura stopped having a lot of scenes with the ensemble. She's the only one missing during the big finales of seasons 5&6, and I would have been cool to play on that! For one, Laura being a more cutthroat business executive just made sense to me. Also, the point I was trying to make regarding Mary Robeson was that I wish they had focused on a story from her family /background beforehand. You could play the Vin artist from many angles.
    • Nielsen Ratings for this same week 39 years ago May 5-11 1986. North & South Book II mini-series pre-empted a number of ABC shows. What the heck was NBC’s Fast Copy about?    

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy