Members Chris B Posted December 28, 2006 Members Share Posted December 28, 2006 Yes, but all his recent pics have dark hair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DruRocks Posted December 28, 2006 Author Members Share Posted December 28, 2006 I actually enjoyed the revelation to Katherine. That was well done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members dragonflies Posted December 28, 2006 Members Share Posted December 28, 2006 IMO this was totally predictable. I saw this coming when Kay started having her "nightmares" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DavidsMuse Posted December 28, 2006 Members Share Posted December 28, 2006 Lots of scenes with CLB and VI would be wonderful indeed! Jill WAS a teenager when she gave birth to Phillip III, so if JW played a bit older than she is and VI played a bit younger than he is (which he's done with all of of his daytime characters!), it COULD work! I DO know that Kay, Jill and David as fiercely-loyal, fiercely-loving, battling family would make them and CE a force to be reckoned with again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BadZoe Posted December 28, 2006 Members Share Posted December 28, 2006 LAD and Jack Wagner are the perfect example of why not to cast a mother and son with only a minor age difference. I was watching the B&B the other day and couldn't get past what a raisin JW has turned into and am really waiting for the big reveal that Jackie is his older sister instead of his mother. VI does not look a day younger than 40 and Jess actually looks her age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DavidsMuse Posted December 29, 2006 Members Share Posted December 29, 2006 Jill gave birth to Phillip III as a teenager, so if JW plays her real age (57) and VI plays David as 40 years old (who historically has played characters at least 5 years younger than himself), then 57-40=17 years difference within the story, which is plausible. But I'd MUCH prefer them as brother and sister! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Southern Honey Posted December 29, 2006 Members Share Posted December 29, 2006 It sure was. I'm starting to catch on to patent LML hairbrained schemes, and this is textbook for her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Chris B Posted December 29, 2006 Members Share Posted December 29, 2006 I don't recall anyone guessing this (or anything close) so I'm not sure how predictable it was. The closest we got was speculating that David Chow was Katherine's son. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members sheilaforever Posted December 29, 2006 Members Share Posted December 29, 2006 You consider a mere five seconds of suspense well done? Okay, take it. They've got Jess Walton and Jeanne Cooper and come up with such lousy writing, without any real interaction, but just checking of plot points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Chris B Posted December 29, 2006 Members Share Posted December 29, 2006 I agree sheilaforever, the reveal was dreadful! The episode also had Neil admitting to his affair, but everything was so rushed and poorly written that it didn't work. But the blame for that lies mainly on the scriptwriter. I forget her name, Lisa something, but Y&R is one of her first major credits and she started writing in 2003. They should've given it to one of the more experienced ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DruRocks Posted December 29, 2006 Author Members Share Posted December 29, 2006 What are you talking about? I'm talking about when Charlotte Ramsey told Katherine that the baby she gave away was Jill. That was well done, and the actress who played Charlotte Ramsey will be missed. Jeanne Cooper was divine in those scenes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Juliajms Posted December 29, 2006 Members Share Posted December 29, 2006 I think people are talking about when Kay told Jill about the DNA results, not the reveal way back when. I actually thought the DNA reveal was ok for what it was. Not every moment has to be about suspence and drama. I saw that scene as a mother teasing her daughter a little when they both got the results they were hoping for. I'm not sure how else they could have done it, unless they had decided not to have them be mother/daughter. I'm hoping they both get more meaty material in the New Year and it sure seems like they will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DruRocks Posted December 29, 2006 Author Members Share Posted December 29, 2006 ^Oh THAT. In my other post I was talking about the 2003 reveal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DruRocks Posted December 30, 2006 Author Members Share Posted December 30, 2006 Because of the whole Phillip/Jill/Katherine stuff here is a clip of Philip Foster (Thom Bierdz) being cross-examined by Michael Crawford during his adoption hearing. Clip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members fee93 Posted December 30, 2006 Members Share Posted December 30, 2006 It will be so ridiculous if they gloss over the fact that Nina's son Phillip really isn't the Chancellor heir anymore. I really, really hope this brings Nina back the show, even just temporarily. She should be furious at Katherine on behalf of her son, but also compassionate to Jill who pretty much lost her son twice! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.