Jump to content

DAYS: April 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

But someone still needs to submit themselves for the award.  I have no idea if she did or didn't but the process wouldn't be meaningless if she literally didn't try. 

For example people like Deidre just don't even bother anymore.  

I know Vanessa Marcil didn't even try in 2010-2011 because she was meh on the material.  I don't know Ari Zucker and I do think she would submit, but if she was just over the process the emmy's can't just give her an award without her doing her due diligence.

To be clear, I absolutely think she deserves a nomination, but we don't know all the facts here yet.

Edited by carolineg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 341
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I think the forum where we can only communicate through writing rather than speaking often leads to semantic disagreements.  However, to clarify, I'm suggesting that for any actor not to submit because of reasons unrelated to their talent, makes the award illegitimate. 

Because how can one say that Xyz actor gave the best performance, if some people were unwilling to engage in the process for reasons other than their own perceived quality of their acting?  The same would be true for any award from the Daytime Emmy to the Oscar.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am just speaking off minimal awareness and I agree writing this out can be more difficult than us actually speaking.

My point is Days probably wouldn't have promoted AZ.  She's in the middle of a lawsuit.  I assume she didn't want the extra hassle of trying for an emmy, and let's saying winning, in the middle of said lawsuit.  Because that might muddle some things as far as her case.  I am not advocating that this is right, but if she WINS a lead actress emmy there could be some ammunition against her case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am totally confused. 

However, I personally wish that actors would submit. But, how can I not respect that they might have other ideas? And I can't imagine any way that winning an Emmy would hurt her lawsuit. As far as I can tell everything she alleges has already been proven to have happened. What is a defense against facts already established? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ari has been nominated a few times.  I don't think they snubbed her.  But coming from a family of lawyers (with no legal expertise on my own) I could see just not even trying and the goal is more of the lawsuit win.  Which she should win, but winning lead actress emmy's when she is trying to make other more valid points might confuse this whole thing especially if she's going to trial.  I could honestly just be spitballing conspiracies into the air, but I could see why Ari might not want to win awards for this show at this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Given that I don't value awards in general, I certainly agree that I hope she wins her lawsuit, more than I hoped she would win an Emmy.  In fact, I really wish that she doesn't sign any settlement that wouldn't let her publicize her triumph in the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm confused -- are you saying that if any actor fails to submit, that makes the award for that category illegitimate?

I'm sure there are actors in every category of every award who fail to submit. We don't have to know why to feel the award is legitimate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Back to today's episode, The Spectator is tracking Clyde, but completely ignoring that the mayor is radioactive and stuck in a snow storm?

So, proud of Marlena for keeping some degree of confidentiality and not blabbing to John or Stephanie that Everett stopped treatment.  But, I don't like that look Everett gave after signing the divorce papers (I guess they don't need a notary). 

Then, we find out that Chanel and Johnny are fine, even though we saw Paulina hug Chanel?

And my hopes of lil' Thomas trying to control John with the card were burst.

Finally, are the Dimeras the last men in America dressing in suits and ties every day; even when they just hang around the living room?  I bought three blazers during lockdown that have yet to ever make it out of my closet. 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All the radiation stuff… Skip

Johnny singing to Chanel was really nice and sweet though. But I’m still wondering why a Dimera sings so much like a Southern country boy

Please register in order to view this content

Today made me realize just how much stuff Harris is involved in. I almost forgot that he’s the one who’s responsible for Lucas being stuck in the monastery. His scene with Kate was really good.

So were his scenes with Stefan. I hope they continue on with this storyline. It could go in a lot of directions, especially if Harris somehow ends up being the catalyst for everyone’s secrets to come out. 

I also liked Kayla putting Ava on blast. It seemed more sophisticated than what we’re used to, more than just a campy bitchfight. Kayla’s anger came through pretty well. I don’t think anything will come of it but I enjoyed it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I get confused about who knows what since they share so much information off-screen.

For example, today I was surprised that Harris doesn't know that Ava helped Clyde escape.  Why would she admit everything to him, but that?  And why is she giving up the Bistro?  Did she only manage it?  I thought she owned part of it?

And is that it for the radiation story? There are no consequences.  It was just a one week thing.

Between the radiation and the tarot card, last week was a complete Obi-Wan wipe. - There are no droids, cards, or radiation here…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy