Jump to content

General Hospital October 2021 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Tbh I have no desire to see any of the teens (yes I know they're 18) do love scenes or be naked. I'm fine with any sex they may be having just being implied. I adore Nick Chavez and think he's a cutie pie but I feel the same way about him too even though he's 22. They just look so young to me, like there's just not a lot to see there when they take their clothes off. They can kiss all they want but that's all I need to see, personally. Save the nudity and love scenes for someone like Josh Swickard

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 331
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

The only surprising thing about Spencer and Esme sleeping together is they are SO not touchy feely with each other, pretty much ever. Even when they’re alone. But I can see Esme using sex as one of the ways to keep Spencer close to her. I doubt she has any real interest in him, sexually or otherwise. 

I was expecting all the college age teen actors to be on less, but somehow Eden, who will also be playing competitive volleyball, is still on contract? I guess there will be more Esme vs Joss. I was really hoping we would get a grand romance with Spencer and Trina. 

Edited by Nixor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Spencer doesn't even look at Esme like he's attracted to her. There is zero affection there. They're beyond asexual, which is why I have to wonder if the complete lack of chemistry is intentional. Their scenes are just totally awkward to watch. 

Edited by AlexElizabeth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh it has to be.
I am not a NC groupie but he can act and he can turn on the charm when he wants. So he wouldn't play it THAT way so consistently if it wasn't intentional. But I said before, it kinda had been going on too long without explaining us WHY they are together if Spencer is so not into it.
This is all very confusing but I need at least a hint.

If they know where they are going with this of course. Which, based on recent track record, they might not.

Edited by FrenchBug82
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've seen people who question if Spencer and Esme are really even a couple because there is just so little chemistry and affection there. I too have to believe it's intentional because look at how he turns on the charm with Trina. NC is more than capable of generating chemistry. He has more spark with Trina in the 2 second preview for Monday than he's had in every scene with Esme combined. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agree completely about the decidedly intentional lack of chemistry between Spencer and Esme. I could buy them as partners in crime who like to cause trouble, but I really need the backstory. Was Spencer just bored and lonely in boarding school and that’s why he took up with her? If he’s staying with her now because he feels like he has to (either because he owes her or he’s afraid of her) I want to know that too. Spencer was coming on to Trina so hard at first and while it’s clear he still digs her, the script itself makes it seem like he’s loyal to Esme. I’m gonna need some explainin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Esme/Spencer really don't have chemistry. But I definitely think there has been a shift in the way they have been portrayed as couple recently. I do think that the show has made them more touch feely lately as a couple and trying to sell them as more of a "real couple" for whatever reasons. Spencer went from not really being interested in Esme and being shocked/uncomfortable when she first kissed him to being more affectionate/boyfriendly towards her.

When he found out that Sonny was alive, he was being affectionate with her, by grabbing her hands and celebrating a bit with her. He's also been shown snuggling up with her recently on the couch/cuddling with her. He's been shown defending her both publicly and privately lately and now they have revealed they are sleeping together, which seems a bit deliberate on the show's part. I am definitely interested in seeing why there seems to be shift with them.

I wonder if it's because they may really like the actress AP that plays Esme. Maybe they want her to stick around longer term and this might be why they are indicating there might be genuine feelings between her and Spencer. Plus Sydney is now recurring. Granted she could still be shown a nice amount like WL/Cameron has been shown. But I did hear someone say that Sydney indicated she might leave when her contract was originally supposed to be up, I believe next spring.

If that is the case maybe that's another reason why they seem to have shifted with Esme/Spencer. Plus, they are dragging out Esme's backstory, and being deliberately being vague about it. Maybe's that another indication they want to keep her around longer. Drew who is on once or twice every two weeks situation has been explained better than Esme's had. We still don't know much of anything about Esme's background, motivation, etc..

Esme/Spencer still don't really have chemistry but I do think that the show has been trying to paint them more like a genuine couple lately and I wonder why that is.

Edited by xtr
for clairfication
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My mistake, I should have said when her contract was originally supposed to be up. It is true that she was just taken off of contract, but I have seen people indicate elsewhere that she might  leave sooner than later. There are people that still think she might leave some time next year. There are people on Daytime Dish that said she did an interview a bit back that indicated this. (Though that may have been before Sprina really took off) They have people over there who seem to have insider information. They have been correct regarding information that they have posted months in advance about spoilers and some show departures.

Hopefully Sydney sticks around for a while, And people like Nick Chavez are still promoting Sprina which is a nice sign. But you never know. Regardless though I think that there has definitely been a bit of shift with the portrayal of Spencer/Esme's relationship lately. 

Edited by xtr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It would be a shame if we never got to see Sprina with these actors. But the way this show has been lately, I could see them just never completing that thread. Still if Sydney leaves I hope they recast Trina with Sprina in mind. I do not need to see this become sort of Joss/Spencer/Esme triangle 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hopefully, we end up getting Sprina with this set of actors. Nick and Sydney are still promoting them and they do have that Zoom event coming up. Those are good signs for the couple and it does seem like the show is starting to have more movement with them again. Even with factoring in the shift with Spencer/Esme.

I do think that the show has been a bit disappointing with the way they've handled Sprina the past seven weeks,(Ever since the Turret scenes/Esme's official introduction.) They haven't given them much alone time after Esme showed up interrupting them on the Turret. They've had like one alone scene since then (right after the stalker reveal).That's pretty much been it, until the scene we will get on Monday's show. I would have liked to have seen them get more time to interact/bond in spite of Esme introduction.  I think that would have been better and given even more weight to them and the stalker reveal. 

And I think they should have also done a better job of developing Esme/explaining Spencer's motivations for being with her. She's been on too much to not have any more development than she's had. We really don't anything about her outside of the fact that she's Spencer's girlfriend and she's adopted. They should have done a better job of explaining her motives/who she's really/after what she really wants. I don't like how they are dragging out/being vague about her backstory.

Edited by xtr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 Sydney & William asked to go recurring because of taking college classes but both want to remain on GH.

James Patrick Stuart who plays Valentin has never been on contract with GH in his 5 plus years on the show & he gets major story a lot.

Being recurring doesnt mean we wont see Trina and Cam. It just gives the actors control to work GH around their classes & Im sure GH knows what they have with this younger set & know it would be dumb to lose them. So I bet they will work with them.

 

Edited by John
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If they don't have a contract they can't keep them, whether they say they are "working with them" or not. It may work right now but if Lipton or SM get another offer from primetime, streaming, etc. they will be gone. Whenever that happens soaps always say they will "work with" hot young stars who get other jobs. It always ends the same way, this is a very old story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It surprises/disappoints me too that GL's ratings during '89-'93 don't reflect the quality of the show. But when I call it great soap, I'm not defining that by ratings either.  I'm probably in the minority, but I think Reilly takes something intangible with him when he goes. There's a sense of humor that just disappears in '93. 
    • Ok, I know nothing about Another World except their catchy intro song from long ago, but this makes me want to catch!  That crazy mother keeping her son's girlfriend or wife hostage, wow! 
    • And maybe Hotel could have been placed at 9pm Tues instead of Paper Dolls. Not that I thing it was a surefire thing but at least viewers were familiar with the show and it might have done better than PD. ABC's line up was pretty threadbare at that point. And with a big guest star to launch the season - Elizabeth Taylor- the numbers would have been there initially.
    • Any fan of RuPaul would dispute calling any of these examples “drag”. A costume?, A disguise?, A lame attempt at humor? -- yes -- Drag? -- nope
    • No asterisk. I meant that the circumstances during the first year were in her favor.
    • Maybe I am misunderstanding you? Are you suggesting that her success at GL should have an asterisk next to it because she was smart enough to exploit a weakness in the marketplace to gain ratings?  Note: Try not to take this personally—I’m not accusing anyone of being consciously misogynistic. I’m simply proposing that the origins of certain ideas about Ms. Phelps—such as claims that she was unprepared or a poor manager of her writing staff—may be rooted in misogyny. Perhaps, with the benefit of hindsight, it's worth reconsidering those opinions. At the very least, imagine being one of the few women in the room while a male network executive tries to decide what women want to watch during the day. That context has certainly led me to reassess many of my own long-held views.
    • Through 78 and 79 under Marland and Pat Falken smith GH was still heavily hospital based with a mix of storylines. The Doctors would have been fine had they followed that template. Once GH went with Ice Princess all bets were off.Who knows how much TD would have copied that direction? And OLTL, DOOL went in that direction quite heavily while other shows dabbled in far out stories. The thing is that TD was well set up for an expansion.
    • Thank you

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Aaron Spelling still had clout with ABC in Fall 1984, as I think they knew he was going to pull out all the stops for Dynasty to get to #1, which he did. That's probably why ABC kept Hotel as Dynasty lead out. Fall 1985 with the sale to Capital Cities and Brandon Stoddard arrival, Aaron Spelling would lose his clout with ABC.
    • Correction, July 1991 to May 1995. JFP got the ratings up during her first year, but it also helped that ABC big three were tanking at various times during that year and Days was in their post-supercouple/pre-Reilly mess era. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during the Calhoun/Long/Curlee era did not reflect the quality of the show.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy