Jump to content

Retconning: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

You're right, that makes no sense, lol.

 

If they wanted to make Tad Damon's biological father in order to anchor Damon to the show, that's one thing.  Doug Marland was guilty of that [!@#$%^&*] all the time on ATWT.  But why make Damon Hillary's child as well?  Damon's mother could've been another woman -- maybe someone Tad met during those years when he was presumed dead/thought he was Ted Orsini -- and it wouldn't have affected the story at all.

 

Am I wrong, or didn't AMC, in its' final days, also reveal that Adam Chandler had an illegitimate, Hispanic son named (I think) Miguel?  To me, it seemed odd 1) that Adam would have found the time to father this kid, considering how heavily involved he always was in storylines and 2) that he would have known he HAD another kid out there but never bothered to claim him.  (Remember the hell he put Brooke and Dixie through just to get his hands on J.R.?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 318
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

You aren't wrong... there was mention of an Hispanic son named Miguel Reyes.  I think there were rumors that Asher was going to be Miguel.. but it turned out he was a Cortlandt instead of a Chandler.

 

And then the writer change happened and the Miguel plot never was followed up on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kreizman & Swajeski squashed both. Lorraine Broderick and Michael E. Knight both lobbied for Carmen Thomas to be brought back as Hillary (gorgeous Carmen Thomas, by the way), and were rebuffed to wait until K&S took the writing team helm. Yes, Asher was originally intended to be Miguel... and then he was, I guess, reassigned to be Michael Nouri's son, and a new love interest for Colby, because K&S wanted to ditch the Damon character completely. 

 

I thought Damon as Tad's son was great, and I think of him as being conceived during the Dixie hiatus years of the late-90's, when she'd moved back to Pigeon Hallow - and Tad basically had nothing to do, save for a brief fling with Gloria, and then a non-fling with Camille "Lurker Girl" Hawkins. Hey, with excitement like that in PV, why not look up your ex in LA to see if those embers are still crackling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

God yes! I think most fans would understand that some very expensive music might be deleted in order to bring a series to DVD, but there are some songs that are so iconic and important to a series' identity, that deleting them simply ruins the DVD experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The retcon on a serialized drama that infuriated me the most (and negated the entire six-year run of the show), was the revelation during its series finale that none of the characters we had watched on St. Elsewhere, none of the events we had witnessed them go through, were actually real. They were borne from the distorted imagination of an autistic child. I think most fans loathed that pointless and stupid twist.

 

On Days: The man we had known for years as Dr. Neil Curtis is not really Dr. Neil Curtis, but an imposter who had taken over his life. Never mind that Neil's FATHER had previously been on the show, and never noticed anything odd about his "son". And after the truth was revealed, the revelation about Neil being a fake Neil was dropped, and went without any legal or person repercussions for the imposter.

 

On Peyton Place: The Next Generation (1985), Constance MacKenzie Carson tells her granddaughter Megan (the daughter of Allison MacKenzie and Rodney Harrington) about Allison's "last day" in Peyton Place, before Allison mysteriously disappeared and ended up in a coma for years.

 

Supposedly, Allison was pregnant by Rodney the night she went missing. Supposedly it was on the eve of Allison's and Rodney's wedding. Supposedly, hearing that she was illegitimate and the product of her unmarried mother's affair with Elliot Carson (instead of a non-existent "husband" Connie had invented as a cover story) drove Allison out of town.

 

Um...no. In the original primetime series from 1964-9, we never found out why Allison had vanished. She was last seen in an evening in 1966, wandering aimlessly around town, and then heading down a dim pathway, never to be seen or heard from again. No one ever discovered what had happened to her.

 

Allison had been told the truth about her parentage about a year and a half before she vanished. She had accepted Elliot as her dad and they had become close. The Elliot drama certainly did not make her run away. Allison and Rodney had never finalized wedding plans, either, and had never been on the brink of marriage. And while Allison and Rodney MAY have had sex, I find it hard to believe that she could have disappeared one night, ended up in a coma, and yet still given birth to a healthy baby girl. How good was medical technology in 1966/7?

 

In the daytime soap from 1972-4, Return to Peyton Place, the story went that Allison had been held captive by a drug-addicted (but hot and sexy-as-f*ck)  Benny Tate. She eventually got away from him, made her way back home, and resumed her relationship with Rodney Harrington. The show ended with a shot of the lovers on the dock, looking forward to a future together.

 

In the first made-for-TV reunion film from 1977, Murder in Peyton Place, Rodney had found Allison but no explanation about her disappearance was given. They were on their way back to Peyton Place when they were both killed in a car crash.

 

Then in the second reunion movie from 1985, The Generation, Allison was alive again (although Rod was still dead) but in a coma, and viewers were presented with the retcons/continuity errors mentioned above.

 

In both the primetime and daytime versions, Norman Harrington was married to Rita Jacks. But in Murder in PP, he was married to Jill Smith, with only a brief and vague reference about him having had "a first wife." Rita was nowhere to be seen.

 

Then in The Next Generation, it was Jill Smith's turn to be erased. Norman was suddenly married to Rita again (as he always should have been). 

 

The various incarnations of PP have all been a challenge to sit through, for nit-picky viewers with long memories..

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually thought it was a clever way to end a show that had always been a little quirky and eccentric. 

 

Did you guys also feel the same way after 8 seasons of Newhart that it had all been a dream of the character from the original Bob Newhart show?

 

And I always viewed the Peyton Place soap, tv movies, etc... as sort of like a Choose your own Adventure.. where you got to see how different choices affected the show, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Now that you put it that way, I don't think I've ever heard or seen any criticism anywhere about the Newhart finale. But I also think there's a huge difference between a comedy full of eccentric characters and a drama tackling contemporary issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it was a creative way to end the show and it's still being talked about 30 plus years later (much like Newhart). 

 

It made sense this came from a mind of a child suffering from autism and people feeling ripped off that the characters weren't real kind of makes me laugh because they weren't real and I viewed the move as a wink to that.  But that's what makes the world a wonderful place... one event conjures up different reactions in different people and when that happens, then it's a success

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • HAHAHA. Yeah, that's my bad. I misread that line. Sorry about going into "Unnecessary" detail about my username. Anyway, I love the story behind your Username.    reading on my phone...

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Completely agree with you. I think Bonita Brisker has been really good as Sharon. What Anita did was obviously awful, so she doesn't need to reign anything in. We're getting a good look at someone who's struggled in life compared to Anita "We're the Duprees!" Williams.   -- Anita is starting to look foolish for dredging all this up just so she  can get her ass back on stage. Is she so delusional she doesn't realize how she hurt Sharon and Tracy? -- Anita's line to Vernon "How can I expect Sharon to forgive me when I haven't forgiven myself" struck me as really selfish. After all that with Sharon, Anita again made it all about herself. -- Does anyone really believe Anita wants equal billing if the Articulettes reunite?  -- Colby Muhammad continues to be a standout. Her Kat more than holds her own with Leslie. -- The writing was very good for the father/daughter scene between Ted and Eva. It wasn't so good between Ted and Martin in their father/son scene. It didn't play like family to me, especially when Ted referred to "my wife" when talking about Nicole to Martin. -- Overall, a very solid show today.    
    • I honestly do not see the point of Max coming back again. Zoe does not surprise me. I've been waiting for that since Bionic Woman flopped in the US, frankly. I'm not against it vs. some other pointless returns. Some returns work and some don't, some are just there. Like, am I grateful that Kathy is alive? Yes, absolutely. Do I love any of her stories? No. But she's not utterly destroyed, she's just there.
    • I think Frank probably wanted to try for Jonathan with Kate Mansi. I actually can't knock the idea of a Lucky/Kristina affair or flirtation on paper, as a romantic obstacle to LNL2, but not with the characters in the places they are at present or have been over the last few years. It would be a mistake to do right now and would poison the well. I think Jonathan probably made it clear when he came back that he wanted what had been promised to him years ago with Elizabeth, and between his not being one of FV's preferred focal leads and Liz being a grudging afterthought if she's not with one of his OLTL stars, I suspect FV was content to leave them where they are vs. where they should be, which is central on the show. It's like I said a few days ago: A lot of this is how Lulu has always been. But back in the day the issue was that Lulu (and Carly) were deified for it, whereas now it's that Lulu is just used as the heavy because FV has a preexisting favoritism for Setton/BLQ. And that's a waste of a key character and talent, namely Alexa Havins.
    • Melanie Smith was very difficult to replace, but as KMH did last for a long time, she clearly managed to do so. I preferred Melanie, but the main issue with Kelley is I just think she was horribly written for most of the time. Initially the writing wasn't horrible, it's more she was not the right choice, but over time the writing genuinely became awful, and unplayable, with a few exceptions (I think her pairings with Chris and Hal worked and got to take her in some new directions).
    • Coming into June and...   TRASH. Or as I like to say for moments like this...HUNNI, WHAT IS THIS?   Outside of seeing Traci come home...and then...Ashley...not a darn thing is going on. So they are clearing stalling now, aren't they? It really hit me during the Phyllis/Daniel scenes. It was feeling like a B&B scene where two characters have the same repetitive conversation. And I have not seen Phyllis/Daniel scenes in that light lately so yeeeeah NOPE.   I did like the touch of Traci arrived outside of the Abbott mansion door and taking a breath and looking around. Very aftereffects of Martin. And I liked her and Diane having their conversation about Martin. I wished JG had allowed Traci to stay in town to deal with her feelings about Martin so at least we are getting some follow-up on that.    And same with Ashley and her talk with Jack. I will take Eileen Davidson anyway I can get her. Dare I say...will she be around for the Dumas reveal?   Outside of...   Kyle, Claire, and Harrison in a park IS NOT a storyline.   Sharon having to use the phrases (and in text) with Nick dinner as friends IS NOT a storyline.   Giggly Heffa giggly-heffa-ing around town IS NOT a storyline.    With Damian MIA and my love of Eileen Davidson...I might just go on break until the Dumas reveal if this is how we are starting June. 
    • Dragging this quote over from the Texas thread just because it shows a reference to Bay City as a fictional location at least as early as 1981. It doesn't quote Gail Kobe as saying it directly but the point she is making about the Houston setting of Texas does seem to take it for granted that Bay City is not real.
    • It's too bad they couldn't get access to the old music cues from the 80s and 90s, to run with the flashbacks or in the current scenes. That would have added a lot. Imagine if they had played the old Roman and Marlena theme.
    • Wonder if any of the Beyond the Gates people were asked. Admittedly, the show hasn't been on long enough for any of those actors to get much interest.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy