Jump to content

External Scenes in American Soaps


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

I think it matters a hell of a lot. Days literally looks like total crap every time I tune in, but once you get past that the stories are actually pretty good. It's a shame as I really like Days but I would like it to look soooo much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Re OLTL

Was the ceremony shown eg the voes etc or was it another case of visuals only as seemed to be more common in the 70s.

 

1n 72 ATWT went on location for Toma and Carol's wedding.Irna Phillips seemed fine with this as she commented favorably on this in an interview at that time as a new way of telling a story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

But, if you notice the aesthetics BEFORE you notice the stories, then could you REALLY say that the stories are good?  I would think that the storytelling and acting would grab your attention first, and THEN the sets, costumes, lighting, music and other stuff.

 

I always go back to Bill Bell's words: all you need for a good scene are a man, a woman and a waterfall -- and who in the hell needs the waterfall?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I see what you're saying. I do think the stories are more important than the aesthetics but I do think the aesthetics are important as a separate thing. The stories are what keep people watching, if it looks good that will draw people in. I HATE the way Days looks, but I really like the show. You can't take it seriously though as the exterior scenes look like a fairground.

 

It's a bit like finding a boyfriend. You're drawn in by what they look like but the real connection comes when you get to know them and form an attachment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The sets can be so bad they pull away from the performances though.  Even with amazing talent.  Sometimes cheap looks like it.

 

I can handle the downgrade from the lux early 1990's, when most of the soaps sets looked as good as primetime.  But sometimes the sets are so harsh no performance can shine through.  That restaurant/club on GH that is very dark and the walls are dark blue often makes the actors look blue with the shitty lighting.  One time it looked like Anna's white jacket was blue, her teeth looked blue, her skin looked like she was ill.  That distracts from an amazing actress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B has been doing outdoor shots regularly for probably ten years now. They have regular outdoor sets and everuthing looks seamless. Not only do they have that but they also go on out of town location shoots regularly. I loved when they used to send Steffy to Aspen was it? They should be the model for everyone especially Y&R. I can't understand how they're on the same network but Y&R's location shoots look so cheap and raggedy. B&B is lucky to have Ed Scott. I can't begin to express how foolish it was to let him leave Y&R

 

ATWT used to do regular location shoots in its final years and they looked good. Guiding Light of course did the experiment where they transformed completely to the British model of having standing outdoor sets and going on location every episode but it was ahead of its time. It also didn't help that the stories were SO bad that it just didn't work. Had the stories been better it would've been easy to put up with the learning curve but eventually I do think the show looked fine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree on DAYS' sets and how it detracts from the overall experience of the show. @Edward Skylover DAYS' production values began to tank around early 2009 when their budget was slashed (which coincided with the ouster of Deidre Hall & Drake Hogestyn, plus the dismissals of Mary Beth Evans & Stephen Nichols... plus rumors of Kristian Alfonso & Peter Reckell taking drastic pay cuts). Before there was Horton Town Square, a lot of scenes in 2009-2010 took place on the Salem pier. 

 

I equate Horton Town Square with Guiding Light's Main Street, used from 2005-2008. HTS at least looks clean and makes sense, aesthetically speaking. GL's Main Street was a hodge-podge of ugly. 

 

With the decrease of set usage and an increase of redressing sets and calling them different locations, it blurs the sense of watching a real town; a real community. It also blurs my memory of when certain scenes took place and certain places with certain people. It all becomes a big blur of BLUE ROOM. That g0ddamn blue room, redressed to be a hospital waiting room, various hospital offices, Horton Center's office, Club TBD's back office, a judge's office to decide custody cases, a freakin' motel room, a supply closet... everything, you name it. Next year, it'll be a revamped Brady Pub. 

 

Another part of what decreases the overall soap experience is that everything is way too coincidental now. We thought soaps were full of coincidences before, but nowadays when there's only 2 or 3 public meeting spots, it's SO conveniently easy to run into someone, to spy on someone, to overhear someone, to find someone who's hiding, etc. etc.  Can't find a convict on the run? Just check Horton Town Square or that park bench with the giant bush walls. 

 

And something that really detracted (that they've improved upon in the past couple years) for me is when they stopped bothering to include ambient outdoor noise. Whenever a character was "outside," it was/is dead silent. No chirping birds, no low howls of the wind, no crickets at night, no natural ambiance. Dead silence just augments the fact that they're standing inside a cold studio. 

 

Okay, end of production values rant... for now.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There are playlists on youtube with years of episodes. But they are not public because for the last two years, Sony has been taking down every DAYS related clips and channels on youtube.

My friends and family who don't watch soaps usually mock them for how cheap they look. Sure they make fun of the acting (mostly because of actors like Ronn Moss and Drake Hogestyn) but it's always the production values they comment on first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Well, no new episode tomorrow, but you should do a catch up. It's worth it!
    • *Gavrilo Princip has entered the chat* I haven't watched BTG in approximately two months because of the busy season at work, but now it's summer, and I'll have time to get back into it. Do y'all think that I should do the 21st century binge-watching thing and attempt to catch up on everything I missed or should I do the traditional soap thing and just start watching again tomorrow and figure everything out from there?
    • A few days late but this made me holler so bad and immediately took.me back 29 years when I first saw this. I still remember thinking Rick and Phillip were going hold each other and dance together LOL. Rick being there at least makes some sense as he was A-M’s second cousin and the show still at least recognized he was half Bauer, at least until Hearst left.  The whole Universal Studios wedding was over the top. I think someone wanted A-M and Lucy to be the next GL super couple but once Hearst left the A-M recast flopped and both were gone by early ‘97 with Lucy never appearing ever again.    Love the rest of your post, summer 1996 was the first time GL left me feeing…greatly underwhelmed until it inspired righteous indignation on my behalf once we get to the Gilly twist.
    • You're right. I think she was seen as too subtle or reserved.  As @soapfan770I liked Sheila on LA Law but she wasn't needed here, especially as Charley as a character only made sense with a more reserved and less conventionally attractive actress.
    • That's certainly one way to put it!  What blather. Kind of tells you they knew it was going to fail. I guess they were just throwing anything at the schedule and hoping they would be pleasantly surprised. Thanks for the article.
    • I would guess it's down to Kate Oates. Bowden is very much her type of leading man. She repeated all the stories she did on Emmerdale with his Ben.  I also think EE has become conservative enough that only a white, straight-acting gay man is going to get story.
    • Desert Sun, 13 April 1985 ABC’s 'Dark Mansions’ Loretta Young quits movie LOS ANGELES (AP) - Loretta Young, citing “creative differences,” has withdrawn from her role as the family matriarch in “Dark Mansions,” an ABC movie and projected series, a spokesman for the actress said. The Academy Award-winning actress had been due to come out of retirement to begin work on the two-hour movie on April 22. The movie goes into production on Monday. “Loretta Young will not be rendering services because of creative differences over the story,” her agent, Norman Brokaw of the William Morris Agency said in a statement. “The parting between Miss Young and Aaron Spelling was amiable despite the story differences,” the statement said. Miss Young had been scheduled to play the role of Margaret Drake, the matriarch of a Seattle shipping family in “Dark Mansions,” a contemporary Gothic drama. There was no immediate word from either Aaron Spelling Productions or ABC who would replace Miss Young in the role. “It’s true that we had creative differences over the way her character was developing,” Spelling said in a statement released by a spokesman, David Horowitz. “She's a great star and a great friend and I hope she always remains both.” Miss Young won an Academy Award as best actress in 1948 for “The Farmer’s Daughter.” She was the star of 94 motion pictures and was the creator, producer and star of “The Loretta Young Show” during television’s so-called Golden Age Miss Young had been scheduled to work eight days out of the four week shooting schedule. The movie, a pilot for an ABC prime-time soap opera, also stars Michael York, who would make his series debut, Linda Purl, Paul Shenar, Melissa Sue Anderson, Raymond St. Jacques and Dan O’Herlihy. Miss Young s last film was “It Happens Every Thursday” in 1953. She then took the unprecedented step of retiring from films to produce and star in "The Loretta Young Show" on television. She won three Emmy awards as best dramatic actress in 1954, 1956 and 1958. She was also nominated five other times. The anthology show ran on NBC from 1953 to 1961. In the 1962-63 season she starred on NBC in a dramatic show called “The New Loretta Young Show.” As we know Joan Fontaine took on the role 
    • If Claybon is married to a woman I'm the Archduke Ferdinand.
    • I do think Ben should come back. I think Max Bowden is all wrong for Ben.
    • Thank you, been waiting so long for this, and I appreciate how much work it is typing this all out and creating the charts for us!

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy