Jump to content

Y&R: March 2017 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 587
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Wow is the word!  What a sh!tty storyline. Jill shouldn't have returned for this mess. Why did they put Jess Walton in the opening credits if she was leaving? Colin and Jill as a couple is an utter complete joke. Awful Awful Awful story!!

We usually disagree but I agree with you 100%. Wasting the viewers time on this horrid story!  I guess Jill forgot about Fenmores after throwing a big hissy fit over it?? Sally needs her walking papers like yesterday!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Looking back I do agree that the story was handled poorly now that we know she was going to be leaving. I would've still had the letter from Katherine and closure from her relationship with Phillip, but instead of having Colin spend all her money, they should've given HIM the serious medical crisis if the intention was to write them off together. They could've had a suspicion of him stealing her money, but in the end he was trying to protect the secret of his health, then you could spin off another story once you reveal who DID steal her money. That would've also set up a nice story for when she returns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yep.

 

 

So?

 

No.

 

I think Sally Sussman could have retconned the retcon (of the retcon), undo Jill being Lauren's half-sister, and have Jill leave GC indefinitely in order to trace her origins.  Then, if/when she returns, Jill COULD reveal she's Bill Foster's daughter after all, but by his chick on the side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seriously, SoapSuds, no one needs Brenda's unhinged ass back on this show, looking off to the side (for the TelePrompter) while reciting her lines over and above everyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 Why do you think that? She didn't say that, or insinuate it in any way. If anything, Tristan Roger's tweet says the exact opposite. I don't think he would have tweeted that they were both off the show if it was something Jess Walton wanted.

 

The only time Jess "said" she wanted time for her family/grandchildren was when MAB didn't want to renew her contract. Jess is a team player and didn't want to make waves so she left peacefully with that comment. But as soon as she returned with JFP she stated in an interview that she left because Y&R wasn't interested in Jill anymore. But besides that ONE comment, YEARS AGO, under the MAB regime, which everyone seemed to think would never end, she has never in any way stated she wants off, or wants to work less. If anything she's always been excited about any story she gets.

 

 It felt like the story was cut short. Maybe Jill was going to take Colin back in the end, but not that quickly. In one day Jill has a bucket list, forgives Colin, and leaves town???????

Please register in order to view this content

  Horrible ending, and rather abrupt, especially for Sally who like to go on and on with dialog. I have to think we didn't see the planned end to the story. Somebody cut it short for some reason.

 

I have to think someone has an issue with the way the writer's want to end Jill's stories. The music box story, the Rachel Bernson story, and Kay's necklace story were all stopped in their tracks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Gloria: "Come on Jack. You have o admit I've become an asset inside and outside of the office. Whatever you need I do". 

Please register in order to view this content

Dear God in heaven why must this show rub our noses this couples sex life?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

To learn this is JW's exit makes the story completely perplexing. I like this idea or basically anything that made Colin a reformed good guy - someone who stood by Jill's side - not cheat her and then 'win' his way back. There was so much wrong here from both a storytelling and a character perspective. Sally really is terrible. So now Ester is going to be all alone in the mansion? What was the point of that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

YAY! Good to know, that would have been one horrible exit story. 

 

Still don't understand the ending. For the most part I enjoyed the story. It accomplished what Katherine's funeral & will ignored, some closure between Jill & Katherine's life long relationship.

 

It was a great idea to go back to the very beginning, right to the heart of their feud....Phillip Chancellor. He married Jill on his deathbed to provide for her and his unborn son, but as soon as he died Katherine stripped everything away, so I got some satisfaction out of Jill's happiness with Phillip's ring. Of course it would have been better if Kay gave her Chancellor Industries too, but since she already had that what could they do? I also would have played the full flashback of Katherine driving Phillip off that cliff. It was never an accident, that's just what Kay deluded herself into believing. Phillip begged to get out and she purposely stepped on the accelerator and drove him off that cliff.  It really would have helped "newer" viewers, who never knew the nasty Katherine of the early days, understand the basis of their feud. But I suppose they couldn't do that after spending all those years turning her into the Grand Dame.

 

But why does Jill take Colin back so fast?  She was still beaming from gazing at Phillip's ring on her finger. She wasn't needy. And where is all this traveling money coming from? Didn't Colin just take it all? At the very least his investment should've come through so he could pay her back, with all those profits he promised, before they reunited and left town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think that kind of thinking gives the writers a free pass. OK let's have Fred murder someone but not face any real consequences because Mary loves him. Maybe she'll be angry for a few weeks and Bill will swear to avenge the death but that will blow  over then we can just go on. The idea that a bit of self loathing and rejection is punishment enough is ridiculous. Especially when these type of characters never reform. It allows the writers to go for shock value over and over.instead of crafting storylines that really delve into a dark/ villianous character. Not many people IRL can get away with multiple crimes and still be apart of a community.
    • I guess Wayne felt it was now or never. He'd made a splash at Days and probably hoped that would lead to a primetime series. If he signed for another 3 years at Days then the momentum would be lost and he's probably have to stay in soaps like so many others. And in the back of his mind there was the knowledge he could probably get a role on SB or GH if he didn't luck out in primetime or Days didn't want him back. As it turned out he returned to Dynasty and got a couple of primetime gigs before agreeing to go back to Days.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      I got to agree. The show was a mess.  The stories that are not working were the ones featured in today's episode. That was a red flag indicating how bad the episode was going to be.
    • Thanks as always @alwaysAMC The remote was panned in the soap press at the time, especially Philip wandering around in the costume as well as some of the comedy.  I have to admit it didn't bother me, even though I knew how ludicrous the idea was of the Spauldings having a wedding at a theme park. I thought there were some fun moments and I did like the scene where Lucy got to cry and grieve over what Brent had done to her.  I think I was just glad to get away from the stories in Springfield, which were bad and getting worse.  There are a number of attempts at revamping the opening music in 1996. I'll be interested in what you think of them. I remember being glad they updated the photos but also noticing how cheap they looked. The show did need a new opening. Sadly, Rauch would instead just not even have an opening for over 5 years.
    • BTG: - Shelley Curtis first listed as Director on May 19   Another FOJulie director. 
    • It’s been awhile since I’ve seen a good soap cat fight so this was highly satisfying. Loved the Drew/Curtis scenes. Drew may not end up murdered but someone is going to try and kill him and it feels like it’s going to be much sooner than later. Who thought Dante ranting and raving for weeks on end would be good writing just to create angst between him and Gio. I really don’t think you needed to make Dante this fuc.king annoying.
    • I get what you're saying, in that this is what allows you to accept what you are watching, and that works for you. But for me, changing the traits of a character that much with a recast and new writing, then they are no longer the same character.  I am unable to accept that a villain is now just a nice dude because the show wants me to, I just cannot.  If they want a grey character, then they should write off the villain and *create* a new character who is grey.  I'll never accept that Sonny Corinthos is a nice guy, despite what GH wants me to think.  Same goes for the villains on DAYS. It's frustrating for me, and not enjoyable.  It occurs to me that I watch soaps to be entertained, and the current show is just making me angry and irritated. It's not fun for me.  I want to honor Drake to see John's story conclude, but there isn't much of interest to me anymore at all, so I'll probably stop following the show in a few weeks.
    • The wikipedia article doesn't explain much. I watched the Party of Five reboot, it was on Freeform in 2020.  It was five years ago, but I'll tell you what I remember: In the original Party of Five series , the parents died, and the five sibling orphans worked together to raise themselves with the older ones looking out for the younger, while managing the family restaurant.  The oldest child wants to have fun but ends up assuming the responsibility. In the 2020 reboot: The family were Mexican, the parents were undocumented, and the oldest child is an adult who could stay in the US for DACA.  In the reboot, instead of the parents dying -- in the first episode the parents were arrested by ICE and sent back to Mexico.   The five children were left in the U.S. to raise themselves with the older ones looking out for the younger, while managing the family restaurant.  The oldest child wants to have fun but ends up assuming the responsibility.  The teens go through teen stuff and the older ones explore careers.  The child daughter feels sad without her parents, and there is also a baby.  But the children were able to have periodic phonecalls with their parents in Mexico, which were very emotional.  The children hire an attorney to try to get their parents returned to the U.S.  The dad phones them to check on the management of the restaurant.  The younger children crave talking to the mom on the phone. The viewers also see how the parents are coping with the strain in Mexico:  the mom works as a nanny and the dad gets odd jobs-- they almost divorce, and the mom wants to stay in Mexico.  I think a few of the children got to take the bus to Mexico to visit their parents. The youngest child was a baby and the next-youngest missed the parents very much.  In the season one finale, it was decided that the youngest two would remain Mexico and live with their parents.  The older children remained in the USA and were following their dreams.  Season One finished airing just as the COVID epidemic began and everything shut down. The show was not renewed for Season Two.   That's all I remember.  It was good but very different from the original. Edit to add: Amazing how the world has changed in five years.  The reboot was filmed in 2019 during the first Tr*mp presidency, and aired in 2020.  The immigration situation was tense then, and that was explored in the series.  But it seems carefree in comparison to the real world today in 2025. Edit to add more thoughts.  I have no idea what would have happened in future seasons, since the five siblings were no longer a "party of five" at the end of Season One.   Supposedly the cancellation wasn't even announced until after the Season One finale aired.  But the season one finale was 90 minutes and wrapped up some lose ends, so maybe the producers anticipated a cancellation, and did that just in case? Perhaps if it there had been future seasons, the younger children would age and then return to the USA and the five would reunite? I don't know.
    • Probably not. Then again, if any character defined the final 25 years of GL it was Reva.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      The roles of Martin and Kat will now be played by Andre and Eva
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy