Jump to content

Fuller House


dragonflies

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 498
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Oh, I didn't mean to refer to those particular shows you listed. Like you said, there is some very good stuff out there, but there are also things that fail to hit the mark they're aiming for.

 

Technically, the actors playing Nick and Alex are only seven months younger than me, but I can't even bring myself to refer to the one as "Nicky" anymore bc it makes me feel like a creep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This show could EASILY be on ABC, I wonder if Netflix and Warner Bros. would ever strike a deal with them. I mean, between The View name drop, the DWTS cast members and now JS on DWTS it's like corporate synergy.

Edited by Darn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldn't be so sure about that. The pitch he made back then is bound to have been different than the one he made for a show 8 years later. Also, Netflix spent a sh!tton of money promoting the show, which a network may or may not have done. Additionally, what constitutes success in terms of numbers on Netflix might have been a complete flop in terms of networks numbers (we don't know, unfortunately, what kind of numbers Netflix brings in). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here it is:

 

http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/fuller-house-netflix-jeff-franklin-interview-1201715028/

 

“I started back in 2007 with this idea and I’ve been trying to get it set up, off and on — it took six or seven years for me to get this going,” Franklin admits, telling Variety that he sat in numerous unsuccessful pitch meetings for a “Full House” reboot.

“I knew that this kind of excitement was going to be there, but nobody else seemed to get it,” he continues. “I was pitching to networks that ‘Full House’ reruns were beating every night — we were airing 40 times a week and getting millions and millions of viewers. For some reason, a whole bunch of networks didn’t understand the hunger that was out there for this show. It was baffling me. Netflix finally stepped up, and that’s why it’s happening now. It could have happened seven years or eight years ago, but it didn’t.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was. For one thing, television hadn't come along nearly as far then - there would be no space for something as saccharine as FH to exist and thrive as a counterpoint to all the other great programming, both drama and comedy-wise. The big reason something like FH now seems so viable and even charming to me is because everything else on TV is no longer just like it. Miller-Boyett Productions no longer rules the world, quality (or attempts at quality) do. When we have stuff like Black-ish and Fresh off the Boat holding it down for situation comedy I feel a bit more permissive about something that is both quaint and somewhat retrograde as FH.

 

Another big reason: Jodie Sweetin, who's run away with the show like I always knew she could, was not clean at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Netflix was the perfect fit, I just don't see this show being a hit on network TV in the current network TV climate.

 

But I guess we'll never know, the original Full House had its best ratings on Tuesday nights when it was the lead-in for Roseanne. The two shows, though family sitcoms, couldn't be more different and couldn't appeal more to different audiences (in the grand scheme) . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Looking at ratings from TV By the Numbers...Full House does over a million viewers per airing on Nick at Nite. Pretty impressive for repeats.

 

I agree that Netflix is the perfect fit. I love that there's no commercials and we get longer episodes too. Plus they can do stuff on Netflix that they couldn't do on network tv.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy