Jump to content

Backstage Mysteries: Forever Unsolved


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I read some of those Ellen Holly interviews. She is very angry at the show and has lashed out at Erika Slezak over the years.

Ellen say's the first couple of years on the show were great and had good looking guys romancing her on the show. Then in the early 70's it started to go downhill for her and the character of Carla.

I would love to see complete color episodes of her storylines from 1968/69 if they survive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yea, I think that Fulton never really got over the fact that post 79 she wasn't the "star," of the show anymore...actually ATWT worked best as an ensemble so no one should have been the star. I think that Fulton could deliver with a strong director who cared and didn't let her get away with her little mannersims..(the fluttery thing, the stopping lines midsentance, ) and she held her own in a lot of scenes with Hubbard/Lucinda..particularly when she first returned pre Marland and then the continuation of the Whit McColl fued thing when Lisa was on the trail of why Lucinda let Whit take the fall (i.e. Lily's adoption...) and then of course, the John Dixon thing. But that was when people cared and if left to her own devices Fulton kept jumping on Lisa stil being a romantic heroine then a strong older woman with all the money she would ever need.

If you need proof of this watch Fulton's work during the Dobson's time after Lisa marries Whit...Fulton admitted she did everything to get attention, from dying her hair red to making Lisa a screwy ditz..she is almost unbearable to watch in those scenes.

I think the show handled Bob and Kim well up to the end. I wish the focus was on them more, but they stayed relevant to the entire community and they remained vital and involved characters..(much better then how the show handled Chris and Nancy Dobson time..) The big thing was to get rid of the house set and try to move Hughes funtions to Margo and Tom who could never fill that role. I do think Fulton was handled terribly at the end...I wish that the show had kept Brygman, had John and Lucinda marry and we would have a roster of the vets who, not neccessarily have big storylines but are involved and have Bob and Kim the core couple everyone goes to for help, John and Lucinda the anti-Bob and Kim, cackling and casuing mischef in the lives of everyone and Lisa, who at this point in life doesnt need a man but continues to adopt the outcasts and people in trouble and gives her own salty been there done that take on things.

I think it the end it was a combination of not knowing what do do with Lisa, Fulton and her line problems and a personal animosity with her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree; Fulton could be very strong, but some of her mannerisms needed to be reigned it. They were not in evidence in the early years of the show, but seemed to develop as time went on. She needed a strong director, but when she had one, along with good writing, she could hit it out of the park, so to speak.

To her credit, even as Lisa become less focused on, she never openly complained to the press until the character was thrown under the bus. It was hard to watch the vets' importance being decimated during Hogan Sheffer's reign, just as it had been painful to see how much the vets were decimated when the Dobsons were writing (although I blame the producer at that time, as much as I blame the Dobsons).

Bob and Kim did regain some importance after Sheffer left, and they did remain important on the show until its end, and I was grateful for that. But sidelining Nancy and Lisa, eliminating John, and never reactivating core characters like Andy and Frannie, made ATWT feel less like home in its final years.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel like a key reason why the Hugheses were sidelined on ATWT was because the writers, the producers and everyone else involved had no idea how to write for characters who were, for the most part, "normal." In their minds, they weren't "exciting" enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And that's why writers should be required to read backstory b/c the Hughes clan was far from normal and were very exciting. Yes, they were the central family and had 3 successful marriages [Nancy/Chris, Kim/Bob, Tom/Margo] under their belt but they were far from normal or boring as most see them.

Discussion like this get me upset all over again because I hate how the veterans of ATWT were marginalized the last decade they were on. I personally would've had a field day with characters like Bob, Kim, Lisa, Lucinda, Nancy, Susan, and Emma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed! Wouldn't it have been fun to write for all of them? The history between the characters and the actors can't be replicated and wont be on TV ever again. Fun to have them bounce off of each other and their kids and yes new people. Nobody could grimace and no one could roll their eyes better then John and Lucinda watching Lisa walk in, and nobody did mischevious joy in tormenting then Lisa on seeing those two..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I keep thinking about the story someone here once mentioned that I think they said was mentioned at the old WOST boards, about a child actor on a 50's soap being sexually abused by a crew member. Every time I think about it it bothers me, because it makes me wonder how many other soaps this may have happened on, especially in that era, when sexual abuse of children was ignored or used to shame the child.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still cant believe Luke did not get a happy ending on ATWT.

First they give him a BF who to me at least the actor (Jake) seemed checked out for three years.

Then they tried with that Mason story but even Forbes March had said that Standards and practices wouldnt let them do [!@#$%^&*]. Not even hands on the shoulders. If it lingered too long then it was cut

Then the Brian story which I thought may go somewhere but he came out divorced Lucinda and left

So we get Reid and I was happy until he gpt killed by a train

Like I said at the time maybe have Chris get his heart from someone else maybe Damian and then Luke would finally see his father do a selfless act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the tide started to turn against Lisa in early 80s when rumored 'no granny' clause was well-publicized. Of course, Fulton denied it, but how many babies did Margo lose? And the audience really loved Tom & Margo. Lisa got that big storyline in the early 90s story with "Scott" and using the time that Lisa was sent to the 1960s prime time flop "Our Private World." And there were times when she was good, but others were emotionally flat. (Just look at the scene where she's about to come face-to-face with Scott for first time. Her preface to what was going to happen, was laughable.)

Overall, she had some good work with Carly in the beginning but that ended up Carly's return. The John Dixon story was great, but I also think that when the writers chose to humilate Lisa at that party, it was kind of the true end of Lisa. I always thought killing off Kim and reunited Bob and Lisa would've been a really interesting story. Kim was far too self-righteous to me and never understood why she was around.

ATWT was blessed with so many vets and, honestly, because of the show's age, they were a lot of them and most past prime (I'd except Bob, Lucinda, John and Susan). Then you had characters who'd been around for 20+ years like Margo, Tom, Craig, Lily, Holden, Emily, Paul, Meg, etc. ATWT for the most part held up well because of the actors, who mostly skilled, trained in theater and weren't hair models. Honestly, I'd have taken any storyline given to Lisa/Kim and given that airtime to the underappreciated Marie Masters, who not only defied her age in looks, but really knew how to nail a scene - no fluttering there at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I only enjoyed two storylines with Kim - the Sabrina reveal and Douglas Cummings, otherwise Kim and her high and mighty attitude could take a seat. ATWT was my first soap - started 1977 - so #TeamSusan or #TeamLisa anyday over Kim! (Now Kathryn Hays seems like a lovely person.) The wrote the character in such a milquetoast way when she actually had a pretty scandalous late-60s/1970s past. I wished they play more of that they way that Marland did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy