Jump to content

Y&R: January 2015 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 559
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well......again being a bit premature but I thought a few things were already discovered a lot quicker like Pratt said....

and there was a Jack and Victor scene (On Monday) that I actually liked for a change, cause it wasn't a typical turnout at the end...

I don't know how to do the spoiler thing on here or else I would add more detail.....haha....most of these things are just my opinion and I don't want to judge based on 2 episodes or like i'm praising Pratt....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only difference, based on Friday's episode, that I personally noticed was that scenes were already shorter and we had 6 or 7 more of them than usual.

Could have been a fluke so we'll see in the coming weeks. I tend to like episodes with less, but longer, scenes and detest those 20-second things, so I hope that's not what we end up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I keep thinking about before Dullan came to town to put us all to sleep, and a reporter asked Eric Braeden if he was looking forward to working with Steve Burton and Braeden asked "Who?"

I wonder if he still has no idea who that is!whistling.jpgwhistling.jpg

"Steve Burton, yes, he's some kind of racing fellow. isn't he...In that NASSSCAR? Oh, you mean that guy who says he's my wife's son? I still don't know who you are talking about. Oh that fellow who likes to do all his scenes with his shirt on! No, don't like him, he gets all my screen time. Who does he think he is! I'm Victor Newman dammit! I'll burn his damn coffee house to the ground!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL

I do have to say, I wonder who the hell will win this, considering Dylan's overpropped ass and Victor's tendency to never lose.

I think Victor will suddenly come to realize that the land he owns sucks and will back off "on his own terms." ;)

Or Pratt will blow it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As much as I would like to see Victor lose for a change, I'm still gonna roll my eyes if he loses to Dildo....

I really do hope that Braeden generally likes Steve Burton as a co-worker.....I know Braeden comes off as an Ogre, but I usually think for the most part he's always very welcoming to having scenes with "newer" actors....whether or not it takes him 30 years to know their names....haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • GH was good? I havent watched since Joss went away to do her traininig and Lulu had just called Brooklyn out for having Dante's baby and not telling him
    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy