Jump to content

Y&R: TMZ reporting on Michael Muhney


Recommended Posts

  • Members

My experience with a sexual harassment situation at work back in the 90s (witness not victim), there is no speaking "in defense" of someone. There is only "What have you seen?" "What have you heard?" "What did you do?"

It makes perfect sense, in my situation the harasser was well-known to everybody as a sex hound who'd put the make on every woman he could but it became accepted 1.) because he was good at his job and 2.) because the workplace was so dysfunctional in so many ways the bar was set rather high. The clash comes when new people are hired and they have a healthier idea of what is and isn't acceptable. The tough thing for the whistleblower is that all the people around her think it's no big deal. It's like growing up in an abusive family. You have no idea what normal is until you meet someone at school whose parents don't put out lit cigarettes on their arm.

HK probably was rightly upset when he first touched her and got the "Oh that's just how he is!" excuse but with the second time she decided enough was enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Also seems possible that HHK was not his first victim. In a situation like he said/she said, they may not be able to do anything the first time it's reported, if there isn't any corroborating evidence. Once multiple people complain or there is a witness, a pattern of behavior starts to emerge and TPTB can take action. All of that coming together could have taken quite awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I went back and found SharonRocks' original post with the scoop (I posted it below). According to her, MM's firing occurred pretty directly after HK reported him. TMZ reported that he had been bullying others besides HK and that sexually harassing her was the last straw. This suggests to me that Sony's HR was aware of his bullying and/or had been investigating the situation prior to HK's complaint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know, not to fan the flames of any ongoing stan wars or anything, but I'd [!@#$%^&*] a brick if we were to learn SharonRocks or their source was, in fact, Sharon Case. I mean, it'd be a little too MELROSE PLACE, but...just sayin'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy