Jump to content

Robin Thicke sueing Marvin Gaye Estate over "Blurred Lines"


alphanguy74

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The guy has swagger! He oozes sex appeal when he talks and gives interviews. He may not be the best looking but looks aren't everything. He makes up for it in other ways and his charisma and presence make him alot more attractive than other guys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think he's ugly... but I don't consider him God's gift to anything. That article was really well written, concise, and makes it easy to understand for those who don't have any real musical knowledge. Even the comparison with TRUE plagarism with the "He's So Fine"/"My Sweet Lord" example, two songs that SOUND very different, but that are too much alike from a structural and legal standpoint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Obviously, it's up to the court to determine plagiarism, but the drum pattern is one that is not oft used these days and sounds similiar. It may just be inspiration, like Emotions by Mariah Carey supposedly had a sample of Best of My Love by the Emotions, which resulted in a lawsuit. A lot of artists are grossly unoriginal these days, so there is lots of suspicion about plagiarism. Drum patterns are hard to prove when it comes to plagiarism, since they are percussive and can be modified in ways that can get around copyright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This...he's average looking (and below average if I compare him with even the small sample of guys I'd screwed with in the past) but he has massive amounts of swagger and he knows how to work it. His voice is just crazy....

in dark and after a couple of shots of patron....well lets just say I wouldn't be resisting of his moves....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Considering that:

  1. Robin Thicke's whole shtick is a quarter-water version of the late and great Mr. Gaye
  2. Pharrell, himself, stated that he was "inspired" by Got To Give It Up

I hope that the family / estate countersue the sh!t out of that culture vulture and the ripoff artist that produced the track and wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't disagree with any of that, but the Gaye family would be foolish and just spend a ton of money on attorney's fees, and they'd lose in the end. Considering Thicke is not sueing for any money, the Gaye family countersueing would just make them look greedy. Just because you make a song that sounds similar to another one, doens't make it legal infringement. All the similarities are in the production, not the actual NOTES of the song. The litmus test from a legal standpoint, is 7 bars. 7 Bars of a song has to be substantially identical to the other to be infringement. And Thicke's song doesn't even have 3 bars that match. You CANNOT copyright a song title, nor a style or production method of a song. I can bet you that the attorneys for Gaye's family would NOT take this on contingency. Look at the genre of Doo-Wop, and how many dozens, if not hundreds of songs in that genre have the same "sound" and the musical elements, even the same background lyrics. But yet none of them have issues with each other in regards to copyright. Gaye's family are just money grubbing and trying to live off their relative's work without getting actual jobs themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy