Jump to content

GH 50: Discussion for the Month of April - May 3, 2013


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Same.

We had to sit through HOW LONG of this Kate/Connie mess and her treatment is off-screen? I'm glad the character is gone for a little bit, but yeah ...

  • Members
Posted
Obnoxious as Tracy is, it is her relish and Duke stole it from her.

It is true AJ got on the stick and got the relish analyzed. Tracy was just sitting around with it. Still, it is hers, so I have little sympathy for AJ here. AJ could just find himself another goal in life - forget ELQ.

  • Members
Posted

Not very unpopular at all. It would have been the "ending" to a long convuluted shitty trashy "storyline". The treatment was supposed to be what all of the rotgut was about, right? So now, we have to just chalk all of that garbage up to nothing just like everything else. A bunch of meaningless scenes that took up way too much airtime. When another alter returns, and it will, I hope he/she is suicidal (and successful at it).

But then again, how do you do treatment when the "writers" have no idea where to begin? The backstory has changed so many times, and Sonny said just yesterday that he has no idea who the host is, a statement that, amongst so many other things, throws the "I got DID because I was raped by JSJ" right out the window. Then Sonny goes on to say that he has no idea who the host will be when she returns? Huh? The hacks were just digging this hole deeper with each scene making Sonny look like a complete idiot.

Thank goodness those ratchet scenes were offset by the wonderfulness that was Bobbie and Carly wub.png

  • Members
Posted

If it wasn't for Bobbie reminding the Slagbeast that she is a ratchet waste of space, I'd have skipped their scenes yesterday.

I'll say it once again - my AJ, Monica, and Evilena shouldn't be the only Qs onscreen. Frank needs to work overtime to bring in more of them - even if it means dragging in the wannabe one to do it.

I see Sonny is full of caca, telling Michael Quartermaine that Brenda left because she 'started having feelings for Jax'. Hombre, please - she left your ass because you insisted on allowing your Slagbeast to run roughshod over your marriage instead of setting boundaries from jump and expected her to be A-OK that you ruined the life of one of her oldest and dearest friends. When I see my girl tomorrow, she better smack him upside the head with the unvarnished truth so that he can really see that his punk-ass actions is what caused him to lose the love of his life.

  • Members
Posted

Even though the Jax thing is ridiculous, it does fall in line with what Sonny thinks. He has thought J&B have been together since they left, so it makes sense. His refusal to see what he did wrong is off base, but in Sonny's mind he probably does think the marriage broke up because Brenda had feelings for Jax. It just Sonny's usual cluelessness and complete lack of awareness. I liked the way he broke down the Lily/Brenda situation. For once he didn't act like Lily was the love of his life and marginalize his feelings for Brenda, although I am failing to see a correlation between a love triangle with two living, breathing women and one woman with two personalities. It was an awkward comparison used so Sonny could do some exposition on Brenda. Seriously, poor Michael. Like he gives a !@#$%^&*] about Sonny's love life over the last two decades.

  • Members
Posted

Brenda barely spent time with Jax during her aborted marriage to Sonny (another glaring wrong done by showkiller Guza), so I don't know what the hell he's talking about. Furthermore, I clearly remember him getting annoyed when she'd hurled the same accusation at him about his Slagbeast (right after he had the nerve to take her along to find Alec instead of, I don't know, bringing his mother with him?), so yeah, he needs to drink a supersized cup of STFU.

Did he ever marginalize his feelings for Brenda when speaking of thirsty-ass Lily? I remember him feeling guilty as hell that his initial choice to leave her for Brenda (a choice that he'd reneged on upon finding out that Lily was pregnant) had spiraled out of control and cost her her life, but I don't remember him ever claiming that he loved her. Ever.

  • Members
Posted

I am not saying Sonny's right. I am just saying he was shooting up Robin's house after J&B took a plane ride together, so his feelings are a little warped on the subject. As far as we have seen, he genuinely thinks J&B are together, so it made sense from a character perspective.

As far as marginalizing Brenda, I feel like Sonny did that most of the 2000's. I vividly remember him referring to her to Olivia as some girl named Brenda he used to date. Lily has been made out to be the patron saint of PC and the love of Sonny's life on many occasions. In fact, this is one of the few times in 15 years where I felt like Sonny was being truthful about Lily/Brenda.

  • Members
Posted

Monday's episode overall sucked. I get that they wanted to pay homage to the past and they are trying to do so without flashbacks. The goals seems to be to recreate those magic moments but alot of yesterday felt false or forced or campy but not in a good way. The Helena scenes were laughable, like the days of freeze the world or aliens. William Ludel as director didn't seem to be able to pull it off. The acting was terrible.

For some reason, Carly scenes really irked me too. I was unconvinced by Carly's monologues...

And don't get me started on Sonny's scenes. Being in love the a split personality. I was rolling in the aisles.

All the confessional scenes were trite and unconvincing..Liz too.

Monica was great.

And seeing Audrey at the end gave me chills. I will tune in today for those scenes.

I have a feeling this week's episodes will produce many cringe-worthy, amateur moments.

And those Richard Simmons scenes last week were painful; someone unplug that queen.

  • Webmaster
Posted

Yesterday's episode was not the anniversary episode. The March 13th preemption due to the Pope pushed things back a day. The actual anniversary episode airs today.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • That's funny, I totally didn't think about the possibility that they'll pin this on someone else. I hope it's not Laura.
    • Andre/Dani, be still my heart 

      Please register in order to view this content

        I knew their booty call hook ups then being friends with benefits were so going to turn into love 
    • Yes it does!! And neglect! They let it drop so long and so often it doesn’t really have much meaning beyond another recurring character killed off. I kind of agree. I don’t want Emma to be SA’d, but he was a creepy professor perv at first, and we could have higher stakes if they let him be a scumbag for longer. Even to add more suspects, like Gio punched his lights out for grabbing Emma innapropriately. Or even better, she punches him, then Gio does too. He had the potential to be fun for a bit longer. I always love it when they do a shooting in the snow on this show lol.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      I went back to see how teen Sami even figured out how to sell a baby in 1993, and the recap is unintentionally hilarious. The exposition is so blunt it feels like the writers drafted it between bites of lunch. Suddenly there’s a teen mom named Karen who sold her baby through a shady lawyer, and somehow Sami just… knows this man and pays him with hospital volunteer money. You can tell they were trying to make the whole thing “plausible” enough, but also knew the baby wouldn’t be gone long enough to justify a real subplot.  I know one thing, if Karen had confided in Jamie, Sami would've never met Steve Miller. Jamie knew that snitches get stitches. Not to be confused with the horrific Stephen Miller, who was 8 in 1993. AND Just to show the audience how shady Steve the lawyer could be, he was played by this guy -- Character actor Terry Wills was cast as creeps on every sitcom in the 1980s.
    • I can’t help but to get drawn in by Dani and Andre but it just angers me that it’s so obvious that they’re not endgame.
    • John and Marlena may have committed adultery, but they weren't going to be smug creeps about it. "Roman, how do you feel about the name Isabella Titania Brady?"
    • -- It's always amazing to me that these "terrible breakdowns" (by writers so bad they shall not be named) are saved by incredible script writers. Every time 

      Please register in order to view this content

      -- Kat is a "spoilt bitch" while Eva isn't??? -- Does Kat go too far with her mouth? Absolutely. But I get it. Eva has done some terrible things and continues to enable her criminal mother while Kat's family and boyfriend DEFEND her and show her love. -- Eva's complaints about Leslie are meaningless, because they're never backed up with anything. I'll take "spoilt bitch" any day before I take "criminal enabling hoe." -- It's nice that Martin accepts Eva, but the way he's handling it is eye-rolling. Eva gets hugs and smiles and full acceptance while Kat is trashed -- to Eva's face. -- Martin is STILL obsessing over the Kat conversation about sex that Samantha heard. Are you kidding me with this? And now Eva offers to speak to Kat. Yeah, very cute that the sister who screwed the other sister's boyfriend is the one with relationship advice. -- The food at Uptown looked pretty good today. Orphey Gene's food has yet to impress me, and I think it's clear that the country club chef is an alcoholic who cannot control his kitchen.
    • At this point, Marlena, John, and Roman all thought Roman was Belle's father. Sami had switched the initial blood tests. When it was time for another round of tests (because Belle was jaundiced), Sami panicked and kidnapped the baby.  Up until January 1994, Sami was the only one who knew that John was Belle's father. Next up were Stefano and Peter, once Stefano read Sami's diary (he figured it would reveal what was going on between John & Marlena). Stefano revealed the truth of Belle's parentage to Roman AFTER Marlena revealed her tryst with John (about two weeks later, to be exact). Marlena and John were the last ones to find out (during February sweeps, naturally). The John Black name was revived in September 1991.
    • The show has been getting better and better. Dani and Andre solidly "coupling" has been amazing. Genie Francis says soaps don't do couples anymore...maybe Dani/Andre can prove her wrong. To me they are the best couple on the show.  Eva vs Kat is always great. The show continues to find ways to keep it going and I'm all for it. Kat annoys me so bad. She is such a spoiled princess and acts it. I agree the comment about wishing Eva had been aborted was low. If that were the case, then why is she constantly getting in Eva's face? Why doesn't Kat just stay away and ignore her completely like she doesn't exist? I know. I know. It wouldn't be soaping.  This Hayley plot to kill Bill now taking a detour onto Izaiah has me curious. Does Hayley even know what she wants? I can't wait to see the fallout for Hayley and Randy....but not too soon.  I am tired of hearing about Winterfest already though. Can we get to it? lol
    • Great rundown of Long's second stint. Now you got me wondering...and again, thinking how real life impacted the direction of the show. We were talking about how practically the minute Long landed back on GL, she wrecked Ross and Vanessa and threw Alan and Reva together. Soon after, Alan started pursuing Vanessa again (because he was SO afraid of the "real" feelings he was having for Reva for the first time in his life, LOL). It's like she was determined to do an Alan/Vanessa/Somebody triangle at some point. She started one with Billy as the third side (well, actually, Alan was the third side) back in late 83/early 84 before Bernau exited GL the first time. So she had to drop it. But since Billy was gone this time, she seemed to decide, hey, I'll do it, only with Reva as the missing side of the triangle. Then Maeve left, messing that up! So I wonder, would she have had Alan and Vanessa marry? Maybe not, but I doubt Vanessa would have taken kindly to being overthrown for Reva. Could have been done in a really humiliating way, like after the invitations went out or even at the wedding. Maybe she would have helped Phillip with his plot to dethrone Alan. Lots of interesting possiblities.  I did like the way this story was handled. Chelsea was clearly more in love with Phillip than he was with her. Even "dead," no one could compete with Beth. So it was always doomed, but they showed how Phillip lost his way because he was obsessed with getting back at his dad. I also thought the relationship between Alan and Chelsea was a little...strange. He was very much in favor of their relationship, even though she came from an even lower background than Beth's. She also always fiercely defended Alan. Which has made me wonder if--ick--one of the many writing teams was thinking about putting them together romantically. (Of course, in my headcanon, where Alan has a youthful romance with the never seen Reardon sister, his fondness for Chelsea then makes perfect sense.) I always wondered why they never thought of putting Chelsea with Rick, especially after they butted heads over the death of her fiance. Seemed like a no-brainer.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy