Jump to content

AMC: The Prospect Park Era (old production thread)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

A poster upthread called this particular case of SORAS "disturbing" and a "joke," which I think is overblown because this isn't the first time SORAS has looked absolutely silly because of the appearances of the involved actors. Examples have been given. Once again, I hate SORASing. I've never seen the point of it, ever, and I wish it didn't exist. I wish Agnes or Bill or Claire on SOMEONE had put their foot down when creating a new soap and said "On this show, the children will age naturally." Alas, that never happened, and here we are. I've learned to just accept that it will happen on all soaps, sometimes in the most ridiculous of ways.

BUT, my main problem here is that because I am not seeing a big deal about this particular case of SORASing, I was labeled as "trying to convince others that everything is perfect in the PP soaps." The PP soaps didn't invent SORAS, so I fail to see why this is being interpreted as a Prospect Park problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, Claire did. For at least the first 10 years, I think, RYAN'S HOPE had a strict policy about not SORASing and instead allowing the children - John Reid, Ryan Fenelli, etc. - to age in real time. Unfortunately, by the time Joe Hardy had become EP, that policy was overlooked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If I came across that way to you, AMS, then I apologize. I wasn't directing that or any similar comments toward you specifically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right, which is something I always forget because they eventually did muck that up and have that obnoxious Johnno recast. Of course, it illustrated my anti-SORAS sentiments. The writers got bored with the characters they had, wanted to write new/younger characters, so they cashed in the 10-year-olds and brought in 20-year-olds.

But of course, that's related to another one of marceline's (and mine) soap pet peeves. Instead of just introducing new characters and slowly tying them in with the existing characters, they were stuck on The Almighty Core.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

FWIW, I don't look at this as being PP's problem. Somebody -- Agnes, Marlene, Ginger, somebody -- should have nixed the idea as soon as it was brought up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like it, I think some are just too hung up on it. It's done nothing's going to change it at this point lol.

LOL tongue.png

I think it's funny that alot of the same people who don't like this SORAS have NO problem with Liza being deSORASed. I think this more believable than believing Adam was married to JL's Liza or that her Liza was in high school with Jesse/Angie and Tad in the early 80's. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What idea? A.J. and Miranda being SORASed?

That was as obvious as the nose on my face, and I got a big [!@#$%^&*] nose. Of course they (and Pete, and Angie's daughter) are the teen leads for the new generation. Anything else would be weak tea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Brooke clinging on Ridge was cringe. Yet Ridge could've reminded Brooke + Katie that he's with Taylor and happy, so he's just as pathetic. Maybe they are destined. Yet another call out to Liam's mom. By November sweeps unknown twin Linus will be in LA.  
    • Saw this posted on IG a few days ago:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • 5-16   At last....AMANDA!!!   And I had mixed feelings tbh.   So we are back to this again? And by this I meant Sharon/Nick/Giggly Heffa. While I liked everyone looked good (you better wear those high heels, SC!!!!), been there, done that. I liked that Sharon and Phyllis came to some truce right before Sharon and Nick went off to London. It would have been nice and creepy to watch them bond and Phyllis take an unhealthy attachment to her new friendship with Sharon due to her PTSD. So I'm sorry to see that fall to the wayside.   Meanwhile, I would like to think that now that Amanda has shown up as Dumas's lawyer that it meant that soon we will get that Dumas reveal. I'm happy to see MM. However, like Lily, Devon, and Nate, I too was not liking the wordplay she was playing.   Meh. at Sally babying Billy. I did like Nick calling him out.   Well they do exist. So I wouldn't be surprised. 
    • Hm. I just realized that Dani/Andre feel like the main B plot this week. And I'm not at all complaining about that. I just figured it would be Doug/Joey/Vanessa storyline, but there is one last week in this month so perhaps that is just going to be a C plot until next week.    
    • Thanks for starting this thread!  I was hoping others were listening and would want to chat about it. I'm really enjoying Montecito!  The production and audio values are top notch. The storylines are interesting and keep me wanting more.  There is corporation succession, cheating, alcoholism, bisexual relationships, divorced parents, brother/sister drama, scorned mother, father/son relationship issues, etc. At first I couldn't stand Mena's (sp?) voice, but I've grown to enjoy her and I love to hate her as a villain. I keep hearing Smitty (BTG) in Mike Manning's voice, so it keeps throwing me haha. The only thing going against it is one episode per week, at only 18 minutes long, so we need more content. Anyone else listening and enjoying it?
    • This, plus they nixed their overnight set crew during the COVID era and never brought them back.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I did some research because I had a similar question. (also, I don't want to poop on your joke which was amusing, but it sent me down a rabbit hole) A Reddit user who works at TeleVision City (where Y&R is filmed) estimated it takes 45 minutes to set up or reconstruct an already built set.  However, according to union rules, it takes at least seven crew members (not counting lighting and sound installation).  As always, the real cost is the labor, not the task.   Y&R uses robotic cameras, so there is only a skeleton crew on set.  Most of their crew budget goes to production assistants, who cannot move sets.  So, they would need to hire a crew every time they wanted to put up or take down a set (for two days) as well as a lighting and sound design installation.  Which is obviously very different from how production worked when money was more freely spent (and good for the unions for keeping the workplace safe). So, filming a single day in Lauren and Michael's living room could cost as much as they spend on two actors salaries for an entire year.
    • I knew Giovanni Mazza was talented but damn that kid is a star in the making. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy