Jump to content

AMC: The Prospect Park Era (old production thread)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

WHY can't they just embrace them as continuing dramas? Why are we stuck on this fake badly acted sex scenes and women slapping each other? Why even move online if this is the crap they're projecting to a potential audience? It's just so stupid. I'm not even angry, I'm just...so confused. THESE SHOWS COULD BE GREAT, WHY WON'T THEY LET THEM BE GREAT????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was an extremely tongue in cheek spot. I'm not sure what's so terrible about that.

There has been plenty of serious-minded promotion. A single cute online spot about their YT channel is not going to hurt that. And what's more, promoting the shows as super-serious adult dramas non-stop would not have done anything but make people roll their eyes when they tune in and find slightly higher-end, somewhat more adult soap operas. It would have been setting themselves up for ridicule and claims of being pretentious.

What they have done is promote the shows on a serious level pretty well IMO with both the major online and TV spots, and then still were able to have a little fun and laugh at themselves with a tiny online bit on their channel. I'm not seeing the problem. I loved it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What are you talking about? No one said that. I just thought the ad was stupid and pandering to the LCD.

And I even found their "serious" promos middling and mediocre. These shows, along with their promotion, simply aren't of a quality that I find appealing or impressive. I'm not just going to bask in the glow of AMC and OLTL being back, that's stupid, I want excellence.

I know, I'm asking for too much.

(Do I just to add "IMO" to any of this?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, Darn, that is nonsense. You were gushing about those promos when they came out and I know because I was there. In bed.

I don't think the ad was pandering. I think it was just a bit of silly fun on their online channel which is not the main outlet for their programming. I thought it was cute and silly and it's obviously not part of the mainstream promotion. I don't see how it is a harbinger of dreadful promotion or bad product. It's just not that serious. (And I still don't know how or when you turned on the shows so fastwhen you seemed to be loving them for at least the first two weeks and we're now in...week 4, but whatever, whatever)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was excited to have the shows back...sorry if that clouded my judgment literally minutes after seeing the first promos.

You're just twisting words tonight, it's fantastic. "Harbinger of dreadful promotion or bad product"? Not what I said (I think this is a sign that the promotion will get worse or that the product will be bad? I already think the product is pretty dreadful...AMC moreso than OLTL).

I was loving the shows? Are you serious? We've been arguing about them for a month! The hell...and I didn't turn on anything, turning implies I was 100% behind what these shows were delivering. You know that I wasn't so you can stop with that. I didn't think the first week of AMC was good, I still don't think it's good but I did say the production had improved ever so slightly recently. And I praised OLTL initially but like I told you, I have no incentive to watch (and yes, Todd/Victor's [who I know has left town] presence is a large part of why). They've yet to make me care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, unless I am completely misunderstanding you seem to be suggesting that the promotion does nothing but appeal to the lowest common denominator and not strive for a better audience or a better soap. And if that is the case I just think that's a total misread of a silly one-off spot on the YouTube channel which is not indicative of the larger campaign.

The way I remember it, we argued about a few storylines here and there but I didn't get the impression that you had totally soured on the shows overall until...a week ago? I just think you're too hasty and you think I'm too blindly idealistic. Which is nothing new. But it's fine. We can settle this the way we settle all things: On Skype, slathered in vaseline, with metal sporks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Going back to the Reilly days, so many Salem residents have killed, tried to kill and/or threatened to kill people with virtually no fallout for them. It's bothered me for decades. With the new writers, it seems there might actually be actual consequences to Xander's violence this time. I hope it's not resolved quickly. Paul and Linsey both did a great job today. 
    • I’d like to see Ashley paired with a fatal gunshot. 
    • I like the twist of Drew framing Tracy, but now I'm sad that it deprived us of the sight of Jane Elliot performing "These Boots are Made for Walkin," which is such a perfect Tracy Quartermaine song. 
    • Andre and Ashley just feel like to me some stereotype in the making. The latest news of white women with black men has not been pretty. I know we have Vanessa and Doug but they represent another side of the spectrum.
    • I'm not sure when exactly they started but I remember Chris Schemering claiming they wrote the Rick/Monica/Jeff stuff as he said this type of melodrama later found them success on Dynasty but did not work on GH. He mentioned dialogue between Rick and Monica like, "You're my heaven and my hell," and, "I have a fever in my blood and you're the cure." (presumably the next line was not about needing "more cowbell.")
    • Would not necessarily call myself a shipper, as I think shipping is quite an unhealthy state of mind to exist in, but would I like to see them paired? Yes, I would.
    • I can't stand Andre with Ashley.  Sean Freeman acts the scenes well but I just don't like how Andre is being written in his scenes with Ashley. (edit to clarify: the dialogue is stilted) The last few episodes have been same Fairmont day, everyone in same wardrobe. Fyi, I can't detect it from watching but Andre's white shirt is leather https://www.shopyourtv.com/tag/andre-richardson/ specifically goatskin leather: https://shop.mango.com/us/en/p/men/jackets-and-vests/overshirts/100-leather-overshirt-with-pockets_67085137
    • I have to agree. Yesterday wasn't too bad either. I'm glad there was some movement in the B and C plots, and I'm very intrigued by Bill's story.  Nice scenes.  I have to rewatch them, though.  @Liberty City A Andre and Ashley shipper?
    •     Oh wait, I got that wrong, I think? Correcting what I said: Chelsea and Bill both assumed that Dani was fake-kissing Pamela.  But meanwhile Pamela asked for the reason for the kiss and Dani explained that she was trying to give Pamela something to focus on other than Diego.  So now I think that Dani just wanted to help Pamela, but Bill and Chelsea misconstrued (as did I).  But then Dani reverted to form and taunted Bill about it. Chelsea would be right if Dani was just kissing Pamela as a ruse to make Bill jealous.  But maybe it was really about Pamela and not about Bill.
    • Lulu is not thinking about Gio here What will this revelation do to him?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy