Jump to content

DAYS: November Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 332
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

But thats the thing, Nicole didnt make a false statement. Prior to her official statement, all she said to the cops was that Jennifer pushed her and considering how fast it all went down and her state of mind, its not hard to see why she would think that. Once time had passed and she had time to process things, she was able to think more clearly and clarified what happened by the time ashe actually did make and signed a formal statement. Its not her fault the police made an assumption. The SPD isnt spposed to just "assume". An actual investigation into what happened would have uncovered that the baby was already dead from the fall. An autopsy is standard for homicide cases and I dont recall Roman ordering one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Such a shame they went choose the direction they did with Nicole... when she could have been just the character to not cut Jennifer any slack. I happened to be on youtube.. and found this very nice video of a certain vixen from yesteryear basically calling Jennifer a selfish shrew...

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cheap, thanks for pointing that out about the police report and her statement. It hadn't dawned on me that Nicole hadn't given her official statement until later. It still doesn't negate the fact that Nicole led people to believe Jennifer had killed her baby. Jennifer wasn't being acccused of pushing Nicole down the stairs; Jennifer was facing manslaughter charges. Nicole knew Jennifer hadn't killed the child. Nicole's statements in front of Brady, Billie, and the paramedics led to Jennifer's arrest. Nicole stated that Jennifer did this to harm her baby when Nicole knew, at that moment, the baby was already dead. Nicole's claims at the Square lead everyone to believe that Jennifer had committed a crime. Nicole set in motion the events that led to Jennifer's arrest and at no point revealed that her child was already dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A) This reminds me of why I don't watch a lot of old Jennifer scenes - they make me feel sad. It's sad to see someone who had a lot of charisma and natural appeal become hard and tired and pointless. Melissa Reeves is the Beth Ehlers of DAYS (in more ways than one, apparently)

B ) If anyone on DAYS today called Jennifer on her [!@#$%^&*], the character would not be so disliked. I have no idea what this character is supposed to be and why viewers are supposed to care about her. She is basically like those annoying neighbors who would show up on the Golden Girls and then die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nicole facing charges? Huh, not the ending I was hoping for. AZ rocked her scenes this week. Everything else is boring: I love ED and Kristen and the ambiguity about whether she changed or not but her scenes with John are so coma-inducing. I like the Gabi/Nick/Will/Sonny storyline, that's all for the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Missy Reeves played this story as Jennifer being unhinged . . . the problem was that during her 'angst-y' scenes with Daniel, she still played Jennifer so cold . . . there's a total absence of warmth in her performances now. But she hasn't been given an opportunity to play much other than the 'shrew' role since DRT & MMcP took over. TL and then PB & PC positioned her as the heroine who all the boys wanted and it didn't go over well (though I loved the writing for J&J during PB & PC's tenure), then the Patrick and Frankie stuff didn't turn out either during Reilly Round II . . . DRT & MMcP were braindead to center a triangle around Jennifer, who had no compassion for Jack, esp. given his rewritten time away from the canvas. It portrayed Jennifer in the worst possible light and after they realized they screwed up so bad, they sidelined J&J and repositioned Daniel on the canvas, first with Billie and then Nicole. I do think Missy did a nice job with the, like, six scenes she did get from March-July '12 . . . because she got to be happy!

I may be in the minority, but I think this baby story got a lot of characters back on track. Before GT & CW, a lot of the characters were aimlessly meandering about the canvas, particularly characters like Nicole/Daniel/Jenn . . . this story instantly put them back on the map with relevance and clear focus. But the whole thing sped along and there wasn't enough of an effort made to draw the viewers into Daniel/Jennifer 2.0 . . . there should've been a lot of longing and the stakes should've been raised . . . Jenn should've gone to trial, etc. The pacing was just way too fast and none of the other characters (besides Nicole) suffered enough through it.

Ari Zucker, like always, completely stole the show . . . but at the end of the day, Nicole was afforded a lot more POV, and consequently, we didn't care about any ramifications for Daniel, Jenn, or their 'romance.' And I don't object to Nicole losing the baby--DRT & MMcP never should've given her a pregnancy story, a defining part of Nicole's character is her tragedy of not being able to be a mother.

But I think the real problem was that Daniel freakin' Jonas joke character fool was at the center of this triangle--I don't think anyone wanted Nicole or Jenn with him, so it was a lot of drama over nothing.

And how horribly were Ari Zucker and Missy Reeves styled for this climax?!? Holy shitballs, "Days" needs to fire their wardrobe and hair people!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Regardless of the content, the form of GT & CW's stories are leaps and bounds better than DRT & MMcP's. I know it's reductive to compare bad and worse, but just thinking about Alamania (and why the f would they send John/Hope/Stefano there when they had nothing to do with the original story?!?) reminds me of how poorly plotted everything they did was. I'm not a total hater, I'm happy to point out their good intentions, but even the ill-paced baby story (and everyting happening now) was, IMO, SOOO much better than the pointless Lumi reunion, the pointless Will/EJ matchup (which could've been so good!), that freakin' safe house stuff, Austin/Abby?!?, Mel/Chad/Gabi, and OMG Kate/Ian/Madison/Brady. I feel very badly for DRT & MMcP because they had such enthusiasm, but suffered from a total lack of experience. But at the end of the day, most of those ideas were just horrible. The bright spot for me during their tenure was Rafe/Carrie--those two finally worked in a pairing, for me anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's one of the worst stories I have ever seen on a soap opera, in over 20 years of watching. It was not only unfocused, depressing, and degrading, and not about the mother, it was entirely pointless, and a huge slap in the face to the character and her fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it was much more degrading to Nicole and her fans to re-pair her with EJ and then give her a baby with him. One of the best things about Nicole is her plight of being childless--it has provided her with so much motivation and empathy. It may sound cruel, but from a character/writing standpoint, I don't think Nicole's supposed to have a baby and she's supposed to be on the outside looking in with Sydney. DRT & MMcP turning her into a supporting heroine with a sympathetic baby story involving Daniel was a big mistake huge. Rafe and Nicole have relevant history together baby/EJ-wise, and him claiming the baby was a nice temporary spoiler for him and Carrie, but moving Daniel over into the plot was ridiculous . . . he's her best friend's ex and they never would've gotten involved together.

GT & CW didn't clean this up well, but at least it finally became a story with movement and consequences. I don't know what I'd do if I inherited a story as disastrous as this. But I do think that, instantly, GT & CW provided the characters involved with clear focus and purpose--the story became a spider web of characters . . . it was actually an ensemble, whereas before Nicole & Daniel were somewhere over here, Rafe was over there with Carrie, EJ would pop up randomly, and other characters would awkwardly comment. GT & CW weaved Nicole, Daniel, Jennifer, EJ, Rafe, Brady, and even Justin and Abby into this cohesively and connectively. The story may've been bad but the form could've been a lot worse. I also am inclined to give Loraine Broderick a lot of credit as breakdown writer.

But I do agree that it was horrible that Nicole went through this another time, and it involved Daniel and Rafe, whereas before it was so much more organic with EJ and Brady. But like I said, I think GT & CW inherited a gnarly task with wrapping up this story and they seemingly agree that it's important to keep Nicole childless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me, if you're going to have Nicole lose another child, and this one a late term baby, the last thing you should do is turn that loss into being about the orange monkey she's only been with for a few months. It took away what the audience was supposed to feel - her pain and grief - and made it about a manwhore, and a horribly unsympathetic woman who treated her mentally ill, longtime husband's death like a split end.

I get the idea of her not needing a baby with EJ, and GT/CW inheriting a mess, but the execution...didn't work for me.

I love your posts though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only saving grace to this horrible story with Nicole were the performances on Friday's episode. AZ did a great job and I totally agree, Nicole shouldn't have a child because it does make her a more sympathetic character and when she does terrible things its due to that yearning she has for a child and that void she has because she doesn't have one. I want her to hit rock bottom and come back badder than ever. Not sure how GV's Eric will play into things but I want Nicole to be the biggest BITCH ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Leslie is an extreme liar and manipulator. I'm not sure what her point was in trying to convince Nicole she wasn't trying to hurt her. As much as Eva did help orchestrate the entire plot I feel like there was too much piling on. Eva never said she wanted to be a Dupree so Anita was extremely out of line for that comment.  
    • Thanks!

      Please register in order to view this content

       That's positive and something to look forward to for sure, because you're right, 1996 so far isn't nearly as good as 1995. Ohh - what is Lonatrat?  Sadly you're probably right. I did feel like David was rarely seen once Marcus came on. That would have been an interesting spin, having Frank and Tina be teenage lovers and Dahlia really being his daughter. I'm getting the sense that Tina won't be seen too much anymore, as she just left Dahlia with Frank/Eleni as she's heading to jail for a while. I like the Tina actress too!  Her voice sounds a bit like Rosie Perez to me, which I love. I tried to find her online, but coming up empty. This was the only thing I could find about Tina Crede - a character snapshot video with clips and stills of her (randomly starting just before the 1:00 mark):

      Please register in order to view this content

      That's wild that the David actor is nearly 40 here! Definitely surprises me.
    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
    • One of the things that I found unnecessary and a bit disturbing about Ambitions was that in almost every episode someone was holding or shooting a gun.  Jamey and Ron seem to have the same fetish.
    • I had thought that there was a Tommy Biddles on there, but then I realized I was thinking of Dr. Biddles on Santa Barbara. Never mind! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I have watched the scene where Vanessa reads the letter and it's lovely, but I'm really glad now that I never got around to watching the funeral. Henry ADORED Nola! He treated her like a daughter and Stacy like a granddaughter. That's why Vanessa couldn't stand her. He was crazy about all the Reardons. He spent a lot of time at the boarding house. He and Bea--they never explicitly said it was romantic, but they certainly were loving friends. This sounds worse than Bert's funeral. I really did not think that was possible.
    • It always bothered me from the start that Nicole just took Mona's suggestion and never checked references.  A real psychiatrist would have done more before hiring someone. ** I like that Kat's reporter/investigative type instincts caused her to be suspicious of Eva from the start, and to try to spy on Eva and catch her as weeks went by. However, I think that Kat's so focused on what Eva did wrong -- that she won't see that Leslie is the master manipulator, making some things appear different than they actually are. I hope that Shanice's natural snoopy nature will get her to figure out what actually happened to Laura, and who really caused all the problems. *** edit to add: The show never specified what Mona's job was for Nicole.  Home manager?  Office manager?  Head personal assistant?  I'm sure there would have been a title?    Mona asserted today her upset with Eva and with Leslie.  That they used her and ruined her reputation.  I just wish I knew what Mona's job was. If Mona was an official manager, then it would have made sense for Nicole to trust the recommendation, if Nicole thought Mona had done a proper hiring procedure.  But if Mona is just an informal helper, then why wouldn't Nicole order a background check?
    • And I'm here for it.   Also...YES, PLEASE. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy