Jump to content

Trayvon Martin Killing


Eric83

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Why should I blame gang members? I blame the person who's racially biased who ASSUMES every black person wearing a hoodie is in a gang.

Should I assume all white guys who are clean cut are serial killers?

  • Replies 291
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Given that reasoning, I guess you believe that if a woman wears tight clothes she's asking to be raped. Or maybe it means that I'm allowed to kill any white guy with a shaved head.

What other articles of clothing allow people to victimize you without consequences? Muslim head scarves? Yarmulkes? Two piece swimsuits? I'd like a list to keep in my wallet. Since apparently men - especially white men - are incapable of not acting like bloodthirsty animals. Let me know who I'm allowed to kill with impunity.

  • Members
Posted

No, it doesn't mean you can rape the woman, but it does mean you can think she's a prostitute. And no, it doensn't mean you can kill the skinhead, but you can watch him if you are suspicious of him. If the skindhead comes up and tries to beat the hell out of you, then YES, you can kill him.

  • Members
Posted

It's a dangerous thing to judge suspicion by what someone is wearing. Zimmerman was the one with molestation and assault in his past, yet his clothes would have not indicated anything about that. Trayvon on the other hand had no criminal record, but his clothes are one of the sticking points for Zimmerman defenders.

  • Members
Posted

Yes, but portraying a 17 year old thug who is on a 10 day suspension from school and assaulting someone as an "innocent child" is pretty biased as well. They both had issues, and dumb and dumber equal tragedy. I know MANY MANY MANY black parents who FORBID, do you hear, TOTALLY FORBID their children to wear that type of clothing because it says something about you. We need to stop dealing with idelastic crap, and deal with reality. If people want to stick their head in the sand, and never become accepted as equal in society because of their stubborness, then so be it. It's their loss.

  • Members
Posted

That's BS, pure and simple. Being suspending from school doesn't mean he was a bad person and like I said, Zimmerman's injuries didn't match the beating he claimed, so I don't believe Trayvon assaulted him, other than trying to get away from him. Trayvon wasn't committing a crime when Zimmerman started following him.

If this situation was reversed and Zimmerman was black and Trayvon was white, I would never be so racist and biased as to blame the victim. It's about fairness, not race and not clothing.

  • Members
Posted

Not for nothing, I lived in a condo community for over 25 years, and the volunteer neighborhood watch and other condo board members were some of the nuttiest, nosiest, most self-entitled/aggrandizing, no-life losers I have ever had the displeasure of knowing. Whether it was peeping through blinds, getting guests' cars towed, calling the police on neighborhood kids who dared to look at their busy-body selves with contempt, standing in front of their townhome scanning the parking lot with a [!@#$%^&*] searchlight... there is a particular type of human out there who delights in the "power" of such menial positions. People who wake up in the morning just hoping to find trouble, or more accurately, make trouble for the rest of us.

  • Members
Posted

Do you all recall a recent case in TX where a man shot and killed a neighbor? They were "feuding", more like the guy kept calling the cops because the neighbors had loud Saturday night parties. One night he called 911 and went to confront them, armed. What raised significant suspicion in the subsequent trial was the guy's repeated justifiable defense textbook speak to the 911 operator, e.g., "I mean, I'm in fear for my life here, I'm in fear for my life..." like he had every intention to shoot someone that night. He'd also had conversations with co-workers talking about how one is in the clear to shoot and kill if you make the other out to be the aggressor. I wish I could remember more details, this was profiled on one of those Dateline-type shows.

  • Members
Posted

People have a right to think what they want. Doesn't give anyone a right to lay hands on her, or arrest her... but there ain't no such thing as thought police. yet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I did not care, just clarifying that was the discussion point. If there are ice cream bars in Statesville I am sure there is a full spa
    • Seeing Peter Bergman (Jack) and Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki) act opposite each other really makes me mad that their short-lived reunion in 2012 was just that... short-lived. I've always loved the Jack/Nikki pairing.
    • No.  I recall there was also a mention about how distracting it was EOB's Gwen wasn't wearing nail polish as well.  That it was someone's pet peeve. And, yes, the fact characters can have a manicure in prison is the wildest continuity issue here.
    • Can anyone remember Mary Ellen Stuart's run as Jenny? I'm trying to fill in the cracks for missing stuff that we overlooked.  Bulletpoints:  * Dated Ross * Rusty's police partner * Directly responsible for Dinah coming forward about George Stewart (Cam's father)
    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton twirling his invisible moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy